Councilman Domenic Recchia (right) was the lead badgerer of city officials at a hearing over Coney Island on Wednesday.

Similar stories

Coney Island: Full Council passes Mayor Bloomberg’s broad vision for Coney amusements, housing

Coney Island: Council: Bloomy Coney rezoney is no baloney

Coney Island: Albany throws Bloomy a rabbit punch in Coney

Coney Island: Theme park experts urge city to ‘Disney-fy’ Coney

Coney Island: Marty loves Bloomy’s Coney rezoney

Coney Island: Sitt not on it — Joe’s Coney ‘Festival’ suffers setback

Tools

Print this story

digg

del.icio.us

Email a friend

Your name

Your email address

Recipients’ email addresses (Up to ten, separated by commas.)

Mayor Bloomberg’s controversial plan to redevelop Coney Island came under a blistering attack from a hostile City Council committee last week.

It was a theatrical spectacle as members of the Land Use and Franchise Committee badgered Bloomberg administration officials on the details of a plan to rezone a large area between the Cyclone roller coaster and the Keyspan Park minor-league baseball stadium to build a theme park, hotels, and attractions, plus 4,500 apartments.

The committee, following the lead of Councilman Domenic Recchia (D–Coney Island), who was shouting from the start, aggressively questioned Bloomberg’s emissaries on the possible use of eminent domain to acquire land for the proposed city-owned amusement park and the plan’s need for accompanying legislation in dysfunctional Albany.

Recchia insisted that the city directly say if it would condemn land — specifically, the 10-1/2 acres owned by his friend, Joe Sitt — to pursue its transformation of the shrinking amusement area.

“This is reality. This is not a hypothetical. This is my community,” Recchia yelled at Seth Pinsky, president of the city’s Economic Development Corporation at last Wednesday’s hearing.

“Yes or no?” Recchia insisted.

Pinsky deflected the question, saying, “We do not intend to use eminent domain.” But later, after several other councilmembers followed the same line of attack, Pinsky said he could not rule out using the city’s condemnation power if a deal could not be negotiated with Sitt and three smaller landowners whose property is inside the nine-acre amusement zone.

Mayor Bloomberg envisions another 18 acres of privately owned attractions and hotels adjacent to the theme park that would create a year-round tourist destination. The ensuing economic influx would allow private developers to build housing on largely vacant land and parking lots to the west and north of this amusement zone.

The plan ran into additional trouble with the committee, which was almost entirely critical of the mayor’s proposal, over a technical issue requiring state legislation.

The portion of the plan, which calls for housing on what is now the Keyspan Stadium parking lot and currently mapped as parkland, would require state approval so it can be used for residential development. But so far, no Albany lawmaker has been willing to introduce a bill to do just that.

“It’s almost as if the entire project is dependent on a body that you have no support in,” Councilwoman Melinda Katz (D–Queens) told Pinsky.

City officials said that state approval is a chicken-and-egg thing. If the Council supports Bloomberg’s rezoning plan, the Assembly and Senate would follow suit, these officials claim.

©2009 The Brooklyn Paper

Links