All Brooklyn news
Neighborhood Map
Bay Ridge
  • Bensonhurst, Dyker Heights
Brooklyn Heights
  • Downtown, DUMBO
Carroll Gardens
  • Cobble Hill, Red Hook, Boerum Hill
Fort Greene
  • Clinton Hill, Crown Heights
North Brooklyn
  • Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Bushwick
Park Slope
  • Prospect Heights, Windsor Terrace, Greenwood Heights
GO Brooklyn
Dining Guide
Where to GO
Events calendar
Classifieds
The Brooklyn Wire
Not Just Nets
Police Blotter
Perspective
Parenting
Politics
Transit
Podcasts
Brooklyn Cyclones
Special sections
About The Paper
Mobile site
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
July 14, 2010 / Perspective / Meadows of Shame

Editorial: Fed geese slaughter was wrong

The Brooklyn Paper

The federal government’s slaughter of more than 250 geese in Prospect Park last week was a horrifying crime that not only calls into question our abilities as stewards of the earth, but also our core values as a species.

We would call the massacre “cruel and inhuman,” but, alas, its cruelty was all too human.

Mankind has long been accustomed to killing the so-called lower species, specifically when said species get in humanity’s way, as the geese did in this case. As urban dwellers, we have certainly participated in — and benefitted from — Man’s domination of the environment. We, too, have flown out of JFK Airport, getting to cruising altitude safely because no goose was sucked into the engines.

But there is a big difference between the unfortunate taking of animal life in order to create essential roads, bridges, subways, safe air corridors and other human “necessities,” and the senseless taking of animal life simply because we lack the will to choose a better way or the talents to find one.

And that’s the essential horror of what transpired in Prospect Park last week.

It’s particularly ironic, given that Prospect Park officials have been under fire for more than a year because of filthy conditions inside the greenspace and a recent spate of unexplained animal deaths. As a PR move, park officials showed off their proud flock to schoolkids — and our photographer — during a class trip last month, touting the lake as a living ecosystem.

All those geese are now dead.

Make no mistake, air passengers should be safe. But we find it simply incomprehensible that birds more than seven miles away from JFK Airport needed to be rounded up under cover of darkness, without so much as a word of public discussion, and gassed simply because other methods of pest control are more inconvenient or require more work on the part of humans.

Worse, the brutality took place inside the city’s greatest park, an urban oasis that was built partly to give city dwellers a place to reconnect, albeit nominally, with nature. Today, Prospect Park is a place where parents take their kids to watch the graceful flight of a swan, a bird alighting on a tree branch, or a turtle peeking out from its shell.

It chills the very soul to think that most of the birds fed by those very kids last week are now buried in an unmarked grave, victims of man’s need to dominate the world — and his clear failure to respect animal life, and himself, in the process.

Reader Feedback

Johny from PS says:
No, it was not wrong, it was needed

You said "it simply incomprehensible that birds more than seven miles away from JFK"

Really? 7 miles is that far for birds? Really?
That's says a lot about your logic on this issue

You said "touting the lake as a living ecosystem"
Well again, no logic on that, those birds have a very limited, none critical role in this ecosystem, trust I have a Phd in Biology.

I understand killing bird does not sound right, but in this case, SAFETY IS FIRST!
July 14, 2010, 1:07 pm
Joseph from Fort Greene says:
An absolute disgrace... Whoever approved and carried this out should be drowned slowly in the Gowanus Canal.
July 14, 2010, 1:11 pm
Jack from Blkyn,Bass Club says:
Unnessary killing !! 3/4 could have been moved 20 miles south to new location problem solved..
then let the public enjoy these brids, phd's still
can make dumb decisions !!
July 14, 2010, 1:26 pm
Moshe Aron Kestenbaum from Williamsburg ODA says:
A misguided policy, Gezze chickens are coming home to roost, "Roast"
July 14, 2010, 1:38 pm
AFLAC says:
We'll be baaaack!
July 14, 2010, 3:01 pm
JJ from Brooklyn says:
PEOPLE OVER GEESE. Gee whiz, your editorial reflects screwed up priorities.
July 14, 2010, 4:27 pm
Kate from Canada says:
There are humane ways to handle the problem. The fact that this was done silently, without public knowledge or debate, is abhorrent. But it's easy and cheap, right? Let's just kill everything that gets in our way.
July 14, 2010, 5:02 pm
Steven Rosenberg from Park Slope says:
You said "touting the lake as a living ecosystem"

No that it matters, but it's an artificial lake fed by tap water. It's probably highly attractive to Geese since most of the nearby water is saltwater.
July 14, 2010, 5:28 pm
Steven Rosenberg from Park Slope says:
Uh....just how was this not a "humane way to handle the problem"?
July 14, 2010, 5:29 pm
xlamp from West Village says:
Why is not more said about the need to reduce the amount of air travel? For the sake of the environment, we should be reducing the amount of energy we use and that means fewer flights.

My question is who says who decides when birds are killed? And why can't we design systems to detect flocks around airports and adjust take offs and landings so that the birds don't need to be murdered. We are truly the most selfish and cruelest of species.
July 14, 2010, 6:26 pm
al pankin from downtown says:
they should have been dealt with long ago, good riddence. most of these comments are nonsense, and so is this article.
July 14, 2010, 6:32 pm
kelly from park slope says:
Macabre but practical twist: could they not have been used for food for the homeless?

Maybe Dickensian, but 250 roast geese could feed a lot of people. They are large birds!

