Sections

Markowitz locks out anti-arena folks

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.



Borough President Marty Markowitz invited leaders of a select few groups and elected officials to a closed-door meeting Wednesday to “participate in dialogue” about developer Bruce Ratner’s Atlantic Yards project, leaving critics of the plan out in the cold.

The media was also barred.

A small group of protesters showed up outside Borough Hall for the 4 pm meeting to draw attention to Markowitz’s perceived blacklisting of groups outspoken in their condemnation of the Forest City Ratner proposal to build a basketball arena, housing and office skyscrapers.

“This thing is really a sock in the face,” said Patti Hagan, co-founder of the Prospect Heights Action Coalition. “PHAC, Brooklyn Vision, Develop-Don’t Destroy Brooklyn; all these groups have been working relentlessly for more than a year to bring this problem to people’s attention, especially the lack of process.”

She stood outside with fliers outlining the footprint of the planned development area, and tried to engage anyone headed towards Borough Hall in discussion.

The 24-acre plan, which would engulf a substantial portion of Prospect Heights stretching from the intersection of Flatbush and Atlantic avenues, has spurred the creation of neighborhood associations, employment and housing advocacy groups, and development coalitions over the past year since it was announced.

A Markowitz aide said those were exactly the groups they tried to avoid bringing into the meeting, and instead favored “neutral” and “longstanding civic associations” that were not arena-specific.

Borough Hall spokesman Michael Kadish described the exclusion as a measure to sidestep overly contentious discussion and avoid drifting off topic, which he said was about the “process of offering community input” to the developer and the state, which is expected to lead the application through environmental review.

“We’re coming up with a way that the community can have input to this,” said Kadish, and indicated that the other groups would be part of the process.

Still, the select attendees of the private community meeting could not avoid the topic of exclusion.

When Downtown-Brooklyn Heights Councilman David Yassky left the meeting at 5:30 pm, Hagan approached him and asked what was going on inside.

“Well, right now they’re discussing the need for broader participat­ion,” he said.

Hagan asked Yassky’s own thoughts on the plans?.

“I’d like to see it come in and done right,” he replied. “I’d like to see it done smaller.” Yassky said he wanted to see a secure plan for traffic, but that the meeting wasn’t really discussing that.

“We never really got to substance, but we talked about process and community outreach,” he said.

Duke Saunders, a 40-year resident of Prospect Heights and head of the Vanderbilt Avenue Merchants Association, who ducked out of the meeting momentarily, informed the group outside, “You have infiltrato­rs,” saying their exclusion was the predominant topic of discussion later in the meeting.

Saunders, who is also involved with BUILD, a job advocacy group in negotiations with Forest City Ratner for a community benefits agreement [see story at right], which was also excluded from the meeting, said the general feeling, and his own, was that “more people should be included in this conversati­on.”

To that, Schellie Hagan, the other founder of PHAC, smiled.

“We’re the 800-pound gorilla that’s not in the room,” she said, pausing to set down her poster board sign protesting Prospect Heights’ absence at the meeting.

Sandy Balboza, president of the Atlantic Avenue Betterment Association, huddled on the steps of Borough Hall rubbing her exposed arms on the chilly early autumn evening with a glum expression on her face. She appeared the unwitting protester, and stayed seated while the others handed out flyers.

For Balboza, this was personal.

“I didn’t know what to do,” she said, when she learned that the meeting required an invitation letter, which she and her 7-year-old organization never received. Like many of the invitees, her group just recently joined DDDB’s coalition against the proposal.

The letters, dated Sept. 22, identified invitees as “active residents” and proclaimed Markowitz’s commitment to “finding solutions to community concerns … for your neighborhoods and for all of Brooklyn.”

“I’m on four task forces at Borough Hall. I’ve been to 200 meetings here,” said Balboza. “I’m not some radical nut.”

Lucy Koteen, a member of the Fort Greene Association as well as Develop-Don’t Destroy Brooklyn, signed in to the meeting with her married name, Young, to avoid being recognized and ejected as a member of DDDB.

Outside, in a hushed voice, Koteen told The Brooklyn Papers that the biggest request at the meeting was to have the developer come and talk to the group about the state process of review for the land.

“[The borough president’s office] made assumptions that it would go through the Empire State Development Corporation,” she said. “They did not want us to even talk about the possibility of ULURP,” Koteen said, referencing a much more stringent and publicly accessible city-level review process that was recently urged by three local community boards.

Though Prospect Heights resident Gib Veconi, founder of the Prospect Heights Neighborhood Development Council, which he started this past February, said the meeting was a positive step, he was dismayed at the turnout.

“Even though the project is located almost entirely in Prospect Heights, in a meeting of 30 people, only two were from [the neighborho­od],” he said. “I think that’s an issue. Not to infer it was planned that way, but I think, going forward, in order for processes like this to gain traction, people in the community have to feel like they’re being well represented.”


Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Reader Feedback

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

This week’s featured advertisers

See all ads