All Brooklyn news
Neighborhood Map
Bay Ridge
  • Bensonhurst, Dyker Heights
Brooklyn Heights
  • Downtown, DUMBO
Carroll Gardens
  • Cobble Hill, Red Hook, Boerum Hill
Fort Greene
  • Clinton Hill, Crown Heights
North Brooklyn
  • Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Bushwick
Park Slope
  • Prospect Heights, Windsor Terrace, Greenwood Heights
GO Brooklyn
Dining Guide
Where to GO
Events calendar
Classifieds
The Brooklyn Wire
Not Just Nets
Police Blotter
Perspective
Parenting
Politics
Transit
Podcasts
Brooklyn Cyclones
Special sections
About The Paper
Mobile site
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds

Buzzy prepares his sue-fflé over arborcidal artwork

for The Brooklyn Paper

The posh River Café has dished up a $3-million complaint against everyone associated with last summer’s tree-killing Waterfalls art installation, charging that salty mist from the falls damaged the eatery’s manicured grounds and facilities.

The complaint, filed in Brooklyn Supreme Court on June 29, blames everyone from the city Parks and Recreation Department to the artist Olafur Eliasson for killing trees and warping the windows, lighting and painting, among other alleged misfortunes, due to the design and location of the man-made cascade beneath the Brooklyn Bridge.

The suit says that the River Café, owned by Michael “Buzzy” O’Keeffe, “continues to suffer damage and business loss as a result of the defendant’s negligence.”

Despite the court paperwork seeking $2.983 million in damages, O’Keeffe told The Brooklyn Paper that “the River Café is not suing anyone.” He declined to elaborate.

Earlier in the week, he was more talkative. He told the New York Post, the Manhattan tabloid that first reported the litigation, that the spray from the Waterfalls “left the place destroyed.”

“They did nothing. They knew it was happening, but the waterfall kept on going,” O’Keeffe told the Post.

The the Public Art Fund denied that Eliasson’s art spigot caused substantial briny harm.

“Trees and other vegetation impacted by the waterfalls have almost without exception shown excellent new growth this spring. The few trees that may need to be specifically addressed are being addressed,” said Gabby Fisher, a spokeswoman for the group. The lawsuit culminates almost a year of denunciations by O’Keeffe and others in Brooklyn Heights about damage inflicted on flora from the nearby cataract.

Last October, the Brooklyn Heights Association revealed a soil study that showed levels of salt 10 times higher than normal in samples taken from the River Café. The report also showed elevated levels on the fabled Promenade, though far lower than at the refined restaurant.

That high-sodium diet allegedly contributed to the silent spring in the Weeping Birches at the River Cafe, as the trees failed or delayed to grow new leaves.

The Brooklyn Heights Association says however that foliage on the Promenade recuperated from the misty monster.

“The plants are coming back,” said Judy Stanton, the group’s executive director. “The Parks Department did a soil test and the levels were normal.”

The waterfall near the River Café was one of four included in Eliasson’s landscape East River exhibit, which ran from June to October.

Reader Feedback

Robert from Park Slope says:
$69 million for the city’s economy! Where do they come up with those numbers? I have a hard time believing people visited the city only for the purpose of seeing that show of leaky spigots.
July 9, 2009, 1:33 pm
Big Lou from Carroll Gardens says:
O'Keefe is a douche. He cries one second and then the next second says everything is great.
Why give this di-k any space? He just fibbed to this paper. F the di-k.
July 10, 2009, 5:21 am
John Mahoney from Greenpoint says:
Those "waterfalls" were a joke, one of the least satisfying public art projects I have seen. This really adds a new layer to the debacle.
July 10, 2009, 11:46 am
Eazy D from Sheepshead Bay says:
Yo Gee, bring back some smoke from your trip so the Douche who owns the River Cafe can plant it.
looks like buzzy needs to be buzzed
July 13, 2009, 1:33 am

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Links