Most disturbing part of this story is that there was no notice. Hence no planning.
July 14, 2010, 8:39 pm
jay from pslope says:
I totally disagree with this editorial. First these birds were making bird crap all over the place, guess what, that IS a health hazard, both to humans AND the "eco-system".
Second, an area can only support so much of one species, and these geese are all over the place.
Third, the flight path to Laguarda is DIRECTLY over prospect park, these birds are ALWAYS a threat to slow and low flying aircraft coming in to land, which is when an aircraft is most vulnerable.
Do you want another plane to crash in Park Slope, because of a stupid goose? (There was a plane crash in 1960 in park slope, you can see video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjYyBCuysG0 )
July 14, 2010, 8:54 pm
jonathan from Kensington says:
Regardless of how anyone feels about this--horrified (like so many of us) or ambivalent (because of a so-called nuisance)--most people are deeply misinformed. The fact remains, the birds that struck that plane were *migratory, not local*. What exactly is exterminating a local population in their native habitat going to do? If the Agricultural department would have put an extra step in their crazy logic, they would begin the gassing waaaay further north.
Just keep in mind, the USAIR flight climbing out of La Guardia was at 2200 feet altitude when it flew through the flock of migrating canada geese, not local geese that are being killed. Local geese don't go above 100 feet flying from where they sleep to where they feed.
July 15, 2010, 4:14 am
Phil from Flatbush says:
I didn't particularly care for the geese being there but I didn't think that euthanizing them would be the solution. I thought there might be more humane ways of dealing with the geese. Don't be surprised when you see another migration pf geese next year roosting in Prospect Park. And don't be surprised when it's handled in the same way. There must be a way to attract the geese to a particular spot in the park where they won't be considered troublesome to the people who like to keep their shoes clean.
July 15, 2010, 9:41 am
Jamie from Flatbush says:
I assume the Brooklyn Paper editorial board is equally opposed to the Transit Authority's efforts to reduce the rat population in subway stations.

If not, why the inconsistency?
July 15, 2010, 10:50 am
Deb from South Slope says:
As Jonathan says, there are two issues here. The first is public safety, and these particular geese were not a threat to airplanes. They stayed in the Park year-round - they were being fed and had no incentive to leave, and it's not like geese take day trips to visit some friends who live out by the airport. In or near the park, they obviously cannot fly high enough to get anywhere near a jet on its approach, the jets may be landing but are still too high at that point.

These particular geese did not need to be destroyed for public safety. If they actually did pose a threat, like geese living closer to the airport, I'd feel differently.

The second issue is that because the park conditions are so good that the geese never want to leave, the geese had severely overpopulated the park and were crowding out the other waterfowl species. There were many more ducks in the park 5 or more years ago, and not the mobs of geese that have been here in more recent years (a post to a previous article noted this as well). That was a problem that definitely needed to be addressed, but not like this. A partial culling and a concerted effort to keep goose eggs from hatching (there are several low-cost methods to do this) would have been much more humane.
July 15, 2010, 2:42 pm
Matt from westchester says:
If I could have, I would have removed these geese myself. People come first, then a bunch of other things in the middle, and wayyyyyyyy down the totem pole of humanity are Canadian Geese that can potentially kill humans flying on planes. Enough is enough with crying for these geese. They reproduce like it is their job (which it sort of is) and rest assured they will crap all over the earth for many years to come. Killing a miniscule percentage of geese to save human lives is the best option. No matter how they are disposed of.
July 15, 2010, 4:16 pm
Matt from westchester says:
One more thing. To the individual that proposed decreasing flights, as well as radar around airports to detect geese so that we can adjust our flight patterns (which is what you were getting at), you must be kidding. We should change the plans of human beings so that geese can fly freely? WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THIS WORLD.
July 15, 2010, 4:23 pm
Johanna from Park Slope says:
Residents, Park-goers, Wildlife Advocates are holding a Vigil for the Prospect Park Geese, Saturday, July 17th, 6:30 p.m. near the Prospect Park Lake, Southwest side of the park, enter at Vanderbilt Street or the Park Circle. F train to Fort Hamilton Parkway stop - exit towards Prospect Avenue/Reeve Place. Everyone is invited.

bottom photo: Jennifer Dudley
Part I: The Killing of the Prospect Park Geese, Part I

For more information please see:

Posted at Washington Square Park Blog: http://washingtonsquarepark.wordpress.com/2010/07/16/why-did-new-york-city-approve-a-massacre-of-400-geese-in-prospect-park/

http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=124539710923736
July 17, 2010, 12:50 pm
Amy from Park Slope says:
Thank you, I agree with this editorial, and comments by Jonathan and Deb above. The NYC Audubon, our local experts on birds, points out that destroying an entire local population should be a last resort. They offer other suggestions for controlling populations, and where readers who agree can call to voice their opinion so that this policy can be changed:

http://www.nycaudubon.org/home/home/goose2010.shtml

This should not be people vs. the birds. We are a part of this environment, and as the top of the food chain, as some here suggest, we've got a responsibility to make sound decisions based on science, not our personal perceptions or opinions about goose poop.
July 17, 2010, 2:43 pm
unknown. from Bergen Co says:
Whoever made this decision is obviously an idiot and will eventually go to hell.
I'm so sick of people who makes these radical decisions to just kill animals but then we teach children growing up not to abuse them. Have people lost their minds? It's not our choice when to take someone's or something's life.. I can't wait till they get theres.
Aug. 23, 2010, 3:42 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Links