Berkeley Carroll School gets expansion OK

Community Newspaper Group
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

The city has approved a Park Slope private school’s expansion plan, a controversial scheme that vexes some residents who fear that the new building will undermine the neighborhood’s historic character.

On Tuesday, the Landmarks Preservation Commission voted 8-0 in favor of the Berkeley Carroll School’s one-story annex and rooftop playground at the rear of its campus on Lincoln Place between Seventh and Eighth avenues.

The addition is four feet taller — and occupies a larger footprint — than an existing portion of the school that will be razed.

The project was approved because it “does not involve the removal of historic fabric, and the addition is not visible from a public thoroughfa­re,” said Landmarks spokeswoman Lisi de Bourbon.

She added that the agency is not charged with assessing “quality of life concerns,” but merely the impact of a project on a community’s historic texture.

The school has argued that the new building addresses a pressing need for space, but opponents remain convinced that the playground will add an insufferable wall of sound to their daily lives.

Some residents of St. Johns Place, whose backyards abut the Berkeley Carroll School, vow to fight on.

“The community will not stand by and allow … a project so antagonistic to the neighbors,” said John Muir.

Dan Enriquez, a member of the St. Johns Place Block Association, added that the city approval will allow the “valued historic fabric within our landmark district to be lost forever.”

But Lydia Denworth, the vice president of the school’s board of directors, said that the opponents have taken “a hard line position” that is “overstating” the impact of the addition.

“This is our property and we have a right to build on it,” she said. “Given what we need to do for the school, I think we are building a project that will be as low impact as possible.”

Denworth said a 15-month construction could begin this summer.

Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Reader Feedback

carrie from PLG says:
I don't get it. If you won't be a see this from the street, what about this project is "so antagonistic to the neighbors"? What are the quality of life concerns?
March 12, 2010, 3:28 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.