Sections

Work of schlock? Reality TV artist raises questions — about the Brooklyn Museum

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

An exhibit in the Brooklyn Museum showcasing the winner of a reality TV show is now open to the public — and contrary to many fears, the walls of the borough’s most-prestigious institution have not crumbled, though they have weakened.

“Work of Art: Abdi Farah,” while inconsistent over all, isn’t all that bad considering the artist’s rapid rise into the public eye. Given how quickly Farah will likely vanish from the public attention granted him by the Bravo TV series, he at least deserves a moment for that same public to consider his work on its own merits — before turning to the larger superficial issues raised by the existence of this show in the first place.

The most striking and provocative piece in the exhibit is “Libation,” which features two sculptures of figures wearing gym shorts and Nike high-tops splayed out on the floor. The bodies conjure memories of people shot for their Air Jordans and the fetishization of brands in urban America.

But in a larger sense, “Libation” — especially given the setting — can be interpreted as a commentary on the many issues of commercialization surrounding the “Work of Art” series.

Unfortunately, the two sculptures are the strongest indication of Farah’s potential as an artist, while the rest of the material doesn’t yield much more than a shrug of the shoulders.

Taken as a whole, the exhibit evokes a visit to the morgue; there are so many supine figures and body bags that a museum goer might not think she’s checking out an exhibit related to “Work of Art,” but rather an artistic interpretation of “The Wire” or “Dexter.”

All 11 pieces tackle urban life — something not at all out of place in the Brooklyn Museum — but some fail in fully communicating a message. “Tuskegee” — a painting of two bodies radiating red — is connected only in title to the mid-century racist syphilis research done in the name of science.

But as interesting it as to see Farah’s development as an artist during what must have been an extraordinarily intense (and micromanaged) series of months while filming the TV show, what the exhibit means for the Brooklyn Museum is just as compelling a topic.

In an introduction by Charles Desmarais, the museum’s deputy director of art, the institution openly wrestles with the decision to participate in “Work of Art,” and attempts to justify it.

“ ‘Work of Art’ is a direct descendent of the juried-exhibition tradition [of 19th-century France],” Desmarais writes.

Perhaps, but if reality TV is a descendant, it is a grotesque and disfigured one — more an inbred relative than the inheritor of centuries of artistic criticism.

Desmarais conveys the reservations the Brooklyn Museum likely felt when considering this endeavor, describing it as an “experiment in serving the museum’s audience in new ways.”

“Reality television … offers a dynamic new way for viewers to encounter a work of art,” he says.

It remains to be seen how many people will actually show up to physically encounter Farah’s small exhibit — it is quite possible that people prefer making superficial judgments from their couch rather than engaging with an amateur artist having his first taste of celebrity.

But even if visitors do flock to the Brooklyn Museum, many will likely be left with a sour taste in their mouths.

Farah is not primarily to blame for the feeling of emptiness that accompanies reality TV’s successful invasion of the Brooklyn Museum. Countless artists have teetered on the edge of commercialism — heck, the Andy Warhol exhibit is right down the hall, in the same space where the Takashi Murakami show was last year.

But Farah lacks the key ingredient for those two giants of commercial art: irony.

In fact, the arrival of “Work of Art” is deadly serious; it raises questions about where the Brooklyn Museum is headed now that it has decided to embrace reality television — a form of entertainment almost completely devoid of artistry.

“Work of Art: Abdi Farah” at the Brooklyn Museum [200 Eastern Pkwy. at Washington Avenue in Prospect Heights, (718) 638-5000], now through Oct. 17. Closed Mondays and Tuesdays.

Updated 3:19 pm, August 16, 2010: Includes correct spelling of a sexually transmitted disease, which, clearly, people of our hygiene would have no familiarity with.
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Reader Feedback

Mary from Sunset Park says:
I no longer go to the Brooklyn Museum
because I do not like what has happened
& continues to happen regarding the exhibits presented to the public.
Some of the "art" being presented to the public is crap. I've seen it, it's crap!

Many years ago I was able to see the tapestries that Dorothy Eady & an Egyptian lady (her name escapes me) enbroidered. They were a time line history of Egypt. They were stored in the Library. They were breath taking. I was told they could not be displayed because it would be hard to place them. They were'nt ancient nor artifacts etc. They should be shown!
This can't be exhibited, obnoxious stuff can. I made my chouce, I no longer go to a Museum I loved.

Further, with the elimination of the Union Street bus, it becomes a burden.
Aug. 15, 2010, 10:35 am
J jackson from California says:
Please google the Tuskegee experiment. It has nothing too do with the Tuskegee Airmen.
Aug. 16, 2010, 1:42 pm
Bill from Brooklyn says:
Yes, do some research before you criticize with ignorance.
Aug. 16, 2010, 1:54 pm
Bill from Brooklyn says:
Thanks for the rewrite. It's too bad that the art didn't communicate with you. Maybe next time he'll put a sign on the bodies that says Syphilis. And better get some spell-check software too. It has one L.
Aug. 16, 2010, 2:50 pm
daisy from park slope says:
http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/jerk-of-art/

please read this.
Aug. 31, 2010, 1:51 pm
Anastasia from Bensonhurst says:
Just a heads up that the writer used to wrong pronoun in the caption.

Caption two says: "Abdi Farah, the winner of Bravo TV’s “Work Of Art: The Next Great Artist,” will show off HER work at the Brooklyn Museum..."

Abdi Farah is a man, so it should be 'his.'
Oct. 2, 2010, 5:06 pm
Anastasia from Bensonhurst says:
*the
Oct. 2, 2010, 10:23 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.