The Brooklyn Paper: Burgers: City ‘Kent’ get it right
The current issue
Neighborhood Map
Bay Ridge
  • Bensonhurst, Dyker Heights
Brooklyn Heights
  • Downtown, DUMBO
Carroll Gardens
  • Cobble Hill, Red Hook, Boerum Hill
Fort Greene
  • Clinton Hill, Crown Heights
North Brooklyn
  • Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Bushwick
Park Slope
  • Prospect Heights, Windsor Terrace, Greenwood Heights
GO Brooklyn
Dining Guide
Where to GO
Events calendar
Classifieds
The Brooklyn Wire
Not Just Nets
Police Blotter
Perspective
Parenting
Politics
Transit
Podcasts
Brooklyn Cyclones
Merchant news
About The Paper
RSS Feeds
CNG Boro Politics

Burgers: City ‘Kent’ get it right

The Brooklyn Paper

The city unveiled its latest Kent Avenue bike lane plan — this time seeking to bring peace to warring bicyclists, motorists and business owners — but Williamsburg’s inland residents claim the new proposal only makes matters worse.

The Department of Transportation’s new plan, presented on Wednesday night, would turn the currently two-way, truck-heavy avenue into a one-way, northbound street — with a protected two-way bike lane on the waterfront side of the roadway.

The agency says its proposal — which could be implemented as early as July — would reduce speeding on Kent Avenue and restore more than 200 parking spaces and loading zones. The department’s bid to end the fighting over the bike lane that began six months ago when newly painted lanes replaced hundreds of badly needed parking spaces and truck loading zones on both sides of Kent Avenue.

The current proposal would divert southbound truck traffic off Kent Avenue at North 14th Street — where the one-way section of the thoroughfare would begin. The detoured trucks would turn south on Wythe Avenue for three blocks until North 11th Street, where signs would direct the trucks to veer east across the neighborhood towards an existing truck route on Union Avenue.

As a result, some inland Williamsburg residents — a new group of opponents in the tumultuous conflict over the bike lanes — fear that Wythe Avenue would become a big-rig highway.

“It’s mayhem!” said Williamsburg activist Stephanie Eisenberg, who was one of many residents at the crowded meeting to claim that truck traffic is a major quality of life concern in North Brooklyn. “With all of these new residential communities, how are you going to reactivate a truck route?”

“If the bike lanes are the tipping point, you should get rid of one of them,” she added.

Grand Street resident Tim Main agreed.

“Kent Avenue is a natural thoroughfare,” said Main, who called for two-way traffic on Kent and a one-way bike lane. “Closing it down to traffic in one direction would be like closing the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway in one direction.”

But Department of Transportation Deputy Commissioner David Woloch insisted that the current proposal is the best solution for the neighborhood’s cyclists, motorists and business owners.

“Right now we have a situation on Kent Avenue that is not working,” he said. “After a lot of thinking about it, we think this is the best plan and the only plan we can go forward with. There is not a perfect plan that is going to satisfy everybody. We think far and away this is the plan that has the most wins for everybody and the fewest losses.”

Some people at the crowded meeting agreed on the need for a two-way bike lane on the waterfront side of the street, which would become part of the proposed Brooklyn Waterfront Greenway, an uninterrupted cycling and walking path that would stretch from Greenpoint to Sunset Park.

“It defines the space so the community can anticipate and start to make room for [the Greenway],” said Greenway Director of Planning Milton Puryear. “It’s a much more informed approach.”

The new proposal has also found a surprising ally among factions of South Williamsburg’s Satmar community — groups that took early and aggressive stances against the Kent Avenue lanes when they were installed last fall.

“It’s the city and you’ve got to give and take,” said former bike lane opponent Leo Moskowitz. “If the bikers and the business owners are accommodated, it’s a win-win.”

