Nydia: The Gowanus is ‘Sponge’ worthy!

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

The proposed Sponge Park along the banks of the fetid Gowanus Canal is finally living up to its name in one way: it’s soaking up federal money.

A pilot version of the park, whose name actually refers to how it will employ vegetation that would retain water and prevent sewer overflows on rainy days, is looking like a go, thanks to a cool $300,000 earmark sponsored by Rep. Nydia Velazquez (D–Carroll Gardens).

“It would be a great amenity for the city,” said Susannah Drake, an architect. The Sponge Park is the brainchild of her design firm, dlandstudio, and the Gowanus Canal Conservancy. “The water is dirty and we have to start cleaning it up incrementa­lly.”

The House appropriation isn’t enough to build a full-sized greenway alongside the infamous Lavender Lake, but it might be enough for a one-block esplanade. The designers say that plant life can reduce runoff into the canal as well as suck toxins out of the stagnant estuary.

“This project would create much-needed public space, while addressing ongoing environmental concerns. Cleaning up the Gowanus Canal will never be effective if we don’t also come up with solutions like the Sponge Park that prevent future contaminat­ion,” Velazquez said in a statement.

Velazquez’s earmark now awaits Senate approval.

The daring idea to convert one of Brooklyn’s most polluted wastelands into an innovative park was unveiled over a year ago. Since then, the Conservancy has been courting the city for its support and several agencies have signaled their interest in the project.

But the political landscape has shifted since the Sponge Park idea was born. Now, the city and federal government are locked in a debate about how to clean the Gowanus.

The Environmental Protection Agency favors declaring the foul canal a Superfund site, a program that would force polluters, often with lengthy court battles, to pay for the bulk of the cleanup. The city argues it can do the work faster through its own proposal, an untested approach of voluntary cooperation from polluters and funding from the US Army Corps of Engineers.

Updated 5:13 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

skeptikal from gowanus says:
Which Gowanus property owner will contribute no strings attached land for this program? What happens to the run-off that gets absorbed into the sewer system on its way down the hill - it will bypass Sponge Park. 300K is a drop in the bucket. Green Streets in Gowanus must have cost at least that much - and look at them now. No maintenance. Trashed.
June 29, 2009, 1:25 pm
061709 from Brookyn says:
""The water is dirty and we have to start cleaning it up incrementally.""

An incremental cleanup is better than no cleanup. But a full force assault on the problem makes much more sense especially if speed is an issue.
June 29, 2009, 10:09 pm
interested from all says:
was wondering if the epa would be using the sponge park to put the dredge machines on during the "superfund cleanup"
June 30, 2009, 4:50 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: