All Brooklyn news
Neighborhood Map
Bay Ridge
  • Bensonhurst, Dyker Heights
Brooklyn Heights
  • Downtown, DUMBO
Carroll Gardens
  • Cobble Hill, Red Hook, Boerum Hill
Fort Greene
  • Clinton Hill, Crown Heights
North Brooklyn
  • Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Bushwick
Park Slope
  • Prospect Heights, Windsor Terrace, Greenwood Heights
GO Brooklyn
Dining Guide
Where to GO
Events calendar
Classifieds
The Brooklyn Wire
Not Just Nets
Police Blotter
Perspective
Parenting
Politics
Transit
Podcasts
Brooklyn Cyclones
Special sections
About The Paper
Mobile site
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds

At final Downtown Plan hearing, vote is postponed

The Brooklyn Paper


Harriet Tubman led thousands of slaves to freedom and now the legacy of the famed abolitionist may help save a row of old homes.

Several residents along Duffield Street in Downtown Brooklyn — who claim their homes were part of Tubman’s slave-freeing Underground Railroad — are asking the city to put the brakes on a massive rezoning plan.

Those low-rise buildings, dating back to the mid-1800s could face the wrecking ball if the city approves the sweeping Downtown Brooklyn Plan now up for final approval from the City Council.

But in a surprise move, a council land use sub-committee postponed voting on the plan and asked the Economic Development Corp. (EDC) and Department of City Planning to do more research into whether the homes may have been part of the route to freedom for slaves.

The Zoning and Franchise sub-committee and the full Land Use committee are slated to cast their votes on Monday. The full council is scheduled to vote on the plan on June 28.

At a public hearing on Tuesday, EDC Chief Operating Officer Joshua Sirefman said the city had studied dozens of documents from the Municipal Archives, as well as records from the Department of Buildings, New York Historical Society, census records, historical maps and newspapers and did not find any indication the buildings were part of the Underground Railroad.

"Research to date indicates that none of the early owners or occupants names can be traced to known African-American families or abolitionists who may have offered their homes as a safe house … research also shows the buildings do not maintain their original integrity," Sirefman told the Land Use Subcommittee for Zoning and Franchises.

But Joy Chatel, who lives at 227 Duffield St. where she also runs a hair salon, said nobody had even come to her home to investigate. Hers is one of the buildings that would be condemned for development under the Downtown Brooklyn Plan.

So Queens Councilman Tony Avella, who chairs the sub-committee, asked the city agencies to visit the homes the following day and return to the committee Thursday.

“We need to make sure we’re giving people proper time to do the research and that we’re not rushing judgement,” said Avella.

On Thursday, the committee reconvened and grilled City Planning and EDC officials on the houses. Both agencies contend that there is no evidence linking the homes to the Underground Railroad.

East New York Councilman Charles Barron, a former Black Panther and potential mayoral candidate, said he would not vote for the plan unless the Duffield Street issue was resolved.

Fort Greene and Prospect Heights Councilwoman Letitia James said she is still confident an agreement can be reached.

"We need to balance development with preserving our past," said James, whose been working with the residents.

The only preservation required by the city is to photograph the buildings before they are torn down.

Created to stem the tide of corporations seeking back-office space outside the city and state, the Downtown Brooklyn Plan would allow for the construction of at least 4.5 million square feet of office space, 1 million square feet of retail space, 1,000 units of housing and 1.5 acres of open space.

As part of the $100 million plan, the government would also condemn seven acres of private land including 130 residential units and 100 businesses.

The plan has been approved by Borough President Marty Markowitz and the City Planning Commission.

Critics at Tuesday’s meeting were also calling for transposition and infrastructure improvements. Others said they were concerned about displaced businesses being fairly compensated.


Reader Feedback

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Links