Editorial: Bloomy’s takeover does not ensure a real Brooklyn Bridge Park

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Mayor Bloomberg’s announcement that the city will take over the construction of the unbuilt portions of Brooklyn Bridge Park has changed very little for the Brooklynites who will use this supposedly public park.

Certainly, anything that moves construction of the waterfront development’s open space — and wrests control from the big-business-dominated Empire State Development Corporation — must be seen as positive.

But Mayor Bloomberg’s commitment of $55 million in construction funding — with more supposedly coming in the future — is paltry. And the “takeover” of the park is just a paper chase; instead of the Brooklyn Bridge Park Development Corporation, which is one of our state’s myriad public “authorities” that operate with little oversight, Mayor Bloomberg’s Brooklyn Bridge Park would also be overseen by a new public authority called “the Brooklyn Bridge Park Operating Entity.”

Lipstick, meet pig.

Most important, Bloomberg’s unwillingness to abandon the park development’s central flaw — that its annual maintenance budget must be financed through fees on commercial, residential, retail or dining operations inside the park’s footprint — shows that Brooklynites are still not getting what we have long dreamed about: a genuine park.

Sen. Daniel Squadron has put forth a reasonable tweak of the park’s self-financing scheme, namely, skimming off a bit of the newly hiked property taxes after non-residential buildings near the park flip to residential use.

But, for now, that financing scheme is still just a legislator’s proposal.

Bloomberg told a Brooklyn Paper reporter on Wednesday that for now, the plan still calls for housing and other revenue-producing entities inside the development rather than doing what we have long demanded: placing the 1.7-mile strip of green under control of the city Parks Department, which maintains parks the old-fashioned way — through the city budget process, where everyone from elected officials to watchdog groups to special interests get to fight it out.

Devoid of that public process, what we will get at Brooklyn Bridge Park is what we have decried for years: a public park that is not public at all, but an expensively landscaped front and back yard for the housing that will be built within it.

Posted 12:00 am, March 11, 2010
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Reasonable discourse

Fourth Estate from DUMBO says:
And yet your paper endorsed the man, what did you expect?
March 11, 2010, 11:06 am
Scott from Staten Island says:
To FE:

That's idiotic.

A reasonable person wouldn't expect an endorsement to require agreement on EVERY issue.

Sometimes you have to take the good with the bad.
March 11, 2010, 7:02 pm
Pacholo from Red Hook says:
Besides walking what else does this overrate place offer?
March 11, 2010, 9:42 pm
Fourth Estate from DUMBO says:
To scott from Staten Island,

Sorry, but do you even read this paper? Or how about any of the others in NYC that endorsed the King up until election day, and turned around shortly after to complain about every single thing the king does.

Or how the Brooklyn Paper inundated it's web readers with mindless "gets the job done" banners and now are complaining about a project that should have been already done.
March 12, 2010, 2:42 pm
Adrian Benepeon from City Haul says:
Hope no one strips at the windows of 1 Brooklyn Bridge Park like people do at High Line.
March 13, 2010, 12:18 am
Dave from Brooklyn Heights says:
Except with Bloomberg, you get the bad with the bad.
March 21, 2010, 8:45 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Don’t miss out!

Stay in touch with the stories people are talking about in your neighborhood:

Optional: Help us tailor our newsletters to you!