Sections

Money? What money? Beep slams developer for claiming he’d fund Greenpoint Hospital project

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

Borough President Markowitz slammed the Queens-based developers of the Greenpoint Hospital site for making the “wrong” claim that he would underwrite the project with $3.9 million.

Great American Construction won the bid to redevelop the empty hospital building partly on a claim that it has secured funding from the borough president. Problem is, it had not.

“It [is] certainly wrong to anticipate that I would be providing what is noted,” Markowitz told Housing Commissioner Rafael Cestero last week. “You may want to reconsider the assumptions of the feasibility of the project before determining that it is worthy to pursue.”

Specifically, Great American claimed that it had locked up $1.7 million for the $52.3-million Greenpoint Hospital site, plus another $2.2 million to help build a $17-million senior housing facility and community center on Olive Street.

It simply could not be true, said a spokesman for Markowitz, because “we were never asked for, nor have we provided any funding for, this project.”

The amount requested by Great American “exceed the funds that he has provided to individual housing projects during his tenure,” the spokesman added.

Great American Construction and Bronx-based Lemle and Wolff won a highly competitive bidding process in April to develop affordable housing on the site of the former neighborhood hospital — beating out a Greenpoint-based group that had campaigned for housing on the hospital site after it closed 28 years ago.

The Greenpoint Renaissance Enterprise Corporation — a losing bidder — sued the city in August in order to stop the project.

And this week, the group hailed Markowitz’s intercession.

“You have to take the politics out of our everyday lives,” said Greenpoint Renaissance member Diane Jackson. “We don’t need an outside organization coming from the Bronx. We know what your community want and the [our] project is based on that.”

A spokesman for the Department of Housing and Preservation Development declined to comment because of the pending litigation. The process to convert the defunct hospital into housing began with discussions 28 years and has been rife with confusion and controversy ever since.

The city finally sought developers for the site three years ago.

Updated 5:21 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:


Reasonable discourse

Marty Farty from Party says:
Give more and you may receive!
Oct. 28, 2010, 11:05 am
Karen Leader from Cooper Park Housess says:
St. Nicks Alliance is our neighborhoods competent non-profit developers who has a long track record of developing affordable housing projects - and- whose priority is not "profit" - but how our commuity may best benefit from their projects and how they can best meet the needs of our community! I am hopeful that those involved will realize the mistake they've made in awarding this site to the Bronx based private developer and reverse their decision. Afterward, awarding this site to St. Nick's Alliance...
Oct. 28, 2010, 6:01 pm
Mike from GP says:
I honestly don't know anything about this issue, but considering Marty's mendacity and slimyness about Atlantic Yards, the Prospect Park West traffic calming, etc., I don't know how we can take this buffoon seriously.
Oct. 28, 2010, 9:03 pm
Tony from williamsburg says:
Hey karen which ever group gets to built it , their will always be a fight .the bottom line is ,that the community will get senior housing .so please ALL OF YOU AT GREG stop the fighting .lets just start to build it and hopefully we can still live to see this project .if not we will wait another 28 years as we did till now
Oct. 31, 2010, 4:19 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: