Sections
November 20, 2009 / Brooklyn news / 30th Anniversary Special

Along the Gowaus, a sense that past is prologue

for The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

When the city launched its plan to clean up the Gowanus Canal, Brooklynites rejoiced. A flotilla of party barges processed up the two-mile tidal creek-turned-canal passing factories adorned in bunting. The party-goers then marched up to Fourth Avenue. At last, the New York Times reported, south Brooklyn’s “emancipation from the evil smells given forth by murky waters of Gowanus Canal” was at hand.

It was 1911.

Nearly 100 years after the city celebrated the opening of a flushing tunnel to bring cleaner New York Harbor water into the canal, the greenish slick that seems to have served as a catch basin for everything foul — from untreated sewage to heavy metals to slag to PCBs — still stinks.

But now a new odor is wafting over the canal — the smell of money. Real-estate speculators have followed artists into the canal zone looking to trade what little cache there is for condos and housing and even a Whole Foods.

Back in 1911, the mayor opened the flushing tunnel, despite his skepticism about the health affects of the canal’s contaminants.

“I never heard of anyone dying from the smell,” Mayor William Jay Gaynor said at the ceremony.

He was assassinated two years later.

Like Gaynor, Mayor Bloomberg believes that the canal is a key to redeveloping the area. But his clean-up plan is controversial — given that he only unveiled it after the Environmental Protection Agency moved to have the area designated a Superfund site. Such a designation allows the federal government to sue polluters and, eventually, get their money to clean the canal.

The mayor has said that such a plan would stigmatize the area, driving out would-be housing developers. Plus, Bloomberg says his clean-up will be faster.

That said, the city is one of the biggest polluters in the canal zone. Whenever there’s a strong rain, raw sewage — 300 million gallons of it a year, people — spills into the corpse of water. And the canal’s tidal flow makes the water brackish and incapable of supporting life.

The flushing tunnel was supposed to change all that by drawing water from the East River through a 12-foot tunnel along Degraw and Douglass streets.

The propeller that pulls in the water broke in 1960 and then nearly faded into memory before Buddy Scotto, a funeral home proprietor and community activist from Carroll Gardens, lobbied the White House and secured money in the 1970s. The propeller was finally fixed and turned on in 1999.

Two months after the fresh water returned, crabs were seen in the canal for the first time in years.

Other life has been spotted, too. In recent years, the canal has become an artists haven — with even a houseboat.

But the real future of the Gowanus Canal has not been written.

Until the feds or Mike Bloomberg clean up the water, the area will remain the way it has been since the last time city officials said that a clean-up was imminent.

Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Reader Feedback

Joe from Gowanus says:
In addition to the $150M the City has invested, the EPA now intends to sue our City for ancient contamination (when it was legal to pollute)?

Since the City is broke, this means taxpayers will have to pay for the EPA cleanup. How is this fair? We need new leadership to replace our elected officials in Washington and our state who sold out to the EPA!
Nov. 20, 2009, 2:04 pm
JOEY from Gowanus says:
The Clean Water Act was passed in 1972. Dumping so much waste into the canal has been in violation of our federal law for a long time.
Nov. 22, 2009, 3:59 pm
Joe from Gowanus says:
JOEY,

Check out

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/23/business/23sewer.html

The Superfund lawsuit does not address the sewer discharge issue. The Feds are interested in extracting more money from New York - above and beyond fines from non-compliance with clean water act!

New leadership (from NY) in Washington is needed!
Nov. 22, 2009, 9:44 pm
Joanna from Gowanus says:
If the fed's extract money from NYC under Superfund it would be for the purpose of spending it here in Brooklyn--they would not be running off to Washington with that money!

And if it takes the EPA to make NYC spent the money that they should on the Gowanus, then bring in the fed's!

The city has never done right by the Gowanus yet uses the area for more that drainage without properly compensating for those use.
Nov. 22, 2009, 10:12 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.