Today’s news:

‘Slave’ doll embroils Pratt

for The Brooklyn Paper

A student art project with racial overtones was hastily taken down from the walls of Pratt Institute — and now the art and design school’s administration is scrambling to respond to it.

The project consisted of a black doll and a clay figure with chains wrapped around their necks and labels reading, “Slave for Sale” and “Special offer: Buy one, get babies free.”

The piece was dated March 25, 1807 — 201 years to the day from when the unsigned piece was installed.

Campus security took it down within hours of its installation — but news of the controversial work started trickling out of the security office.

Eventually, Pratt President Thomas Schutte formed a committee to investigate the matter, which met for the first time on Friday, April 25, four weeks after the incident.

The identity of the students is unknown, but a source told The Brooklyn Paper that the artwork was created in response to an assignment given by a teacher.

It is unclear whether or not the piece got a passing grade.

Correction

May 1, 2008; 3:02 pm — Pratt Institute President Thomas Schutte did not, in fact, meet with a committee last Friday. Rather, he was scheduled to meet with a professor with knowledge of the matter individually on Friday, May 2. A spokesperson for Pratt said the institute had not yet determined whether the work was student-made.

Pin It
Print this story Permalink

Reader Feedback

Oscar Robertson from Cincinnati says:
Even now I wonder: Did they think we'd riot because we were primitive animals, beasts who could do nothing but destroy, or maybe, just maybe, did they worry bcause they knew we had good cause and were entitled to our rage ?
April 27, 2008, 7:26 pm
Michael from Bay Ridge says:
Is art not allowed to be controversial anymore? Is the message that we are only allowed to express ideas that are so bland and seperate from our real experiences that no one could possibly be offended by them?
We really ought to address the underlying reasons as to why people would be offended by images (such as still existing racial attitudes held over from the slave days, the existence of slavery in our own time in other parts of the world) rather than censoring the people who choose to bring the conversation forward.
April 28, 2008, 11:55 am

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Links