Today’s news:

Tale of two rallies

The Brooklyn Paper

Union hardhats faced off against with stroller moms — and a half-dozen local elected officials — at rival protests in the footprint of the proposed Atlantic Yards project on Saturday.

The 800 union men — and one or two women — said they want the mega-development to proceed full steam ahead, while some 400 project opponents demanded a “time out” so that state authorities could renegotiate the “sweetheart” deal that is funneling an estimated $2 billion in taxpayer subsidizes to Ratner to build a bulky project that will tower over low-rise Prospect Heights.

“Ratner’s plan isn’t good for the neighborhood — it’s too big and it’s too expensive,” said Jane Buckwalter of Park Slope.

But even at the loudest moments of the “Time Out” rally, which featured many local politicians and live music, the larger, pro-Atlantic Yards counterprotest roared its support for the project that once called for a Frank Gehry-designed arena and a string of skyscrapers between Flatbush and Vanderbilt avenues, but has apparently been trimmed down to just the arena and two or three towers.

Even if the project is shrinking, union members say they’re ready to get started.

“It’s tough to find work right now,” said Mike Quinones, a member of the Local 926 United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America who is currently unemployed. “We want to see this project built because we need these jobs.”

Opponents agree that construction workers need jobs — they just want the workers constructing something else.

“Just because we don’t want the arena to happen doesn’t mean we don’t want development,” said Lillian Hope of Prospect Heights. “We’re not saying they shouldn’t have jobs. We just don’t want them working to build Ratner’s vision.”

Others said that union members should have joined the anti-Ratner rally, given that the developer originally promised 15,000 union construction jobs, but has since admitted that Atlantic Yards will employ 1,500 construction workers per year over its proposed 10-year buildout.

“Protest Ratner, he’s the one not building and he’s the one who proposed a project that couldn’t happen or get financing,” said Daniel Goldstein of Develop Don’t Destroy Brooklyn.

Though Goldstein sought common ground, the standoff between camps was tense — especially when a group of protestors from the pro-Yards rally looped around the “Time Out” demonstration, surrounding the opponents of the project. Police officers, with plastic handcuffs dangling from their belts, formed a human wall that halted the energetic, though nonviolent, procession.

The large pro-Yards turnout was a result, in part, of union rules that require workers to participate in such protests.

“Every active member … will be called upon to contribute one day per calendar year … for picket duty,” reads the “mandatory union activities” page on the District Council of Carpenters’ Web site.

No elected officials joined the Yards supporters as they marched from Ratner’s Atlantic Terminal Mall to the site of the anti-Yards rally on Pacific Street.

Outnumbered but unfazed, opponents of Atlantic Yards alleged that the pro-Yards drew such large numbers because union members are required to march, but workers insisted that they weren’t compensated for their time.

“We’re not on the clock,” said carpenter Daniel Monjarrez. “We came out to make sure that this project gets built and that it gets union built. What did I get for coming? A T-shirt, that’s it.”

Pin It
Print this story Permalink

Reader Feedback

Mark from Prospect Heights says:
Build it Already!
May 10, 2008, 5:13 am
Peter from Fort Greene says:
I would say that your count of the anti-Yards rally was off. We had more than 400 hundred protesters. And while our protest built up steam as the day went along the pro-rally started to dissipate and wane. Kind of a microcosm of this entire process, don't you think? Ratner's efforts to form a counter protest only shows how desperate he is. If he's so confident that his project is going to be built why does he need to rally the troops?

To suggest that pro-rally was "non-violent" was only a result of police presence. I heard them yelling "We're gonna kick your ass." And they were constantly trying to enter our rally to form a bullying presence. It's a sad day when the unions show up to bully those who are protesting injustice. Whose side Woody Guthrie be one in this fight, the side of the mega-developer looking to turn a profit or the side of those looking to protect their neighborhoods and keep brooklyn right-sized?

"Jobs" for the sake of "jobs" is a hollow argument if there is no regard for the effect of the project on our communities. Maybe these construction unions would like to tear up all of Brooklyn, all the parks, brownstone, tree-lined streets, and local stores, for the sake of "jobs."
May 10, 2008, 8:23 am
Peter from Fort Greene says:
Also, thanks for covering the protest and doing such great and thorough work.
May 10, 2008, 8:31 am
Hooker from Brooklyn says:
You can build a whore house and that would still bring union jobs. This project is ridiculous....not the only way to get jobs. Its so small minded to think that this is the only way to create housing and jobs for low income people. You people took the bait hook line and STINKER!

I hear Ratner pays all those guys a big wad of cash for showing up. They get their money from their big poppa ratner
May 11, 2008, 4:50 pm
TR from Park Slope says:
Sorry to hear the unions being such idiots on this issue. Can't wait until this project is dropped and Ratner is forced to sell the Nets back to New Jersey where they belong!
May 12, 2008, 12:27 pm
Natalie Burrows from Cobble Hill, Brooklyn says:
The primary reason for this kind of building project should be to provide affordable and appropriate housing for Brooklyn residents of the area. The construction workers who protested this goal were aided and abetted by the Ratner development conpany. Most if not all do not even live in the neighborhood.
That and the fact that taxes from all New Yorkers will be used to subsidize the Ratner project is reason enough to demand a "Time Out" until a fairer and more reasonable housing project can be designed with community input.

May 12, 2008, 1:17 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Links