Sections

Yassky: Shift a-PARK-ments to DUMBO

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.



Seeking to lessen the impact of proposed high-rise condominium development near Atlantic Avenue at the southern end of Brooklyn Bridge Park, Councilman David Yassky wants planners to consider building more of the revenue-generating luxury housing on inland development sites off the park’s northern edge, in DUMBO.

A 30-story tower, and a wide, eight-story condominium are planned near the Atlantic Avenue gateway to the proposed 1.3-mile development. A 14-story former Watchtower Bible and Tract Society book distribution plant next to that site, at 360 Furman St., is to be converted to 17 stories of condos. An additional 17-story building is proposed for construction on Bridge Park property in DUMBO.

And Fulton Ferry Landing, which is already a tourist destination, would be home to a 150-unit residence and adjacent 220-unit luxury hotel with a water’s-edge restaurant.

Yassky has suggested a modified plan that identifies two sites in DUMBO — which is undergoing a rapid conversion from a warehouse and manufacturing district to million-dollar condominiums and pricey rentals — that he says merely need zoning changes. One is an existing manufacturing building at 10 Jay St., and the other a city-owned parking lot on Washington Street near the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway overpass.

Yassky’s idea is to keep property that Con Edison will turn over to the park planners at John, Plymouth and Adams streets — which is currently sited for the 17-story condo — for parkland, and put the condo buildings among the other inland developments. Then, the planned 30-story tower near Atlantic Avenue could be reduced to 17 stories, he says.

“I met with the [10 Jay St.] owner’s lawyer for the property several months ago,” Yassky told The Brooklyn Papers this week. “I know that they’ve had discussions with the city … I know they’ve expressed interest in participating in the park.

“My position is, regardless of whether this owner says they’re interested or not, they should put that into the plan. I wouldn’t treat this as a negotiation,” he said. “They should just come up with what’s fair for the park to get, and simply put that in the plan. The owner will pay it. There’s no question that those are very desirable properties to build residential.”

Yassky submitted the idea to the Brooklyn Bridge Park Development Corporation (BBPDC), a state authority charged with designing and planning the park, at a Sept. 19 public hearing.

But many DUMBO residents are already seeking restrictions to limit the size and number of new residential high-rises and warehouse conversions in the neighborhood, which features largely 8- to 12-story buildings.

They argue the 20- and 22-story buildings proposed by Yassky inland from the park site are worse than one 17-story tower.

Amanda Barrow, a member of the DUMBO Neighborhood Association, read testimony submitted by her group’s president, Michelle Whetten, before an Oct. 6 City Council hearing on the plan, which was hosted by Yassky, who heads the Waterfront committee.

“We understand that negotiations are currently taking place to shift development from the Con Edison site to a 20-story building at 10 Jay St. as well as an additional 22-story high-rise within DUMBO. While we applaud the preservation of the Con Ed site for open space, as was always Con Edison’s intention in donating the site to the park, we feel strongly that two new 20-story towers would provide far more than our neighborhood’s fair share of the residential revenue to the park,” Barrow read.

Since last fall, the DUMBO Neighborhood Association has urged Department of City Planning officials for a comprehensive rezoning of the area, which local residents say is now approaching the city hearing process.

In a press release, Yassky explained his intent was to more evenly disburse the planned development of more than 1,200 new luxury condominiums while retaining their resulting park fees to help pay for the $15.2 million annual price tag planners say the self-sustaining park would require.

Last December, the BBPDC revised the nearly five-year-old park master plan, shifting the self-financing burden from commercial establishments like restaurants and athletic facilities to fees collected from the incorporation of five residential complexes and one hotel in the footprint of the park.

While all the proposed buildings have faced opposition from residents in their immediate vicinity, the behemoth at the Atlantic Avenue end has incited the most vitriol, largely from residents of Brooklyn Heights, Cobble Hill and Carroll Gardens.

Community members in the southern end of the park, while happy the 30-story tower would be nearly cut in half, were still not happy with Yassky’s proposal.

Judi Francis, a member of the Willowtown Association, in southern Brooklyn Heights, is one in a group of residents putting together a lawsuit against the BBPDC charging the authority improperly reported and evaluated the impact of the park on the surrounding community.

“I feel like we’re rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic,” said Francis of Yassky’s plan.

“They’re giving lip service to what the community has said they wanted, but that’s not what we’re all about, re-arranging chairs,” Francis said. “We want a ship that floats. We want new revenue analysis and we want more than costs on steroids.”



Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Reasonable discourse

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.