Reader Feedback

No2Isaac from willyburg says:
Were r the hasidic gangsters? ... working on their english i hope...lol
Thursday, May 28, 2009 at 3:51 pm
Bob from Williamsburg says:
A special thanks for Williamsburg activist and candidate Isaac Abraham for working for our community for the last 35 years especially this bike lane issue for the last 7 months this is a perfect example
How he is dedicating his time and afford so everybody will be happy biker. residents and business owners, we need people like you, we wish your a lots of luck at your campaign!!!
Thursday, May 28, 2009 at 4:22 pm
Linda from Greenpoint says:
This is a very good plan, i think everybody likes this idea; it’s always good to listen to the people on Kent Av. I heard they came up with this idea may god bless them, that community is smart and always trying very hard and finely DOT was ready to take this to reality and ready to implement on month of July, that’s a big accomplishment
Thursday, May 28, 2009 at 4:33 pm
Hopper from Los Sures says:
Where exactly is the "existing truck route" on Union Ave? Where does it rejoin Kent Ave? Via Flushing Ave? Already a gridlocked, potholed mess. Seems like a heck of alot of traffic to divert through residential neighborhoods for the sake of 100 cyclists
per day.
Thursday, May 28, 2009 at 4:52 pm
Mike from Ft Greene says:
DOT presentation: http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/kent_ave.pdf
Thursday, May 28, 2009 at 5:47 pm
Cars are not evil from earth says:
More madness from the critical mass lunatics that are causing catastrophic traffic jams all over NYC. You are not going to make the automobile disappear by making drivers as miserable as possible like you are trying to do. All you are doing is increasing asthma rates across NYC while cars idle outside their homes while stuck in gridlock created by the flat earth society.
Thursday, May 28, 2009 at 9:29 pm
ms nomer from williamspoint says:
To Hopper: Most of Union Avenue is a local truck route. At the north end it starts at Richardson and ends at the BQE (crossing Kent Avenue and then ending).

To Cars Are Not Evil: Cars aren't evil but traffic is killing us. The real lunacy lies in doing nothing to provide alternatives to cars in a dense city like New York. And actually... around the US and around the world, aggressive transportation planning has in fact reduced car dependence. Drivers should encourage cycling -- bikes represent that many cars you DON'T have to compete with for space on the road and parking at the curb.
Friday, May 29, 2009 at 1:00 am
Steve from Boerum Hill says:
This is a much better idea. Bravo. And isn't Wythe Avenue already a southbound truck route? It runs parallel to Kent so what's the problem?
Friday, May 29, 2009 at 10:37 am
Steve from Boerum Hill says:
Oh wow, Wythe is not a truck route. Why wouldn't you make Wythe a truck route? It's mostly a commercial avenue already and it parallels Kent.
Friday, May 29, 2009 at 10:41 am
Ryan Lee from Greenpoint says:
This article doesn't mention illegalities of using Kent, and now Wythe, as a truck thoroughfare which is the source of the problem to begin with. The truck routes in question are for local deliveries only, as I understand it. This was discussed at the committee meeting.

The reporter could be more thorough in his analysis if the intent of this article is compose an accurate portrayal of the issues.
Friday, May 29, 2009 at 11:06 am
K. from Outside the bubble says:
You might think that the hassidic community would be more inclined to promote bicycle use, given the fact that they are buying the gasoline for their cars from the Iranians ( you know, those guys with the atomic bombs that want to wipe Israel off the face of the map ) and the Saudis ( you know, those guys who dropped a few passenger planes onto our WTC ). You might think that. But then, you'd be wrong, wouldn't you...
Friday, May 29, 2009 at 12:58 pm
cars are not evil from earth says:
ms nomer: I encourage everyone to use bikes when and if they are healthy enough to do so. Taking away Kent Ave is going to nothing but cause more gridlock for the rest of the neighborhood, and is a terrible waste of valuable space. For a TWO LANE bike path AND a divider? That is just ridiculous.

The best solution is to keep Kent Ave as a 2 way street, with a bike path on the water side of the street so there is no loss of parking. The final part of the solution is to enforce the speeding laws, and having bikes and cars share the road (and police enforcement) is the best way to keep speeders in check.
Saturday, May 30, 2009 at 2:21 am
ms nomer from williamspoint says:
Personally I think road-sharing is a much better solution overall, rather than going to the expense of striping and maintaining bike lanes. Hopefully New Yorkers will evolve to a point where street users treat each other with respect. Till then... there isn't enough police presence on the streets as it is, so this is the plan.

What I think is a waste of space, is giving curbside car parking for free to anyone who is lucky enough to snag a parking spot. Free parking has encourage car ownership which in turn has increased traffic and gridlock. Seriously, don't blame the bikes, we've had car traffic problems for years. The bikes represent an alternative to cars. Yes, some people really and truly do need car access for work, for health reasons, etc. I would think they'd be glad for a little less competition on the roads and when parking.

