The current issue
Neighborhood Map
Bay Ridge
  • Bensonhurst, Dyker Heights
Brooklyn Heights
  • Downtown, DUMBO
Carroll Gardens
  • Cobble Hill, Red Hook, Boerum Hill
Fort Greene
  • Clinton Hill, Crown Heights
North Brooklyn
  • Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Bushwick
Park Slope
  • Prospect Heights, Windsor Terrace, Greenwood Heights
GO Brooklyn
Dining Guide
Where to GO
Events calendar
Classifieds
The Brooklyn Wire
Not Just Nets
Police Blotter
Perspective
Parenting
Politics
Transit
Podcasts
Brooklyn Cyclones
Merchant news
About The Paper
RSS Feeds
CNG Boro Politics

Year in Yards

The Brooklyn Paper

The biggest real-estate project in the history of Brooklyn went from being a dream of a few politicians and a developer to a state-ordained reality this year. And every week, Bruce Ratner’s plan for a mini-city of 16 towers and an arena for the New Jersey Nets was in The Papers. Here’s a refresher course:

January

To the courts: Atlantic Yards opponents move their fight to the courts after two years of demonstrating and politicking. A lawsuit charges Ratner and the state with beginning demolition work on the 22-acre development before officials approved it.

Take my lawyer, please: The Empire State Development Corporation, the state agency overseeing the mega-development, suffers a political black eye when opponents discover that the agency hired a lawyer who once worked for Ratner — and that Ratner had recommended the lawyer for the job!

February

Wrecked: Opponents take a legal hit — and five Prospect Heights buildings come down — when a court ruling allows Ratner to demolish properties before the project is approved.

Beer bashed: Atlantic Yards opponents attempt to boycott Brooklyn Brewery beer after company founder Steve Hindy hosts a party for Atlantic Yards supporters including Borough President Markowitz and four Nets cheerleaders. The boycott fizzles.

March

A numbers “game”: Ratner announces he is shrinking the project by five percent, even though the revision still leaves the project larger than it was when it was introduced. Ever-literary opponent Patti Hagan compares the move to “Alice in Wonderland.”

May

Touche, Tish: City Councilwoman Letitia James (D-Prospect Heights), the highest-profile opponent, loses chief of staff Janella Meeks to Ratner, who hired Meeks to work in governmental relations.

June

Poster girl: Model Sahara Meer (left), whose photo appeared unwittingly in Atlantic Yards promotional material, becomes a poster child for the development’s opposition.

July

Realty check: Ratner invites thousands of New Yorkers to learn about the mostly luxury development’s below-market-rate units. Many in the crowd are confused by the high prices of the project’s “affordable” housing.

Get big, Brooklyn: The state releases a draft review of the project and ESDC Chairman Charles Gargano touts the publicly subsidized mega-development as an important step towards the Manhattanization of Brooklyn. The environmental review reveals significant impacts on traffic, schools and subways.

August

Lovefest special: Ratner holds a Yards pep rally immediately before the state’s first public hearing on the project. The lovefest was so intense that even a reporter — Stephen Witt of the New York Post-owned Courier-Life chain — gave the developer a bear hug. Thirty minutes later, the hearing devolves into a show of racial tension and class difference, with project supporters jeering jargon-laden calls for “contextual development” and opponents shrugging off the other side’s demand for the jobs the project will create.

September

Try again: A coalition of local organizations, the Council of Brooklyn Neighborhoods, calls for the state to scrap its “insufficient and flawed” environmental review of the project and start over.

October

Rejected: New Yorker architecture critic (and Pulitzer Prize-winner) Paul Goldberger slams starchitect Frank Gehry’s design for Ratner’s mini-city.

November

Hands off: A handful of tenants in the Atlantic Yards footprint files a federal lawsuit against Ratner, Mayor Bloomberg and state officials, charging them with abusing the power of eminent domain for private, rather than public, benefit.

December

Boom goes bust: State officials admit that the project will create just $944 million in tax revenues over 30 years — almost $500 million less than boosters promised five months earlier.

All over but the lawsuits: The done deal is finally done. After three divisive years, Albany’s “three men in a room” approve the project.

Reader Feedback

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.