Sections

City: Cruise ships at Pier 12 by summer

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.



Brooklynites can expect to see a cruise ship terminal completed as early as next summer, city officials announced Tuesday before a joint City Council committee hearing.

And if the cruise ship terminal, to be built at Pier 12, is successful, Piers 10 and 11 could be cleared of existing maritime businesses by as early as 2007.

The American Stevedoring cargo company currently uses those piers and is awaiting Port Authority of New York and New Jersey approval for a lease extension that would consolidate their operations onto Piers 8-10 for the next three years. But the city’s Economic Development Corporation, the agency charged with implementing the $150 million cruise ship venture, hopes down the line to “morph” Piers 10 and 11, into use exclusively for cruise ships.

The outcome, EDC Vice President Kate Ascher told the council members, will depend on the success of the cruise industry at Red Hook’s Pier 12.

The meeting was dominated by Brooklyn council members, including David Yassky, Diana Reyna, Letitia James, Erik Martin Dilan, Vincent Gentile, Sara Gonzalez, and Yvette Clarke. It was hosted by the Waterfronts and Economic Development committees.

“I think it is plain, Mr. Chair, that Brooklyn’s in the house,” Yassky said dryly to Councilman James Sanders Jr., chairman of the Economic Development committee, as he introduced each member coming in.

Yassky, who chairs the Waterfronts committee, did much of the questioning, probing EDC officials about forecasts for the development, and other members took turns asking just what Red Hook could expect to see of boat traffic, jobs and traffic remediation in the months and years ahead.

Ascher used a slide presentation and indicated that in June the Carnival and Norwegian cruise lines had signed “patronage commitments,” or letters of agreement, to use New York City exclusively for their area ports, to pay raised tariff fees through 2017 that would supply $200 million and would be increased each year following completion of the developments, and commit to broadening their tourist base by helping promote the city to customers, which Carnival CEO Howard Frank said includes “adding extra overnight stays in New York.”

In return, the city will supply $150 million over 10 years for renovations of the berths already in use on the West Side of Manhattan (which are currently underway using another $51 million in city funds), and to develop a terminal and berth for use by ships of all sizes in Brooklyn, that could also help absorb the overflow during Manhattan’s improvements.

Ascher discussed renderings of a master plan at the hearing, which depicted a bright, open terminal built in an already existing warehouse, and showed people in lines similar to those at an airport.

Ascher said the schematic design was being reviewed by EDC’s oversight committee.

As many as 600 new jobs, said Ascher, are anticipated as a result of the Brooklyn development by as early as next summer, at which point the terminal would be “fully operational.” But just when there will be a cruise tenant to supply the jobs was still up in the air.

Testifying after Ascher, Carnival CEO Howard Frank said he did not anticipate opening for business on the Brooklyn berth until spring 2006, nearly a year later than the city’s estimate.

“We’ve committed to our schedules for 2005 already,” he said, when asked by Yassky when the jobs would become available.

Kenneth Adams, president of the Brooklyn Chamber of Commerce, clarified that the lines themselves wouldn’t do most of the hiring, but most jobs would be “shore-side” positions, and include “all those categories of jobs that are local because they serve the ship,” including “taxis, limousines, terminal operations, the provisioning of ships, logistics, communications professional services and much more.”

Adams said the figure of 600 projected jobs was obtained using the Queen Mary II cruise liner, the largest in the world, as a model for the size of ship that would be docking at Pier 12, and suggested EDC may hire subcontractors that could work with area businesses and his agency to ensure local hiring.

And while EDC officials said they would be taking operational control of those piers, that, too, seems to be in dispute.

The Port Authority, which occupies some of the piers from the city in leases that run roughly through 2026 — and owns others has yet to issue a lease or sublease to the EDC. While Ascher said they anticipated a lease would be signed within “the next few weeks,” no date has been set.

Yassky suggested the EDC work on wresting pier control from the Port Authority.

“They’re city owned, am I right?” Yassky asked.

Ascher said it was a “patchwork” of ownership and noted that discussions had begun to consider breaking the authority’s lease on the uplands of Pier 11, parts of Pier 10 and the upland between piers 9 and 10. “It’s exactly what we should be doing,” she said, but added as much as they want to “take the Port Authority off the hook for its lease obligations,” and secure Port Authority-owned land, it would take time.

Additionally, American Stevedoring has been operating without a lease since April, and company officials are also waiting for a commitment from the Port Authority to find out how much longer they will be able to stay.

The problem didn’t evade Yassky’s notice.

“Since both 11 and 10 are now part of the container terminal lease should we see this as a gradual supplanting of the container terminal by the cruise ship terminal, or is there room for both?” he asked Ascher.

“The understanding is that the pier will morph into a cruise terminal starting in 2007,” she replied.

“Whether we build that year or not depends on demand, and the containers will move somewhere else,” Ascher said. “Our intention is to build out three berths for cruise, which is what the 20-year master plan says we need, and intend to accommodate.”

American Stevedoring spokesman Matthew Yates told The Brooklyn Papers that his company, which has a new president, former city Department of Environmental protection Commissioner Christopher Ward, taking the helm on Monday, isn’t too concerned.

“I don’t believe it’s a threat,” that ships would replace the longstanding stevedoring company, Yates said. “We’ll see what happens, but it’s a long way off,” he said, referring to the 20-year plan. He also emphasized there would be room for both businesses on the piers, a point that Yassky had made at the hearing.

“I don’t think we should be saying goodbye to 300 or more well-paying jobs at the container terminal,” Yassky said.

Craig Hammerman, district manager of Community Board 6, also spoke of sharing, and asked that development of Pier 11’s new roadway be designated a truck route to lighten the burden on Van Brunt Street, which is currently used for local traffic, bus routes, truck routes, and will become a thoroughfare for the Red Hook Ikea.

Red Hook Councilwoman Sara Gonzalez, who arrived half an hour late to the hearings, said she would become more involved on behalf of her community, which will be the most seriously affected by the pier changes.

“We understand it will be a wonderful thing that will someday be a great economic boost to the city, but right now we have to make sure the community people are represented,” she said. “I think the dialogue will just continue, as it did with Ikea.”


Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Reader Feedback

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.