Also, it's important to note that this bike lane/divider plan from the DOT is an interim proposal. A greenway is in the works and that will provide broad benefits: cleaner air, safe biking AND WALKING for residents (you can actually go walk or bike with your kids without fear of vehicle conflicts!), stormwater management, and a green, visual break from all the hard, concrete development along that strip.
Saturday, May 30, 2009 at 12:55 pm
ms nomer from williamspoint says:
Personally I think road-sharing is a much better solution overall, rather than going to the expense of striping and maintaining bike lanes. Hopefully New Yorkers will evolve to a point where street users treat each other with respect. Till then... there isn't enough police presence on the streets as it is, so this is the plan.

What I think is a waste of space, is giving curbside car parking for free to anyone who is lucky enough to snag a parking spot. Free parking has encouraged car ownership which in turn has increased traffic and gridlock. Seriously, don't blame the bikes, we've had car traffic problems for years. The bikes represent an alternative to cars. Yes, some people really and truly do need car access for work, for health reasons, etc. I would think they'd be glad for a little less competition on the roads and when parking.

Also, it's important to note that this bike lane/divider plan from the DOT is an interim proposal. A greenway is in the works and that will provide broad benefits: cleaner air, safe biking AND WALKING for residents (you can actually go walk or bike with your kids without fear of vehicle conflicts!), stormwater management, and a green, visual break from all the hard, concrete development along that strip.
Saturday, May 30, 2009 at 12:56 pm
Mike from Greenpoint says:
As a cyclist, I think this seems like a perfectly viable compromise. I hope everyone else is happy with this plan too.
Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 2:28 am
Jim from Kent Av. says:
WOW,, this is accomplishment, the people of Williamsburg know how to fight they are the best....
Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 2:30 am
Kevin from Williamsburg says:
People it’s about time to bake the donates!! It comes to a point everybody like this idea residence, business owners, and cyclist, that’s a compliment,
Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 2:32 am
Ed from Brooklyn says:
This isn't a 100% return of car parking. There's a significant return of loading zones for the businesses, who were struggling with deliveries when parking was taken away. The car parking taht is being returned, is going to be used as a physical buffer for cyclists -- ironic that cars are being used to protect cyclists and walkers from... cars! But a great approach all around.
Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 2:34 am
Len from williamsburg says:
i hope this this idea will be ready this summer so everybody will have a good time....
Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 3:20 pm
meredith from williamsburg says:
Diverting traffic down north 11 th is a dangerous idea. Have you been to the intersection of North 11th btw Roebling and Union?
It is only as LONG as one tractor trailer. Cars making the right turn off Roebling will rear end any truck stopped at Union , unless they are going under 10 miles per hour. There are so many pedestrians with their eyes on Mccarren Park in front of them, that there will be a tragedy sooner rather than later. I am all for bike routes , greenways etc , but trucks on N 11th is a dangerous way to reach that end. The parallel route of using Wythe avenue, although not appealing to the residents there that want to hold onto their prime parking situation, is going to have to compromise convenience for safety, for the good of all.
Tuesday, Jun 2, 2009 at 2:21 pm
meredith from williamsburg says:
Diverting traffic down north 11 th is a dangerous idea. Have you been to the intersection of North 11th btw Roebling and Union?
It is only as LONG as one tractor trailer. Cars making the right turn off Roebling will rear end any truck stopped at Union , unless they are going under 10 miles per hour. There are so many pedestrians with their eyes on McCarren Park in front of them, that there will be a tragedy sooner rather than later. I am all for bike routes , greenways etc , but trucks on N 11th is a dangerous way to reach that end. The parallel route of using Wythe avenue, although not appealing to the residents there that want to hold onto their prime parking situation, is going to have to compromise convenience for safety, for the good of all.
Tuesday, Jun 2, 2009 at 2:25 pm
Christianne from Greenpoint says:
TUESDAY JUNE 9 TH AT 6 PM 211 Ainslie street
THE SWINGIN' SENIORS CENTER WILL HOST A SHOW DOWN ON THIS ISSUE.
Please come and voice your unwelcomed opinion. Bear in mind, that the schmucks you bought your overpriced condo from, are the same guys that want to run trucks down your street , instead of down their own. What is fair about that? Nothing.
Tuesday, Jun 2, 2009 at 2:52 pm
Joe from Kent Av. says:
I understand your concern about some truckers, at the other hand this plan fits for everybody business, residences, and bikers, DOT is working very hard
To salve these problems, try to understand it will always be people complaining, Kent Av. is a dangers highway for people especially for kids and bikers, Kent Av. is a rezoned area with a lots of families and condos its not safe at al!!, so far it’s a perfect plan 98% are happy so DOT is first trying out if its working they will make some changes if necessary,
Tuesday, Jun 2, 2009 at 4:27 pm
Bruce from Williamsburg says:
Oh, please. Rabbi Teitlebaum and his crew of "developers" in the Greenpoint williamsburg area have had the DOB, and taxes and finance in their pocket for awhile now. Why wouldn't the DOT want a piece of the action, and let them have it play out their way?
Tuesday, Jun 2, 2009 at 5:12 pm
Ashley from Park Slope says:
to kay from outside the bubble,
I hate to sound like the school marm , but the hassidic community doesn't care one bit about Israel. (it's part and parcel to their entire dogma) Brooklyn and points outward ARE the promised land. We just get to live in it's ever expanding domain. I say expanding, because there is a notion that the hassidics were "here first". Not true, but they were smart enough to pool amongst their peers, and buy and develop larger projects than North Brooklyn's earlier "settlers" ever had. The city sees the dollar signs, and the deal is done. This isn't a city that has ever been good at foresight and planning its infrastructure. Temporary fixes are standard operating procedure in NYC.
Tuesday, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:11 pm
Nicole from Williamsburg says:
"The new proposal has also found a surprising ally among factions of South Williamsburg’s Satmar community — groups that took early and aggressive stances against the Kent Avenue lanes when they were installed last fall."

