Today’s news:

Fight for real mass transit

The Brooklyn Paper

Earlier this year, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority deeply reduced transit service, including eliminating several useful bus routes across Brooklyn. The agency’s reaction was, basically, “Tough luck, commuters.”

To its credit, the city tried to find a way to bridge the chasm between poor MTA service and New Yorkers’ sometimes unreasonable expectations. The plan called for van operators to service the killed bus lines, making continuous loops and charging $2 per ride — a privately run shuttle service, if you will.

Our initial coverage of this proposal exposed its inherent flaws: van operators are not required to stay on the routes, are not required to pay their drivers respectable wages, are not required to provide any base level of service and, indeed, not even required to keep a set schedule.

As a result of these predictable deficiencies, van operator Sulaiman Haqq, whose Brooklyn Van Lines “won” the right to service the former B71 route between Columbia Street and Crown Heights, now says he’s “bleeding money” on the pilot program — and is calling for a city mass-transit subsidy to keep his business afloat.

It’s hard not to be sympathetic to hard-working guys like Haqq, who wants to do what capitalists have done for generations: provide a service and make a profit from it.

But Haqq quickly discovered what we have been saying all along: mass transit is not capitalism.

For any public transportation system to work, it needs to be subsidized properly. And this is where government has consistently failed us.

Whatever the MTA’s flaws, its inability to provide sufficient transit service is mostly a function of gutless Albany legislators with skewed or parochial priorities that siphon away mass-transit funding into pet projects or upstate boondoggles.

New York City transit riders pay a much higher portion of the operating expenses of their public transportation system than do riders elsewhere — and it’s because our lawmakers lack the courage to fight for transit funding formulas.

But rather than bail out guys like Sulaiman Haqq — who, frankly, is in over his head — taxpayers need to demand that legislators make mass transit a bona fide priority, not a hollow campaign talking point.

We live in a day when the airwaves are filled with anti-government bile that suggests that less government is the answer to all our problems.

But we believe otherwise; government-provided services — parks, roads, schools, libraries — enrich our lives every day.

The challenge is for voters to demand more services, not less — and for lawmakers to do their job and provide them rather than hide under a right-wing rhetorical rock.

Pin It
Print this story Permalink

Reader Feedback

Cap'n Transit from Queens says:
Let him run the vans through the tunnel to Manhattan, and see how many passengers he gets that way!

http://capntransit.blogspot.com/2010/08/setting-livery-vans-up-for-failure.html
Oct. 14, 2010, 11:09 am
David from Waterfront says:
I miss the 71- and how was I supposed to know about the replacement van service? A little publicity would help. One negative- the transfer to other buses.
Oct. 15, 2010, 9:32 am
Bob Scott from Brooklyn says:
1. Q: How many Brownstone Brooklynites would ever ride a transit van at any price? A: Never enough to justify a subsidy. (It's not clear why The Brooklyn Paper keeps covering this story, which has no relevance to its readers.)

2. It is true that NYC mass transit is underfunded. But it is ALSO true that it poorly manages the funds it receives. When the political hacks who run the MTA shape up or ship out, when the MTA board stops giving away HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS to developers like Bruce Ratner and also starts holding its contractors accountable for their work and for the timely fulfillment of their contracts' obligations at the price agreed upon, and when the MTA finally insists that its employees actually WORK for a living … THEN we can talk about giving the MTA more cash.
Oct. 15, 2010, 11:30 am

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Links