He came. He saw. He kicked my butt.
Now, if running a third-party political campaign was as easy as beating an editor with an eighth-grade aptitude for chess, David Pechefsky would be cruising to victory in the free-for-all to succeed Councilman Bill DeBlasio.
Chess is “a bit of a gimmick,” Pechefsky admitted, as he set up rooks, bishops, pawns and those horsey pieces in my office the other day. Running as a Green Party candidate in a Park Slope-Carroll Gardens-Windsor Terrace district where there are probably more dead registered voters than Republicans, Pechefsky realizes he has to get his name out there quickly.
And chess accomplishes a few things quickly: It shows that Pechefsky is a geek (which helps you in Park Slope), that he’s smart, and that he’s got some flair (and he’d never gut the “Chess in the Schools” program, either).
Last weekend, he took on all comers by setting up a chess board at the Ninth Street entrance to Prospect Park. The meet-and-beat went well enough that Pechefsky has put aside more time for chess this Sunday, which is why I summoned him to our Downtown Brooklyn office to take the measure of the man (Pechefsky), the myth (that a Green candidate can’t get elected) and the legend (my chess skills).
First, Pechefsky. Despite being a former City Council staffer, the 41-year-old Pechefsky is no company man. In fact, whenever he talks about his three stints on the legislative side of City Hall, he talks about all the “institutional reform” he’d seek if elected. When reminded that voters tend to nap whenever a candidate talks about institutional reform, Pechefsky said his priorities would be getting more pre-K seats in the district (good luck), cleaning the Gowanus Canal (hopefully not personally) and finding a long-term fix for the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (actually, a state responsibility).
Then, the myth. There’s a reason why there are no Green Party — or any real third party — members of the Council. One is brand recognition, of course, but the liberal Pechefsky is facing an even greater challenge than convincing Park Slope Socialists to abandon the Democrats to vote for a Green: he has to get on the ballot.
Arcane state rules require him to collect 2,700 valid petition signatures between mid-July and mid-August. If you know anything about the residents of New York’s tony neighborhoods in the summer, you know that there aren’t many residents of New York’s tony neighborhoods in the summer.
Worse, anyone who signs a petition for a Democratic candidate — who collect their signatures a month earlier — can’t sign for Pechefsky.
If he gets on the ballot, it’ll be a miracle.
Less miraculous, of course, is that he beat me bad in chess. I’m not going to say I didn’t challenge him — at one point, I was one move away from check-mating him (but what move was it?!!?). But I let him slip away. First, his Avella took two of my Fidlers. After that, his Quinn and Weprin continually outflanked my Bloomberg until I finally spitzered after move 29.
Man, I have to do a better job protecting my Yassky.
Play chess with David Pechefsky on Sunday, May 24 at the Ninth Street entrance to Prospect Park (Ninth Street at Prospect Park West in Park Slope) from 10 am–1 pm. For info, visit www.pechefskyforcitycouncil.com.
©2009 Community News Group
By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:
You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.