Today’s news:

Liberals target Target for company’s right-wing ties

for The Brooklyn Paper

The national fight over how political campaigns are financed came to Fort Greene on Tuesday as community activists rallied at the Atlantic Terminal Target to protest the retail company’s $150,000 donation to an anti-gay rights gubernatorial candidate in Minnesota.

It was one of 100 rallies around the country that calling for the end of unrestricted corporate spending on elections, which was made legal in a January Supreme Court ruling.

“I think Target will listen to large numbers of people across the country who are against companies funding political candidates,” said Shawn Marie Walsh, a Bed-Stuy resident who helped organize the rally.

Public Advocate Bill DeBlasio and Councilwoman Letitia James (D–Fort Greene) encouraged the participants in the protest, which was on Flatbush Avenue, to phone Target’s headquarters and demand that the company stop dishing out dough to political candidates.

Target, the second-largest discount retailer in the country, has underwritten ads for Rep. Tom Emmer, a Republican who opposes gay marriage. Many of the protesters — good Brooklyn liberals, all! — said support for a possible homophobe who is also “pro-gun, pro-life and pro-Arizona immigration law” in the words of one person at the rally makes them reluctant to support Target (even with its great back-to-school prices).

Target’s treasury is financing a candidate who is everything New Yorkers are not,” DeBlasio said.

But DeBlasio also complained of the larger issue — how corporations can now legally make contributions into the political system thanks to the supreme court ruling.

“I am sure many New Yorkers and consumers will join me in demanding that Target pledge to not spend another dime in our elections.”

Pin It
Print this story Permalink

Reader Feedback

Joe Z. from Greenpoint says:
How is what George Soros, or any other liberal group which donates money to Democratic candidates who promote left-wing ideology, any different than what Target did? Is it because Target's candidates don't subscribe to the Left's particular agendas?

"“I think Target will listen to large numbers of people across the country who are against companies funding political candidates,” said Shawn Marie Walsh, a Bed-Stuy resident who helped organize the rally."

That only applies to companies backing right-wing politcal candidates. Lefties would be exempt because they're so much more ideologically superior, right? The only thing the left is superior in, when compared to the right wing, is in hypocrisy.

Enough of the "gay rights" nonsense. Gays aren't a racial/ethnic group. Being gay isn't some culture, in the real sense of the word. It's nothing more than a lifestyle. The whole premise in using this euphemism is to validate their personal sexual practices. Don't even attempt to use the "homophobe" card. I don't have to agree with you; or you with my opinions. I have the right not to condone that particular practice. Just like a lot of other people.

If you're so dead against Target's campaign contributions to the candidates of their choice, start in your house first. The left holds no monopoly on moral values. Actually, they have none.
Aug. 18, 2010, 12:37 pm
Rico from Crown Heights says:
Sorry, Joe, your weak argument that gay rights are "nonsense" does nothing but illustrate your bigotry. Like the rest of your points, it doesn't hold water.
Sept. 2, 2010, 12:48 pm
Joe Z. from Greenpoint says:
Your response is pitiful. Sexual preference is a private choice. Nobody can be forced to accept what he/she considers offensive or distaseful. You resort to the typical liberal catch-all, "bigotry", so you won't be required to make a valid counterpoint. The reason for this is that you have nothing valid with which to refute my comments.

If you think my comments regarding corporate campaign contributions are wrong, you expose yourself as nothing more than a left-wing liberal hypocrite who believes in the freedom of speech, as long as what is said corresponds with your ideological agenda.
Sept. 2, 2010, 11:09 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.