Dem boss wants to take Pfizer site

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Drug giant Pfizer has slammed a proposal by two state assemblymen to seize the company’s abandoned Williamsburg plant.

The former factory site, where Pfizer was founded in 1849, would be snatched away from the multi-billion-dollar corporation and redeveloped by the state as “affordable housing” if Assemblymen Vito Lopez (D–Williamsbu­rg) and Joseph Lentol (D–Greenpoint) get their way. Lopez is the boss of the Brooklyn Democratic Party organization.

The two legislators say they will introduce a bill that would have the state use its power of eminent domain to grab the 660,000-square-foot plant that Pfizer closed a year ago, as well as a massive parking lot behind the plant and several other Pfizer buildings on 15 acres along Flushing Avenue between Marcy and Tompkins avenues.

Following the seizure, the state agency would seek developers to build between 1,500 and 1,700 units of affordable housing, a Lopez spokesman said.

The Pfizer compound today bears little resemblance to the small laboratory and manufacturing facility where the drug giant began as a small-time family operation. From that single building, the company rose to number 39 on the Fortune 500 — a pharmaceutical juggernaut second in the industry only to Johnson & Johnson.

Lopez says Pfizer broke its promise to donate its property to be redeveloped as affordable housing when it shuttered the plant and laid-off 600 workers in January, 2007.

Pfizer says it made no such promise, but added that it is planning to redevelop the site to bring low- and moderate-income housing to a neighborhood whose population is booming. That plan is still on track, Pfizer says, and Lopez’s move to take away its property is premature.

“Pfizer recently shared development scenarios for our Brooklyn properties with elected officials and stakeholde­rs,” a Pfizer spokesman said. “We made it clear that our plans would be based on principles ranging from the inclusion of affordable housing and job creation to minority contracting opportunities.

“Within the context of these principles, we find it puzzling that a legislator would propose a government seizure of private property to redevelop the properties with the same uses we are considering.”

Lopez fired back last week, saying that what Pfizer calls “affordable housing” could be considered luxury apartments by community standards.

“Affordable housing is not for people who are making $150,000 a year,” Lopez told The Brooklyn Paper. “For me, affordable housing in Williamsburg means meeting the needs of the people who are earning between $30,000 and $50,000 a year and there is no guarantee from Pfizer that they will meet that need.”

Though the rhetoric coming from both sides sounds bitter, Brad Lander of the Pratt Center for Community Development says it doesn’t have to be public-private slugfest.

“Pfizer could be a partner in a public process, and I would strongly prefer a public process over a private one.” said Lander. “Pfizer could agree to sell the property to the city, state or a non-profit, yet retain some rights about what happens on its land.

“Pfizer says it will include affordable housing, but it is also looking to maximize its sale price, which will come at the expense of affordable housing,” Lander added. “And that’s why I have a problem with the redevelopment being a strictly private process.”

Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Reader Feedback

butcher from williamsburg says:
I love free stuff, but don't take it away from from one to give it to others. That i call stealing; let it be a local government or the federal government. If its not for public use, as a highway or subway usage, the government has no business taking someone's property away.

Democrats, if we loose the property right in USA, whats left of this once great country?
Jan. 25, 2008, 10:42 am
Shoshanna from Williamsburg says:
Here we go again corrupt so called community leaders like the Kestenbaums from the ODA and Neiderrman from UJO with Vito lopez are trying to dip into Pfizer pockets..I hope Pfizer will not scumb to these thiefs
The Schafer landing development On Kent Where David Niederman was so called fighting for affordable housing for the community . This is what the community got and folks you could verify it: Neiderman Got $900,000 Sponsor Fee.
The communty was to get 40 affordable unit that would be distributed by a drawing but somehow 15 units went to Rabbi neidermans and Kestenbaums from the ODA"s children and realtives

They Both are muti milloners and they only benefit their freinds and pockets

Jan. 25, 2008, 10:55 am
Rachel from Williamsburg says:
I would like to add my two cents. If Louis ( Lezer ) or his son Joel Kestenbaum are involved in this Pfizer land grab then the only people thats wil gain will be louis or joel kestenbaum the community will not see an Ioda nothing anything,,History has proven that these guys are thiefs that line their own pockets only
Jan. 27, 2008, 11:24 am
chris Garcia from Williamsburg says:
skittles. The hipster ——.
May 5, 2008, 1:22 am

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.