Council delays ‘bridge blocker’vote
A City Council vote on a plan to build a high-rise apartment building
on Water Street in DUMBO that could potentially block views of and from
the Brooklyn Bridge was held over this week while the developers —
the father-and-son team of David and Jed Walentas — amend their proposal,
council sources said.
“There are still discussions going on between all parties, and we
are laying the vote over as long as possible to give as much time as possible
to discussions,” said Councilman Tony Avella, who chairs the Zoning
and Franchises subcommittee. “I can’t remember in the two-and-a-half
years I’ve been chair that we’ve delayed a vote to this extent.”
While he said the Walentases submitted a second amended version of their
plan the vote has been held off so all the members can first become familiar
with the latest changes.
“Based on [the changes] I’ve seen,” which Avella said were
not much different, “I’m still opposed to the project.”
Councilman David Yassky, in whose district the project site lies, said
through a spokesman that the latest revisions were still unacceptable.
“I think to us they’re very much superficial changes,”
said Yassky spokesman Evan Thies. “From what I understand the change
would be moving the building a little bit further back from the bridge
and taking that additional bulk and adding it to the height of the building.
That is not acceptable to the community, and it’s not acceptable
Thies said Yassky has been lobbying members of the Land Use committee
to vote against the project if it makes it out of the subcommittee.
But some community groups are afraid the delay in voting is indicative
of something more.
“The fact that something this important involving the Brooklyn Bridge
is being conducted in the corridors,” Stanton said, “they’re
just big wizards over there in the speaker’s office, controlling
Several calls to Two Trees Management, the development company of the
Walentases, were not returned.
Stanton said the delay in voting on the plan is less about the new designs,
and more about power wielding.
“Nobody’s taking that seriously, really. I don’t know anybody
who’s taking that seriously,” she said of the designs.
Avella echoed her sentiment.
“It was unclear to me what it meant, but basically they were taking
a corner off the building,” Avella said of the latest modifications.
“The corner closest to the bridge, or further from the bridge,”
he said, adding that it was hard to understand because “they didn’t
have time to do complete architectural drawings.”
The plan, which promises to build an estimated 200 apartments and comes
with a commitment by Jed Walentas that should Two Trees’ application
for an 80-20 tax abatement be accepted, they’d provide 20 percent
of the units for low-income residents. Below that would sit 8,000 square
feet of retail space.
The building would stand 178-feet tall, according to the last plans submitted
by the group.
The amended plan moved the tallest point of the building 134 feet away
from the bridge roadway, instead of the originally planned 70 feet.
Yassky, who was at first suspected to be a supporter of the plan, because
he took a few months to state his opinion on the proposal, said he recognized
the need for such housing, but not at that detriment to Brooklyn’s
“There needs to be housing in the community and it’s the kind
of thing that needs to be built, but in a way where we can preserve the
character of the community and prosperity of the Brooklyn Bridge,”
©2004 Community News Group