Roger cuts ‘Green’ for Yards review

Citing racism, lawmaker/breaker blocks grant bucks

The Brooklyn Paper

In a final strike against Atlantic Yards opponents, outgoing Assemblyman Roger Green blocked a promised grant of $100,000 for an independent review of the project by a coalition of 40 civic groups, citing a racially charged comment made by a lone individual.

Green, who is black, told The Brooklyn Paper that he instructed state officials to remove the allocation from this year’s $112-billion budget after Daniel Goldstein, a spokesman for the anti-Yards group Develop Don’t Destroy Brooklyn, referred to developer Bruce Ratner as a “white master” in June.

Goldstein is white.

“I was not going to approve any money to any group that included members that had used language that was hurtful to the African-American community,” said Green (D-Prospect Heights), who blocked the grant to the Council of Brooklyn Neighborhoods before his term ended this month.

“Would you give money to a group that included a member who called a developer in a Jewish neighborhood the ‘manager of a concentration camp?’ ” Green said.

Green’s decision to block the grant is not without irony. Despite being a strong Atlantic Yards supporter, he was the lawmaker in control of the grant to the CBN, which opposed Atlantic Yards.

In another irony, the CBN was formed in 2005 after Borough President Markowitz — another a diehard Yards supporter — excluded DDDB from a forum on the controversial state mega-development. Local activists then created a neutral group that could include DDDB as long as it also included associations with longer records of public service such as the Fifth Avenue Committee and the Pratt Area Community Council.

The result was a lengthy review by outside consultants that found numerous shortcomings with the project’s draft environmental impact study and recommended that the state scrap the DEIS and start over.

“We hired experts because outside review was necessary and lacking,” said CBN spokesman James Vogel.

“Now we can’t pay these professionals, who put many hours of hard work into a full and comprehensive review that caught many of [the state’s] mistakes.”

Vogel said that the entire $100,000 allocation was slated to go to the consultants.

The state budget typically includes plenty of handouts to civic groups like CBN, though each must be formally requested by a local representative — in this case, Green, who once resigned from office after being convicted of fudging state expense forms — and approved by the legislature.

Goldstein apologized for his “white masters” remark after it became public, but Green was unmoved.

In fact, he spent much of his last year in office complaining that project opponents exploited racist ideas about the black community.

“These people have consistently used terms like ‘Cadillac Benefits Agreement’ to describe [the Community Benefits] agreement made [by Ratner] with black leaders,” Green told The Brooklyn Paper after Goldstein’s gaffe. “They have used other radicalized language that has hurt the African-American community — and their chances at fighting this project.”

But Therese Urban, a co-chair of the CBN, said Green was blind to the race-baiting done by his side.

“[People who support the project] have used very foul, very racially charged language,” said Urban, who is white. “To bring up one comment and not bring any of the others is very inappropriate.”

City Councilwoman Letitia James (D-Prospect Heights), who helped the CBN get $130,000 in city funding, said Green over-reacted to Goldstein’s gaffe. James, who is black, acknowledged that there had been concerns in both the Council and the state Assembly about CBN’s connection to Goldstein, but said she was ultimately persuaded by the contributions CBN made to the public review process.

“Analyzing the 2,000-page environmental impact study is racially neutral because the project will have adverse impacts on the entire community,” James said.

Reader Feedback

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Links