Today’s news:

A toxic sludge pile in Red Hook is off the table in the final ‘Superfund’ plan, though — that they’ll save for people upstate or in Jersey

Tank you very much! Feds’ final Gowanus Canal clean-up plan calls for giant sewage containers over city’s objections

The Brooklyn Paper

It’s signed, sealed, and delivered!

Federal bigwigs finalized a controversial plan to dredge and clean the fetid Gowanus Canal on Monday, making it the law of the land despite the Bloomberg administration’s opposition to a major part of the half-billion-dollar Superfund clean-up.

Under the federal plan, the Environmental Protection Agency will force the city to pay to stop millions of gallons of raw sewage from polluting the waterway by building massive, $78-million underground holding tanks, even though the city claims the project is completely unnecessary because poop is the least of the canal’s problems. The plan’s authors make it clear that they think the city’s pleas are hogwash.

“The tanks are essential,” said environmental agency regional administrator Judith Enck, who stood with officials alongside the banks of the waterway to make the announcement on Monday. “We included this in the [final plan] because it doesn’t make sense to dredge the contaminated sediment and then have recontamination.”

The two gigantic tanks — one holding as much as eight-million gallons and the other holding as much as four — are to be buried alongside the canal to catch the storm water and untreated toilet slop that spews into the waterway during heavy rains.

Combatting sewage overflow was not the initial focus of the Superfund plan. The feds originally targeted the crud at the bottom of the canal for dredging because it was known to be loaded with dozens of dangerous contaminants, including heavy metals such as mercury, lead, copper, and other chemicals. But when investigators found gasoline, diesel, and coal tar residues in the water, they added the tanks to the initial plan, which already called for digging up 10 feet of the canal-bed muck and covering it with sand, clay, and gravel to keep the remaining poisons in.

The finalized Superfund plan is a formal decree by the federal government, but officials with the city who oppose paying for the tanks say they still see room for the feds to change their minds.

“It is our hope that the [Environmental Protection Agency] will ultimately conclude that building two large tanks is unnecessary to remediate the canal, and not in the best interests of New Yorkers, who will foot the bill,” said Department of Environmental Protection Commissioner Carter Strickland, responding to Monday’s announcement.

The city department responded to the December 2012 proposal of the tanks by saying that it has a $200-million grab bag of clean-up projects on tap that will clean the water enough that it will not need the tanks to end the scourge of the brown tide.

The response of federal officials has always been a firm no and, though they say that sewage is not the primary form of pollution on the foul canal, they concluded that it is damaging enough to un-do their clean-up and said that the city’s measures are tissues on a situation that calls for a diaper.

The only aspect of the plan that is now up for discussion, the federal agency says, is the placement of both tanks.

The feds are still considering burying one of the tanks beneath Gowanus’s Thomas Green Playground and Douglass-Degraw Pool, which sparked outcry among neighbors. Superfund project manager Christos Tsiamis said that if the tank is placed underneath the park, the feds will work with the city to provide an alternative for those left without a place to play during the years-long construction.

The finalized clean-up plan, which was overwhelmingly cheered by locals, activists, and elected officials on Monday, is the result of years of community input and more than 1,800 formal comments that neighbors submitted after the federal agency released a final draft in December 2012.

In the final plan, the federal agency nixed its initial plan of storing de-contaminated sludge dredged from the Gowanus Canal on the Red Hook waterfront — a proposal that some Red Hookers vigorously opposed.

“We’re most appreciative of the fact that the Environmental Protection Agency listened to the community,” said John McGettrick, co-chair of the Red Hook Civic Association. “This is a win for the entire community.”

Along with the city, which the federal agency singles out as one of the biggest polluters of the canal, the feds have tapped three-dozen polluters and owners of historically polluting sites to foot the bill for the clean-up, including energy giant National Grid, Con Edison, and Verizon.

The $506-million clean-up, which is expected to start in either 2016 or 2017 after a design phase is completed, will address the worst contamination of the man-made waterway that comes from its 150-year history as a major industrial transportation route for manufactured gas plants, paper mills, tanneries, and other chemical plants that operated along its banks, according to agency officials. In their rosiest projection of the clean-up, officials say that water will still only be three-quarters of the way purified, meaning that Brooklynites still will not be able to swim or eat fish out of the water-way any time in the foreseeable future.

The state’s Department of Environmental Conservation will oversee the clean-up of polluted plots of land where three gas plants once stood along the canal, using money from National Grid.

Agency officials say that once the clean-up starts, it will take between eight and 10 years to complete.

The Superfund clean-up plan also calls for:

• Blocking any illegal pipes running into the sewer system around the canal.

• Treating the foul gunk scraped from the canal-bed and disposing of it off-site at either a facility upstate or in New Jersey, where it will be burned and possibly reused for a landfill cover.

• Removing any contaminated material from the canal’s First Street basin and restoring approximately 475 feet of the former basin.

• Excavating and restoring the waterway’s Fifth Street basin.

