Who guards the guards?

for The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Whether private, Orthodox Jewish “Shomrim” (“guards” in Hebrew) may serve any useful function is not the question. Let us assume they do. The question – which ought to answer itself – is whether New York City taxpayers should be helping to fund organizations that 1) encroach on the purview of official law enforcement agencies, 2) favor the interests of one specific community, and 3) may well suppress criminal complaints for ostensibly religious reasons.

The discrimination inherent in public funding of Shomrim is a matter of fact, not opinion. Jewish groups in New York are getting far more money through City Council than those affiliated with any other religion, even though Jews make up only about 22 percent of the city’s population. (Catholics, by contrast, make up more than 60 percent.) Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer has said that “favoritism” is “endemic” in such a system. Clearly it is.

What’s more, the mission of groups like Shomrim is itself discriminatory. The police force is far from perfect, but unlike Shomrim patrols it is charged with protecting the entire city, not just a privileged slice of its population. And that’s precisely why everyone in the city may justly be expected to fund the NYPD. The same cannot be said for private vigilantes who, in the best of circumstances, represent only Orthodox Jewish communities. And that tells only part of the story: two years ago, the Jewish Week reported that an influential Orthodox rabbi (who still advises the state-funded, Orthodox-run Ohel Children’s Home) taught publicly that Jews may steal from non-Jews “as long as one doesn’t get caught, according to people in attendance.” I wouldn’t want my tax dollars to support private “law enforcement” that may be guided by such a view; are non-Jews likely to feel differently?

Apart from favoritism, religion-based pseudo-police are flawed from the start by their inevitable application of a specialized religious agenda to matters of public policy. Many of the rabbis and lay leaders who dominate Shomrim groups do not believe Jewish criminals should be prosecuted by non-Jews. In 2000, after a Hasidic family went to police over alleged abuse of their young son by another Orthodox Jew, some 50 rabbis signed a public announcement in a Yiddish-language Brooklyn newspaper authorizing the murder of anyone who “informs” on a fellow Jew to secular authorities.

I wouldn’t try to dictate anyone else’s religious beliefs. But taxpayers have the right to demand that their money isn’t used to promote insular religious principles that violate basic law enforcement policy.

Michael Lesher is a writer, lawyer and Orthodox Jew. He is a contributor to “Tempest in the Temple: Jewish Communities and Child Sex Scandals.”

Updated 5:25 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

Chris from Bay Ridge Brooklyn says:
Lesher I'm sorry to say but your writing who's sole purpose is to incite hatred against orthodox Jews is as ugly as your face! Plus many of your facts are outright blatant lies! Like for instance that a Rabbi said its allowed to steal from non jews. Basically you're as ugly on the inside as you are on the outside. Cheers.
Aug. 12, 2011, 1:08 pm
da editah says:
A blatant lie that cites its source?
Aug. 12, 2011, 3 pm
Chris from Bay Ridge Brooklyn says:
@ da editah: I wouldn't call the The Jewish Week a source, to call it "self hating" will be an understatement!
What the author seems to be ignoring is the fact that the Shomrim work WITH the nypd! When they apprehend a suspect FROM ANY RACE they hold him/her until the POLICE comes. And why shouldn't other communities have their own street patrol like The Guardian Angels' for example whom btw was lead by a great Catholic by the name of Curtis Sliwa. Intentions of this author are without a shred of a doubt melicious.
Aug. 12, 2011, 4:54 pm
Herschel from Kensington says:

Government gives grants explicitly to faith-based organizations exactly because the government recognizes that such focused (i.e. catering to only a specific group) is required in a mixed society. Thus the federal government sees nothing wrong with granting tax money to an organization authorized with catering to one specific (faith-based) sector of society. Just because that article posted here uses such words as "privileged sector" does not make it so. It makes it opinion, not fact.
Aug. 14, 2011, 2:44 pm
Herschel from Kensington says:
How much City, State and Federal money has gone to Sharpton's National Action Network over the years, and how much extortion and criminality has eminated from the NAN?

You could add up all the money that's gone to Shomrim, Hatzoloh and other Jewish organizations, and it still wouldn't be a fraction of the NAN's take from the taxpayer.

Here's just a little taste:
Aug. 14, 2011, 4:46 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: