Sections

Locals rally to save Double-D pool from feds’ closure plan

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

Dozens of fans of the beloved Double-D pool rallied at the oasis near the banks of the Gowanus Canal to tell the feds that they don’t want their watering hole turned into a raw sewage depository.

The federal Environmental Protection Agency may force the city to excavate some of the Thomas Greene Playground and the adjoining pool so a gigantic holding tank could be installed to store water during storms as part of the so-called Superfund cleanup of the filthy waterway, ensuring less raw sewage flows into Brooklyn’s nautical purgatory.

But on Saturday, neighbors wary that the pool — which has served the community for more than 40 years — will be closed for a lengthy period of time, said such a move would be a major blow to people who rely on it to keep cool during hot summer days.

“They may never put our pool back and it will be out of commission for years. It’s a shame to take it out of the community,” said Linda Blyer, a Cobble Hill resident and a member of Friends of Douglass-Greene Park, the advocacy group that organized the rally.

The group says that it’s in favor of getting the canal cleaned up. Yet, in April, it started an online petition against the placement of the tank that would sacrifice the pool. The petition now has close to 1,000 signatures.

Federal officials consider the ground underneath the pool to be a prime location because the tank must be built on city-owned land and close to the sewer pipe that spews out the majority of wastewater into the canal. The pool is a block away from the canal.

The protestors said it is crucial that the community not be left without a pool, and demanded that if the federal government decides to place the tank there, then a replacement must be provided during the pool’s closure, which the feds said would likely last two to three years.

“We need our community provided for before, after, and during the cleanup,” said group member and Gowanus resident Sabine Aronowsky, who often brings her two-year-old daughter to the pool.

The demonstrators said that the replacement pool must remain in the neighborhood and offer free breakfast and lunch to kids when school is out, just as the Double-D pool does.

The pool’s future is also threatened because it sits directly above a plot of contaminated land where the former Fulton Manufactured Gas Plant functioned from 1879 to 1929. The state may require energy giant National Grid to clean up the polluted land, which will also include excavation.

The Environmental Protection Agency will release its finalized Superfund cleanup plan this summer.

“We want to make sure that whatever happens, we have a pool to serve these communities,” said Brooklyn Heights district leader Jo Anne Simon at the rally. Simon is also a founding member of the Friends of Douglass-Greene Park.

It’s not the first time residents have rallied behind the Double D. Back in June 2010, the city planned to close the pool due to budget cuts, but rallies by residents and politicians, including Borough President Markowitz, kept it open.

Reach reporter Natalie Musumeci at nmusumeci@cnglocal.com or by calling (718) 260-4505. Follow her at twitter.com/souleddout.
Updated 10:12 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

Phil from Gowanus says:
"so-called Superfund"? Is that a crack, or is this paper now gonna turn into another outlet for deniers about the need for the cleanup of the Canal?
What's next? Gonna go after that so-called global warming? Maybe it's only alleged that cigarettes cause cancer! And what about our so-called President, who claims he wasn't born in Kenya!

Maybe diehipster is actually the editor, if there even is one!
July 3, 2013, 10:48 am
Chris from Gowanus says:
Don't forget NYCDEP's outright denial of the very need for interceptor tanks. They're already hooked on spending hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars every couple decades to redesign a bigger and better hopelessly nonfunctional sewage ejector system at the flushing tunnel.

The EPA has done a commendable job by taking the first step at offering potential solutions to some big problems that are, ultimately, our problems to solve. Got a better city-owned location idea for the tank? Take it to the Community Action Group. Want dewatering operations and confined disposal solutions that could fairly benefit both residents and local businesses? There's a slew of nonprofits and design and engineering schools that have been notably absent from the critical path that's being facilitated right now by the EPA.

By all means though, tell us more about the "dozens" of neighbors that demand the legacy polluters provide them with a replacement swimming pool instead of a viable long-term solution for their kids and their neighbors.
July 3, 2013, 2:02 pm
Chris from Gowanus says:
Don't forget NYCDEP's outright denial of the very need for interceptor tanks. They're already hooked on spending hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars every couple decades to redesign a bigger and better hopelessly nonfunctional sewage ejector system at the flushing tunnel.

The EPA has done a commendable job by taking the first step at offering potential solutions to some big problems that are, ultimately, our problems to solve. Got a better city-owned location idea for the tank? Take it to the Community Action Group. Want dewatering operations and confined disposal solutions that could fairly benefit both residents and local businesses? There's a slew of nonprofits and design and engineering schools that have been notably absent from the critical path that's being facilitated right now by the EPA.

By all means though, tell us more about the "dozens" of neighbors that demand the legacy polluters provide them with a replacement swimming pool instead of a viable long-term solution for their kids and their neighbors.
July 3, 2013, 2:02 pm
Larry from the neighborhood says:
With so many levels of toxic exposure in all aspects of our society, why would any parent want to take their young children to swim in a pool built over the toxic waste of an old coal tar manufacture?

Isn't it hypocritical to require landlords to abate lead paint and asbestos only to have the parents knowing take their children to a such a brownfield site to play in?
July 4, 2013, 7:50 am

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter:

Optional: