All Brooklyn news
Neighborhood Map
Bay Ridge
  • Bensonhurst, Dyker Heights
Brooklyn Heights
  • Downtown, DUMBO
Carroll Gardens
  • Cobble Hill, Red Hook, Boerum Hill
Fort Greene
  • Clinton Hill, Crown Heights
North Brooklyn
  • Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Bushwick
Park Slope
  • Prospect Heights, Windsor Terrace, Greenwood Heights
GO Brooklyn
Dining Guide
Where to GO
Events calendar
Classifieds
The Brooklyn Wire
Not Just Nets
Police Blotter
Perspective
Parenting
Politics
Transit
Podcasts
Brooklyn Cyclones
Special sections
About The Paper
Mobile site
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
October 13, 2009 / Politics / Park Slope / Perspective / The Politicrasher

There’s a Republican in the Food Co-op!

The Brooklyn Paper

You can say this for Republican Joe Nardiello — he walks the walk.

Unfortunately, the walk on one recent weeknight was not some show of political bona-fides, but escorting home members of the Park Slope Food Co-op, that august (and extremely liberal) institution of which Nardiello is actually a member.

A Republican? In the Food Co-op? Is that a safety vest he wears or a target?

The other night, Nardiello invited The Politicrasher to join him as he did his regular monthly co-op shift, donning that reflective vest to walk home his fellow members and then bring the shopping cart back to the Mother Ship on Union Street.

Nardiello isn’t the only Co-op member running against heavily favored Democrat Brad Lander to represent Park Slope in the City Council. Green Party member David Pechefsky is also a Co-op member — prompting some in the members-only supermarket to joke that Nardiello and Pechefsky will split the all-important Park Slope Food Co-op vote, allowing Lander to cruise to an easy victory.

On this night, Nardiello hoped to take advantage of his long walks with his would-be constituents, a fringe benefit of his job as a “walker.” It was a tough night.

His first customer complained about President Bush (he’s not on the ballot).

His second customer, a woman from Bay Ridge, nearly capsized her shopping cart when Nardiello revealed his party affiliation.

“A Republican? We seriously considered moving to Canada if McCain had won,” she said.

His third customer said from the outset, “I don’t vote for Republicans, but I’ll listen to you,” before spending the entire 15 minutes never letting Nardiello get a word in.

His fourth customer also didn’t care about Nardiello’s positions.

“The older I get, the more liberal I get,” he said.

Voters wouldn’t really give Nardiello a fair hearing, so I did by giving him the Politicrasher Quiz:

• Who did he vote for in 2008? McCain. “I voted for McCain because my number one issue was protecting New York,” he said. Verdict: Bad Republican.

• What are your priorities? “Low taxes and helping small business — anything to avoid slowing commerce,” he said. “That’s why I hate this residential permit parking idea. I call it a street parking fee. More than any issue, that’s what got me into this race. Also, cars need to be slowed down.” Verdict: Good Republican.

• What kind of councilman would you be? “I want to break the old status quo. People in public service should feel it in their heart and do nothing but public service.” Verdict: Good Republican.

• Why did you become a Republican? “I was a teenager under Carter and the hostage crisis and the gas crisis really got to me. So I was attracted to Reagan.” Then again, it was RFK, not Reagan whom Nardiello quoted most. “I want to moderate the Republican party.” Verdict: Mixed.

• One key labor initiative? “We’ve lost too many dockworker jobs on the waterfront in Brooklyn.” Verdict: Loyal machine Democrat.

• Where are you on gay marriage? It was a simple question, especially for a candidate who spent the previous hour saying he was a champion of civil rights for all. But on gay marriage, Nardiello danced like Tom DeLay! It was uncanny. He couldn’t give a position!

“If it becomes law in New York State, I will support it,” he said.

Big deal; if Nardiello becomes a councilman, his first act as a lawmaker is to swear to uphold the laws of New York State. So I tried again.

“It’s a simple question, Joe: Should people be allowed to marry whomever they want to marry?”

“Right now, they can’t,” he said.

