Sweet movie: Domino doc explores controversial project

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

A new documentary about the plan to turn Williamsburg’s former Domino Sugar factory into a massive housing development has all the trappings of a festival circuit favorite: a grandiose plot, an historic setting, a punny title, lots of conflict, and plenty of twists.

Filmmakers Megan Sperry, Brian Paul and Daniel Phelps chronicled North Brooklyn’s largest development project — which calls for building high-rises and 2,200 units of housing at the former waterfront industrial site — in their nearly finished documentary “The Domino Effect.”

We decided to check in with the moviemakers, who might be sitting on a suprprise ending after last week’s shocking news that Domino’s builder defaulted on its $120-million loan and has been shopping the closed sugar factory around.

Aaron Short: Could you have asked for better timing?

Megan Sperry: Selling the property was always a possibility. We knew it was going to happen, whether it was six months or six years, because it kept coming up in conversation with residents.

Brian Paul: It seemed inevitable at the time. There was a lot of confidence. When people suggested that this might never get built, they were thought of as crazy.

Daniel Phelps: CPCR put so much money into the sale of an idea, but their books weren’t open. That’s why there was so much speculation.

AS: You interviewed lots of public officials, but why are most of them cut from the film?

BP: You could cut Domino opponents Councilman Steve Levin (D–Williamsbu­rg) and Assemblyman Vito Lopez (D–Williamsbu­rg) to make them seem like heroes, which wouldn’t be accurate.

DP: We decided to cut them because of the complexity of local politics in Brooklyn. For viewers from outside the neighborhood, explaining the competing factions of the local Democratic party is too complex.

MS: We didn’t have them being emotional, except on the steps of City hall. Councilwoman Diana Reyna (D–Williamsbu­rg), a Domino supporter, was very melodramatic, but when we sat down with her, she was full of contradictions.

BP: We didn’t want to make Diana into a villain in this. Vito is killing industrial businesses in other parts of Williamsburg because of the Loft Law and Diana is trying to keep manufacturing jobs.

AS: Who’s ultimately to blame for the rezoning of the site and the stalled project?

DP: Mayor Bloomberg’s policies. The mayor gave up all hope for manufacturing.

BP: The vision of the Brooklyn waterfront as a giant Battery Park City comes from the power of the real estate interests in the city. The mayor seems to measure economic development by Frank Gehry buildings.

DP: There’s a disconnect between policymakers and the working class. This administration is not making decisions for the working class. There’s an insensitivity of the redesign of these neighborhoods.

MS: It’s easy to blame Bloomberg, but there’s been a continuous process to subsidize privately developed housing since the 1980s.

AS: What’s the most haunting imagery from the film? I think it’s the archival footage inside the Domino factory in the early 1990s.

MS: We got that from Isabel Hill, who directed “Made in Brooklyn.” Workers were talking about the factory being turned into luxury condos even 18 years ago.

DP: Doesn’t that suck in retrospective? Everybody saw it coming.

AS: What will happen to the Domino project?

MS: It will eventually get developed, but CPCR will not develop it.

BP: You have a memorandum of understanding signed by CPCR for 30 percent affordable housing. If someone else buys the property, they don’t have to follow that. And they can build something as ugly as The Edge.

DP: Breaking it up is the only way. It makes so much sense now.

AS: What are your goals for this film?

BP: We hope the conversation can be expanded beyond what type of condo can be developed on the Domino site. Why not have the city build housing directly. It’s called public housing.

MS: You’re not even allowed to think about public housing these days, but it can be anything. It doesn’t have to be ugly.

Updated 5:31 pm, July 9, 2018: Story updated to correct errors in transcription.
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

anywho says:
As long a government tries to be in the business of building housing and subsidizing it; situations like Domino will continue to happen.

All the hoopla and what happened? The economy tanked and the project goes down the drain. How about knocking that ugly as* thing down and building park?
March 19, 2012, 9:18 am
Mike from Williamsburg says:
The ways to make housing affordable are to make the housing unnaturally suck so that no one with a choice would pay for it or to make a whole lot of housing. The way to make housing expensive is to artificially protect manufacturing on prime waterfront land.

"AS: Who’s ultimately to blame for the rezoning of the site and the stalled project?"

A stalled project is something that it makes sense to talk about blame for. Enabling housing in a housing-starved market is not.
March 19, 2012, 9:25 am
JJ says:
This was a joke , they are morally corrupt and deceptive liars
June 11, 2014, 10:02 am

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: