Sections

Pols: Let’s talk about sex (not!)

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Borough Republicans are just saying “no” to Mayor Bloomberg’s sex-ed initiative, demanding that the city offer parents the ability to opt out in favor of abstinence-only education.

The coalition of conservative lawmakers says that parents — who can opt-out of portions of the program — should be able to decide what their children are taught about sex.

“We’re not saying that they shouldn’t teach sex-ed in schools — just that [parents] should have an option,” said Greg Pfundstein of the NYC Parents Choice Coalition.

The city announced over the summer that, starting in January, students would be required to take a semester-long sex-ed class in junior high and again in high school.

The mayor’s plan is part of an effort to squelch teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. The lessons would cover anatomy, puberty, the appropriate age for sex, how to use condoms, and other topics.

Studies have linked abstinence-only programs to a rise in teen pregnancy — particularly in sex-ed–free Texas, where the birth rate among 15- to 19-year-olds is third highest in the nation.

But opponents of the program — which allows students to opt-out of classes that cover the use of birth control — say that the city is overstepping its bounds by forcing kids to take sex-ed classes.

Rep. Bob Turner (R–Marine Park) and Rep. Michael Grimm (R–Bay Ridge) added that any curriculum should be sensitive towards students of different religious faiths — some of which do not allow frank discussions of sexuality.

State law already allows parents to opt-out of sex-ed classes due to religious or moral reasons. And city officials said that they have a responsibility to teach sex-ed.

“Abstinence is a very important part of the curriculum, but we also have a responsibility to ensure that teenagers who are choosing to have sex understand the potential consequences of their actions and know how to keep themselves safe,” said schools Chancellor Dennis Walcott.

“One-third of the new cases of chlamydia in the city are in teenagers and a significant percentage of our teenagers have had multiple sexual partners, so we can’t stick our heads in the sand about this.”

Reach reporter Dan MacLeod at dmacleod@cnglocal.com or by calling (718) 260-4507.

Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Reader Feedback

Bay Ridger from Bay Ridge says:
Grimm doesn't have enough to do in Washington to be involved with NYC schools? Or do his big-money contributors require him to spread his right-wing conservative agenda wherever the opportunity arises.

Grimm is a puppet of the 1%.
Oct. 26, 2011, 11:44 am
Mike from Williamsburg says:
Children should be removed from homes headed by parents who seek to keep them ignorant.
Oct. 26, 2011, 1:24 pm
Joey Bots says:
Hey Mike from Williamsburg - Never let it be said that Liberals are not facists! Good going!
Oct. 26, 2011, 5:03 pm
Tal Barzilai from Pleasantville, NY says:
The first amendment of the US Constitution seperates religious teachings from public schools. If any students want to learn about abstinence, they can always go to their church. This fanaticism only shows that we should be taxing religious institutions especially if they choose to be political. I never did see what was wrong with sex ed, but conservatives tend to have issues with anything that they don't like. Seriously, I find it an irony when they claim liberals should never force anything on them, but always think that they have the right to force what they want on others no matter what.
Oct. 27, 2011, 7:54 pm
Tal Barzilai from Pleasantville, NY says:
That couldn't have been me that posted on oct 27 b/c I was too busy having sex with Jennifer Lopez at Ratner's beachfront mansion on Long Island.
Jan. 17, 2012, 5:09 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.