He hemmed some more about his support for this central civil right — because the bottom line is that he does not support it. Verdict: Bad Republican.

So he may walk the walk at the Co-op, but as far as I’m concerned, he only talks the talk.

Wherever there is a smoke-filled backroom or a smoke-free barroom, The Brooklyn Paper’s Politicrasher will be there, bringing you the inside dope on our next generation of leaders. Got a hot tip for the Politicrasher? E-mail Newsroom@BrooklynPaper.com.

Reader Feedback

Arch. from Fort Greene says:
Congratulations you found a Republican. What a crap article.
Oct. 13, 2009, 11:48 am
Fourth Estate from DUMBO says:
Bravo, Brooklyn Paper for another non-news article. Yeah, practice decisive politics. My hamster loves your paper to poop on.
Oct. 13, 2009, 9:33 pm
Joe Nardiello from 39th District says:
Many readers may know that I stepped forward as a 'Independent' Republican in this political climate -- to challenge the very political establishment of Brooklyn in the 39th District, one party at a time.

Nothing's been handed to me -- and there's no political orchestration behind this candidacy. People can trust me to fight for them 100%, purely. Can you please explain why I'm being called a 'bad republican' -- in the feature "There's a Republican in the Food Co-op"? In fact, I may be the best you've ever seen, up close - maybe, you're fighting that realization because of that R-word. (By the way, you don't see my Democrat-opponent at the Food Coop.)

So, there is a Candidate in the Coop, in me - and one that all 14,000 members can be proud of -- particularly with my website's calling for expansion of organic food distribution, and for examination of air pollutants our of NJ's co-generation plant across from Staten Island.

Same-sex families and couples are part of the fabric of our communities. I don't wear people on my sleeves, and won't call out same-sex friendships across decades, etc. -- just to show that I'm closer to this issue than portrayed here. There are very real aspects, relative to civil rights and decisions - especially with older couples.

However, the City Council has exactly no bearing on the debate... and as I said, there's a very real proposal with NY State upcoming, that may give protections to religion at the same time. That's important, too, to a great many people in our District -- and remember, a City Councilman doesn't simply represent people as they see fit. We have to reflect what our people want.

Please don't ever sell a lifetime short of understanding, concern and friendship for neighbors, community members and coworkers -- that live in love, in an alternative lifestyle from my own. By the way, I was a republican before Reagan, and said that I'd voted for the Independent in my 1st presidential election, which was a fellow named John Anderson.

As my website says, we have a chance to make this office about public service -- and attending to the many needs of our residents on their blocks, without worrying about political favorites or the double-talk about simply being ignored. By mid-October, no one can question my devotion to my birthplace, nor my aptitude in achieving all we can accomplish, with a pure effort.

*It's Year 3 of the Great Recession this November, and only one candidate's dealt with the economy, every day. 25 years of business development, planning, complex programs, maximizing budgets. Worked with 2 mayors and can easily work with a 3rd, in economic development and with small business services. We can bring solar power manufacturing, maybe make Brooklyn America's capital for production and usage. Defend against over-development. Sustainability? I'm the one in the Coop for 5 years. Affordability -- I'm a candidate that rents, and worked every day across 2009 to meet that rent/bills, every month. Senior Housing? New schools? I've discussed possibly using eminent domain for the public good if greater penalty doesn't thwart warehousing properties amid our neighborhoods.

*Education? impossible to be stronger at it unless you are a teacher, with scores of educators around me, all my life (mother retired with 35 yrs at PS 32) - and in fact, I'd worked as a teacher across my teenage years. No standardized testing for 2nd graders & below. I'm sure we can save millions, if we hired more arbitrators for the UFT/DOE rubber rooms.

*Want a champion for the middle class, to really prevent higher costs & taxes -- and in fact work to lower them (tolls, auto insurance, etc.). Or, would you rather vote for higher costs -- as my opponents favor adding annual street parking fees, to create another fund for the MTA on our backs (atop tolls, phone bills, etc.).

That's not bad.

Oct. 16, 2009, 4:39 am

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Links