• Other efforts to keep sewage out of the canal including water-retaining green spaces, funded by federal and city grants.

Neighbors and activists who have agitated for years for a thorough scrubbing said that they could not be happier that a plan has finally been set in motion.

“There is no turning back now,” said Linda Mariano, cofounder of Friends and Residents of the Greater Gowanus, who has devoted herself to the clean-up effort for decades. “It’s an exciting moment. The future of the Gowanus Canal is hopeful.”

Federal officials said that they will hold two informational meetings about the clean-up in Gowanus and Red Hook sometime in October.

Reach reporter Natalie Musumeci at nmusumeci@cnglocal.com or by calling (718) 260-4505. Follow her at twitter.com/souleddout.

Pin It
Print this story Permalink

Reader Feedback

edwin almeyda from red hook says:
to whom this may concern, why we ask why over and over again at these meeting how and what will benefit from this clean up...people that walk that over that water everyday won't that for sure and like these meeting, the people who lobbied for this project should of had some kind of training for this type of job,and if go down to the gowanus canel like i did today you won't not one resident from the community benefiting from this job because that is what it is NOW.. A REAL BIG NASTY JOB... that can change a person life this why community board#6 is really out of touch with it's residents they approve big projects to be done like the barclay's center now the gowanus canel and don't put people from the area to work ...please yall meaning who every is the community leisure's,please we ask please stop taking our jobs away from us please...
Oct. 1, 2013, 9:38 am
Rich from Park Slope says:
Edwin, I'm not sure what you're talking about. How is this at all related to taking away jobs from your neighborhood? This is a project that you should be excited about. Waste sites such as the canal are detrimental to everyone and should be cleaned. It's also being funded by companies who contributed to the toxic environment and by the federal government by being declared a Superfund site.

EPA is also correct in forcing the city to pay for the tanks. Why bother cleaning up if you end up dumping large volumes of sewer during a heavy downpour?

Cleaning up the canal is a huge endeavor that requires experienced personnel. I look forward to walking by a clean Gowanus Canal in 10 years.
Oct. 1, 2013, 9:49 am
o3 from bk says:
the EPA is forcing other cities w combined sewer & storm systems to build retention tanks which hold any overflow until it can be processed by treatment plants.
Oct. 1, 2013, 11:23 am
John Wasserman from Windsor Terrace says:
If you don't mind my saying so, I think we all need to settle down for just a moment here. Now, you may not like what I'm about to say about this, but I'm sure if you take the time and imagine a world of absolute silence, you may be able to see my side of this story. I strictly have to go with the Feds on this one. There, I said it. Here's hoping that 1) You'll have a nice day and 2) You will pardon the voicing of my opinion.
Oct. 1, 2013, 12:11 pm
Tal Barzilai from Pleasantville, NY says:
“It is our hope that the [Environmental Protection Agency] will ultimately conclude that building two large tanks is unnecessary to remediate the canal, and not in the best interests of New Yorkers, who will foot the bill,” said Department of Environmental Protection Commissioner Carter Strickland, responding to Monday’s announcement"

I couldn't have said this better myself. I could have actually but some people here would take it personaly and attack me on the internet. I'm not going to name any names you know who you are.
Oct. 1, 2013, 3:34 pm
ty from pps says:
You are still an idiot. (You were probably referring to me, right?)
Oct. 1, 2013, 4:53 pm
Tal Barzilai from Pleasantville, NY says:
Yes Ty and what a surprise: another personal insult. Honestly is this really how some people get their jollies? And while I'm here I might as well say that Rich from P.S., this has EVERYTHING to do with neighborhood jobs. The tanks are an almost COMPLETE waste of money considering that they only last for 2 years tops. I'm sure a lot of you didn't even know that. John wasserman you have no idea what you are talking about-you are probably the kind of person that doesn't like to ask questions to the President and other leaders.
Oct. 1, 2013, 5:18 pm
SwampYankee from runined Brooklyn says:
Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Let's just clean this up. It will take decades. This is an acceptable first step. If we could all stop going to court for every single step of the process maybe, just maybe, measurable progress could be made. This was a mess centuries in the making, it won't clean up fast but lets move on this while the dollars are there. This is not about us and being able to clean this up in a year or two. It's time for some generational ethics and we do something we can pass along
Oct. 1, 2013, 7:03 pm
jay from nyc says:
I am glad this is happening. That entire area is just stuck because of the canal, it would be nice to see life come back to it.
Tal where and what is your source for the tanks only lasting two years, or is this another one of your made up BDS type lies? Oh, and Tal, you started calling people names first, so get over yourself.
Oct. 1, 2013, 11:24 pm
gloria from gowanus says:
the article said the cleanup would:
• Excavating and restoring the waterway’s Fifth Street basin.

Is this true? That is amazing news if that is also in the EPA plan!
Oct. 2, 2013, 9:56 pm
Gow's Anus from unpleasantcavity, NY says:
tal, when does the —— flowing out of your mouth ever stop?
Oct. 3, 2013, 12:56 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Links