Sections

Concrete plant plan is a real Red Hook dust up

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

The planned opening of a concrete plant in Red Hook has flown into a cloud of opposition from residents who fear the company will release harmful airborne dust into homes, parks and a small-scale organic farm.

US Concrete, the publicly traded industrial conglomerate, says its facility, scheduled to open this year next to the Ikea on Beard Street, will meet all regulations and may actually be less harmful than the unused manufacturing lot on which it will be built.

“We think the dust coming off the site will be less than if it was [still] a vacant lot,” said Michael Gentoso, a regional vice president for US Concrete. The local business will be a subsidiary called Eastern Concrete.

“We have excellent safety records. We have excellent community records,” he said last Thursday in a meeting with Red Hook residents. He also said that he hoped that the prospect of unionized jobs would appeal to neighbors.

But neighbors are dubious, especially because they believe US Company carried out demolition work without obtaining requisite permits, though the company claimed it was a “clean-up” and not actual demolition work.

City zoning currently ensures that much of Red Hook’s land remains restricted to industry, including the site in question. It’s also a convenient location for the firm because of its proximity to the Gowanus Expressway and Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel.

But some say it’s too close for comfort. US Concrete’s factory would sit across the street from Added Value, a community farm, and Red Hook Park, with its sprawling athletic fields.

It is also next to the Ikea superstore, with its peaceful waterfront park.

“It’s an awkward location that should have required more study,” said John McGettrick, co-president of the Red Hook Civic Association.

McGettrick said the company should perform an environmental review before opening, but officials from the company dodged the request, neither consenting to nor rejecting it.

The complaints extend to the expected noise, exhaust and traffic from the 15 to 20 trucks that the company says it will operate from the site.

“Traffic is going to be too much. In and out. In and out,” said Lillian Marshall, tenants association president for Red Hook Houses West.

Councilwoman Sara Gonzalez (D–Red Hook) brought the two sides together for the summit meeting last week in the Red Hook Community Justice Center, but promptly left before the discussion began.

She said she was neutral about the company’s arrival in her district, but her comment suggested that her neutrality had limits.

“Children’s health is important. The park is important,” she said. But “this is not about ganging up on US Concrete.”

Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Reader Feedback

al pankin from downtown says:
a concreate plan is a real mess, go over to smith street and hamilton ave, look at the street, there's concrete muck in the street all the time, trucks block traffic. it's a real dirty place. the metal salvage yard next door is no better. these two business are a blight to the area and so will the proposed concrete plant.
Aug. 10, 2009, 8:23 am
Oren from Windsor Terrace says:
These kinds of businesses need to be somewhere.. otherwise trucks have to travel even further within the city. If you can't a business like this here, where can you do it?
Aug. 10, 2009, 11:12 am
Jon from Carroll Gardens says:
your caption is incorrect. Ian Marvy does not own the Red Hook Farm. The lot is owned by the Department of Parks and Recreation. Ian is the
executive director of Added Value, a non-profit organization which has a lease agreement with the city to use the lot as a community farm.
Aug. 10, 2009, 11:15 am
Alan from C gardens says:
I agree with Oren from Windsor Terrace.
And as the story says, "City zoning currently ensures that much of Red Hook’s land remains restricted to industry, including the site in question."
Aug. 11, 2009, 3:17 pm
Sarah from Red Hook says:
As a Red Hook resident, and an advocate and supporter of community farming, and healthy life-styles, even for New Yorkers (!) I am strongly opposed to US Concrete operating out of this location. There are already many dangerous, toxic, industrial sites operating out of the area, we need fewer potential risks to children's health and quality of life for everyone who resides in Red Hook, not more!
Aug. 13, 2009, 9:22 am
Frank from South Brooklyn says:
If those opposing US Concrete really wanted to stop it, they need to stop playing the environmental racism card (which always fails when used by upper middle class white folks) and figure out an alternate plan that will fly with their neighbors in public housing. For example, the site would be perfect for some major chain restaurants like Red Lobster or Chili's which generate very little traffic, create jobs and are extremely population with the African-American community. However, it's highly unlikely that Red Hook's notoriously snooty foodie crowd would ever stoop to shilling for a Outback Steak House.
Aug. 13, 2009, 1:16 pm
Frank from South Brooklyn says:
I meant "popular" not "population."
Aug. 13, 2009, 1:20 pm
Felix from Sunset Park says:
councilwoman is probably just waiting for US concrete to make her a "donation" so she can lobby for them
Aug. 27, 2009, 6:39 pm
Cathy from Red Hook says:
Alan - do you realize those zoning laws were made over 3 decades ago?
Sept. 17, 2009, 1:36 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.