Sections

Norman finally locked up, briefly

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

In the end, Clarence Norman’s fall was anti-climactic.

The former head of the Brooklyn Democratic machine and 11-term Assemblyman — sentenced Wednesday to 2-to-6 years in jail for several campaign finance violations — simply got up from his defense table and walked, unhandcuffed, to a holding area to await being sprung hours later for his appeal.

People in my line of work wait years for a day like Wednesday — a day when a corrupt politician trades in his charcoal gray suit for something in a less-flattering blaze orange.
With remorseless machine pols like Norman, you want to hear the jail cell slam tight like in a Hollywood prison movie. You want to see every member of his family breaking down in tears while the judge bangs his gavel to punctuate a lengthy sentence. You want to see a halo-like glow appear over the head of the prosecutor as he waxes poetic about the sanctity of the office that the pol has betrayed.

But on Wednesday, something was missing. Indeed, to cite a catchphrase popular when Norman was first elected in the 1980s, where was the beef?

Earlier this year, a jury found that Norman had solicited a campaign contribution from a lobbyist above the legal limit and then tried to hide it. And this fall, a second jury found that Norman had pocketed a check for $5,000 that had been made out to his campaign fund rather than to him.

Both convictions came as part of a wide-ranging investigation by Brooklyn District Attorney Charles Hynes into whether judgeships were “sold” in exchange for hiring or paying off Norman cronies.

If true, it’s horrendous. But Hynes hasn’t made that case yet, although the investigation continues. The best he could do Wednesday was to trot out prosecutor Michael Vecchione, the chief of his rackets division, who called Norman “a smarmy and dishonest politician.”

Vecchione’s heart may have been in it, but his oratory never reached the level of a good courtroom drama.

“I truly believe it’s a sad day ... one of the saddest days in the history of this county,” Vecchione said, clearly forgetting 9/11, the day the Dodgers moved away or the Battle of Long Island. He called Norman “someone whom everyone in Brooklyn could be proud of ... promising reform and not politics as usual. But we have seen him travel the road from being a favorite son to a smarmy and dishonest politician.”

Vecchione asked Judge Martin Marcus for a long sentence, citing the ongoing investigation with which Norman is not cooperating. But the judge refused to tack on a few years merely on Vecchione’s word that Norman is “at the heart” of an alleged judicial scandal.

For his part, Norman made a half-hearted apology to his family. And he also finally admitted that he had betrayed his constituents — but not because of his conviction, mind you, but because they no longer benefit from his “23 years of seniority, power and influence.” It will take his replacement, Karim Camara, “years to deliver for this district,” Norman said.

And Norman’s lawyer, Ed Rappaport, spoke at length about how his client was convicted of a “non-violent, victimless crime,” as if that absolved him of the need to sit in jail for a few years.

He asked for community service rather than hard time, slamming Vecchione for demanding a five-year sentence.

“I have been involved in cases of murder, sodomy, rapes, but for a first offender whose crime is not violent, it would be unheard of to ask for five years,” he said. “I truly don’t understand what [prosecutors] are trying to do. The punishment has to fit the crime.”

Let the record show that Rappaport did not suggest tar and feathering or running Norman out of town on a rail — the true punishments that fit these crimes.

Even Judge Marcus’s sounded bored when he finally pronounced sentence on Norman. “He well knew the law and was obliged to observe it, but he willfully, knowing violated it,” said Marcus. “The mechanisms by which he did so were devious and manipulative. And his explanation that it was sloppiness, not guile, is unconvincing and shameful.”

Marcus hit Norman with 1-3 years for each conviction and ordered him to pay $420 in court surcharges and crime victims’ compensation fees.

This last request seemed for a moment to be more onerous to Norman than the jail time. When it was handed down, the former Brooklyn kingmaker turned to his long-suffering family in the courtroom and made a face that indicated he didn’t have that kind of money on him.

One member of the family pulled out a checkbook, but Norman had already been removed to the holding pen before she had to write the check.



Gersh Kuntzman is the Editor of The Brooklyn Paper. E-mail Gersh at gkuntzman@cnglocal.com
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Reasonable discourse

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.