Yes , and only because the Satmars don't want the trucks to barrel down Wythe, and deprive them of one side of the street for parking their cars, and all the noise & carbon monoxide.

“Right now we have a situation on Kent Avenue that is not working,” he said. “After a lot of thinking about it, we think this is the best plan and the only plan we can go forward with. There is not a perfect plan that is going to satisfy everybody. We think far and away this is the plan that has the most wins for everybody and the fewest losses.”-David Wolloch

Fewest losses? The potential for fatalities will rise exponentially if the trucks use this proposed route. Have you talked to engineers about this idea? Just walk the route today and take a look/see of the intersection of N. 11th. between Roebling & Union. Even if traffic lights are installed along this route , it is still dangerous to the masses of pedestrians on their way to the park.

Keep the trucks on Kent avenue, until a less horrible plan is come up with.
Wednesday, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:35 am
Dav from Greenpoint says:
Nicole let me try to explain, Kent Av, the way its now is not working for the business they can’t get delivers and pick ups and the same time residence are suffering because lake of parking Etc.
So far this idea is a perfect plan so everybody business, residence, and the bikers, will benefit together at the same time, so far the way Kent Av. is as of now is very dangers especially people are driving 45-50 mph. like on a highway, now its will be one way so nobody will pass any red flashes at the school buses.
Thursday, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:00 am
Sarah from Williamsburg says:
It is a "perfect plan" for YOUR self-centered agenda , Dav.
It is not a safe plan for those of us on N. 14th and N 11th street or anyone headed to McCarren park. The drivers that fly down Roebling street to make the turn onto N 11 th will crash into trucks and cars waiting to make the turn onto Union. Just freaking admit it. This is about you not wanting to address the ill-conceived changes made to Kent avenue. Find a parallel route (down Wythe) You just don't want to have trucks roll down your street. We don't want them either. If I wanted to live on a known truck route I would have bought a condo from your people on Kent (which has always been "like a highway"); instead of the own I got on a residential street. Quit masking and lying about the real issue. And stop acting like we are not a part of this "everybody" you purport to represent.
Thursday, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:54 pm
richard from wmsburg says:
Let me get this right. For those of us living on North 11th between Roebling and Driggs, this block is now going to be a heavily trafficked truck route morning noon and night? somebody please post about this!
Wednesday, Jun 24, 2009 at 3:18 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Brooklyn Paper Parent
Water Street Restaurant