The Brooklyn Paper: SNA Newspaper of the Year, 2007

The current issue
Neighborhood Map
Bay Ridge
  • Bensonhurst, Dyker Heights
Brooklyn Heights
  • Downtown, DUMBO
Carroll Gardens
  • Cobble Hill, Red Hook, Boerum Hill
Fort Greene
  • Clinton Hill, Crown Heights
North Brooklyn
  • Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Bushwick
Park Slope
  • Prospect Heights, Windsor Terrace, Greenwood Heights
GO Brooklyn
Brooklyn Cyclones
Not Just Nets
Police Blotter
Perspective
Parenting
Politics
Transit
Media archive
The Brooklyn Bride
Brooklyn Boom
Classifieds
Merchant news
About The Paper
RSS Feeds
Esquire Bank

Rent-stabilized tenants fail in anti–Atlantic Yards bid

The Brooklyn Paper

A group of rent-stabilized residents in the Atlantic Yards footprint has lost a battle in the war to save their homes.

In a two-paragraph decision, a state appellate court dismissed the tenants’ appeal of a case that argues that developer Forest City Ratner and the state improperly canceled their leases.

But the 13 tenants, who live in two Ratner-owned, rent-stabilized buildings at 473 Dean St. and 634 Pacific St., are holding out hope that the fight could go on; the ruling said the tenants should re-file their case in a different jurisdiction.

Their lawyer, George Locker, said he might do just that, arguing that “Ratner is doing an end-run around the state rent-stabilization laws.”

Under those laws, according to Locker, a landlord who wants to cancel rent-stabilized leases must go through a process overseen by the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal.

But Ratner did not need to go through the time-consuming process, according to the Empire State Development Corporation, which is overseeing the development of Atlantic Yards, because his plan is to transfer the buildings to the state, which will then condemn the property and turn it back over to Ratner.

Brooklyn Bridge Realty

Locker claims the tactic sped up the removal of his clients from their homes by “at least two years.”

The Locker case is separate from a larger lawsuit that challenges the state’s right to seize property. That case, which was heard in federal appeals court last week, is pending.

Reader Feedback

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Frame It in Brooklyn
Water Street Restaurant
La Bagel Delight
Corcoran