February 24, 2007: Vol. 30, No. 8
Past issues
The Paper in print
RSS feeds
Print edition (PDF)
Email Alerts- The current issue
- Neighborhood Map
- Bay Ridge
- Bensonhurst, Dyker Heights
- Brooklyn Heights
- Downtown, DUMBO
- Carroll Gardens
- Cobble Hill, Red Hook, Boerum Hill
- Fort Greene
- Clinton Hill, Crown Heights
- North Brooklyn
- Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Bushwick
- Park Slope
- Prospect Heights, Windsor Terrace, Greenwood Heights
- GO Brooklyn
- Brooklyn Cyclones
- Not Just Nets
- Police Blotter
- Perspective
- Parenting
- Politics
- Transit
- Podcasts
- The Brooklyn Bride
- Brooklyn Boom
- Classifieds
- Merchant news
- About The Paper
- RSS Feeds
-
Death count rises on Third Avenue; Locals blame DOT
for The Brooklyn Paper
Similar stories
Print this story
digg
del.icio.usThe death of a 4-year-old boy on busy Third Avenue happened because the Department of Transportation failed to follow through on its own recommendations for calming the dangerous strip, activists charged this week.
James Jacaricce was run down on Feb. 13 at the intersection of Third Avenue and Baltic Street — less than half a mile from where two more young boys were run over in 2004, and also not far from another Third Avenue intersection where a 6-year-old boy was run over last year.
Following those deaths, the DOT promised to jumpstart $4-million in planned safety improvements — but those most of those improvements were never made. The planned traffic-calming work would have included raised crosswalks to slow traffic, sidewalk extensions at corners for safer turns, and altered the timing of “walk” signs to allow pedestrians to get a head start.
“These particular traffic-calming measures are designed specifically to protect neighborhood streets from through-traffic and help prevent the type of ‘right-turn conflict’ that killed all [the] boys,” says community activist Aaron Naparstek on the Web site Streetsblog.org.
DOT did not return our calls, but emailed Naparstek and said that the traffic-calming devices were delayed because “underground utilities issues led to the need for more complex designs.”
The agency said 101 “neckdowns” would be installed in the area by 2008 — and Naparstek pointed out that the neighborhood began agitating for them in 1996.
©2007 The Brooklyn Paper
Enter your comment below
By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:
You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.
