Sections

Ratner seeks … more tax dollars!

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Atlantic Yards developer Bruce Ratner is poised to ask city and state officials for more public subsidies to keep afloat his faltering mega-project — but at least two councilmen are just as ready to stop the money grab.

After the president and CEO of Ratner’s parent company, Forest City Enterprises, told industry analysts that “we still need more” subsidies to build Atlantic Yards, Councilmen David Yassky (D–Brooklyn Heights) and Bill DeBlasio (D–Park Slope) said that the already-committed $1 billion in public underwriting is enough.

“My head spins in astonishment that they would want more,” said Yassky.

Ratner has not yet made any public request for more taxpayer dollars, but last month, he told the New York Times that the current economic downturn had made it impossible for him to build the entire 16-skyscraper, 6,800-unit, arena, office space and hotel project.

In the same interview, Ratner said the project has been downsized to just the arena and two or three smaller residential buildings alongside it. The rest of Atlantic Yards — which contained the bulk of the 2,250 units of affordable housing and all of the eight acres of public space — is currently off the table.

But even in that context, the comment by FCE President Chuck Ratner (Bruce’s cousin) in the April 2 conference call with investors and analysts still came as a surprise.

In the exchanger, Chuck Ratner first congratulated himself and Forest City Ratner President Joanne Minieri for getting “various governmental agencies in New York to increase their commitments to Atlantic Yards by $105 million on top of the $200 million they had committed.”

Then he dropped the bombshell: “We still need more.”

The conference call was first reported by the New York Observer, though the Atlantic Yards Report, a Web site, uncovered Ratner’s need for more subsidies.

It is unclear what additional subsides the company would seek. But it is clear that Ratner will have a fight on his hands.

“I cannot approve of more subsidies when the only thing that’s certain is a stadium,” said DeBlasio, who called for “a timeline for the full project, especially with respect to the affordable housing.”

He also demanded to know “exactly why the additional subsidies are needed and what they would be used for.”

A Ratner spokesman declined to comment for this story.

Given the apparent collapse of Atlantic Yards, Yassky called on city and state officials to renegotiate their deal with Ratner.

“Whether you think the original deal was good or bad — and I think it was a bad deal — the project that he agreed to build is not being built,” Yassky said. “So we need to renegotiate.”

Fifty-eight-million dollars of the city and state’s initial $305-million contribution have already been given to Ratner — money that Yassky thinks should be given back.

“They’ve gotten $58 million for a project that they’re not going to build,” he said.

Daniel Goldstein, a spokesman for the anti-Yards group Develop Don’t Destroy Brooklyn, echoed Yassky.

“If Ratner can’t build his project — with over $300 million in direct cash subsidy, over $2 billion in government-backed financing, a blank city check for ‘extraordin­ary infrastructure costs,’ free land from the city, a below-market rail yard purchase price, and the windfall benefits of eminent domain condemnation — he should not be rewarded with yet more taxpayer funds,” Goldstein said.

Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Reader Feedback

Norman Oder says:
The Atlantic Yards Report, "a web site," is as legitimate a source of Atlantic Yards news as the New York Observer or the Brooklyn Paper. Here's a link to the original report:
http://atlanticyardsreport.blogspot.com/2008/04/forest-city-tells-investment-analysts.html
April 10, 2008, 9:44 pm
brokeland from downtown says:
AYR is much more legitimate than those other sources.

the derogatory "a Web site" is offensive. who cares where the information is published as long as it has a track record of legitimacy, accuracy and thoroughness.
April 11, 2008, 1:40 am
bob from brooklyn heights says:
it seems that calling atlantic yards report "a web site" lets readers know where to find it. maybe i'm missing something here. how is the phrase "a web site" "offensive"?
April 11, 2008, 6:50 am
Gersh Kuntzman (Brooklyn Paper) from Park Slope says:
For the record, we wrote "a Web site" so that people could find Norman Oder's fine coverage, not for any derogatory purposes.

Please.

GERSH KUNTZMAN
Editor
The Brooklyn Paper
April 11, 2008, 10:35 am
Jim from Park Slope says:
While no offense was intended, I'm sure, it would have been more correct to credit the Atlantic Yards Report first, since the Observer based their article on Norman Oder's work. The way it was presented doesn't make that clear at all.

BTW, the Atlantic Yards Report is, I believe, a blog. An amazingly researched, professional, and informative volunteer blog that deserves every bit of recognition and respect that can be shown. Come join us in the 21st Century, it's a very cool town!
April 12, 2008, 12:21 am
Norman Oder says:
The Observer didn't base its article on my work. The Observer missed the story. The Observer should've been ignored in the Brooklyn Paper's article.

Gersh may think this is splitting hairs, but calling AYR "a web site" without more context is insufficient.
April 12, 2008, 12:50 am
Dee Foster from Bedford Stuyvesant says:
SCRAP THIS "PROJECT" ALREADY. IT WAS A BAD IDEA FROM THE VERY BEGINNING. SCAM ARTIST.
April 13, 2008, 7:03 pm
T Bone from E Village says:
Bruce Ratner needs to walk away from this big mess. What you created on papers looks good but it doesn't appear to meet reality.
April 13, 2008, 11:03 pm
Charles from Brooklyn says:
Two billion dollars.
TWO BILLION DOLLARS. T W O B I L L I O N D O L L A R S.

What word am I looking for? Oh, yeh ... Disgraceful. This project needs to be killed like a rabid dog.
April 15, 2008, 12:17 pm
Ace from New Utrecht says:
why was this nonsense "approved" if the the financing was not in place?
April 17, 2008, 12:50 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.