Today’s news:

Now he tells us! On the way out, Doctoroff admits Atlantic Yards process was flawed

The Brooklyn Paper

Departing Deputy Mayor Dan Doctoroff took a parting shot at the Atlantic Yards mega-development this week, offering the stunning admission that if the city had to do it all over again, it would have demanded a proper public review of the $4-billion project.

In an interview with the New York Observer, Doctoroff suggested that he was wrong to sign off on the state’s oversight of Bruce Ratner’s project — an agreement that allowed the state to supercede city zoning and get approval for the project without having to undergo the city’s far-more-rigorous Uniform Land-Use Review Procedure.

“I’m a huge believer in the ULURP process,” he told the Observer. “If it happened again, and the state were to ask if I would encourage them to take Atlantic Yards through the ULURP process, I would say yes.”

The comment sent shockwaves through the opposition to Atlantic Yards — especially since it was Doctoroff who signed the 2005 agreement between the city, state and Forest City Ratner that allowed the 16-skyscraper, basketball arena, housing, office space and hotel complex to skirt local oversight.

That deal ushered in a truncated review of the project that was orchestrated by state officials rather than analyzed by them, critics say.

By comparison, the city’s eight-month ULURP process requires public hearings and votes by the affected community boards, the borough president, the city Planning Commission, various City Council committees and the full Council.

Through ULURP, projects get enhanced review that often results in significant concessions from the developer.

“Of course Mr. Doctoroff is right [that] Atlantic Yards should have gone through the democratic process known as ULURP,” said Daniel Goldstein, a spokesman for Develop Don’t Destroy Brooklyn. “Nearly all of the project’s myriad problems stem from the bypass of ULURP.”

Councilmember Letitia James (D–Fort Greene) said Doctoroff’s “too little, too late” comments at least acknowledged that the city “made a mistake and that the project should have been more transparent and democratic and that the public should have had a bigger role.”

But she seized on Doctoroff’s suggestion of what he would do “if it happened again.”

“What does he mean, ‘If it happened again?’” James asked.

“It’s still happening. This is not a done deal. Dan Doctoroff is still in office and he should pick up the phone, call the governor and get this project reviewed again, this time through ULURP.”

A spokesman for the Empire State Development Corporation, the state agency that sought the override of city zoning that Doctoroff now suggests should not have been done, said the agency would not have a comment on the deputy mayor’s change of heart.

A spokesman for Forest City Ratner also did not care to comment.

Pin It
Print this story Permalink

Reader Feedback

PJ JImenez from Cobble Hill says:
How did he buy that building on Dyer Pl ( NYC/42nd St) for only $235,000 ?
Dec. 16, 2007, 5:12 pm
Natalie Burrows from Cobble Hill, Brooklyn says:
It is interesting that Mr. Doctoroff has been credited with spearheading almost 300 different development projects throughout the city, many of them either unsuccessful or highly controversial. Now he claims he should have "listened" more or have gone through the proper review processes. Either he is a very slow learner or his "mea culpa" comes conveniently too late to make any difference.
Dec. 17, 2007, 10:25 am
warren dykes from bed stuy says:
i totally agree with dan because this is absolutely ridiculous the nets should stay in new jersey and play at the brand new prudential center and have the state do a thorough evaluation on this project remember a lot of building the arena was based on the fact if there were no newark arena, but there is so please gov spitz do not go for the okie dok
Dec. 17, 2007, 11:35 am
Sanford Malter from Upper West Side, Manh says:
As a native Brooklynite with my heart still in Brooklyn I pray that DDD Brooklyn continues their fight to bring Atlantic Yards into the ULURP process.
Dec. 30, 2007, 2:15 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Links