Activists: Brooklyn Bridge Park honchos lying about finances

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Brooklyn Bridge Park has enough money coming in to be paid for forever and plans for two more residential towers on the park should be scrapped, according to activists, citing a newly released analysis of the park’s finances.

The sprawling waterfront green space is supposed to be complete by 2017, and the residential high-rises lining it are supposed to fund its operation and maintenance in perpetuity. The board that runs the project, which is privately rather than city-operated, says funding it will take seven towers, five of them residential. But activists, including members of the park’s Community Advisory Council, say that the five towers built and under construction will do the job, and that the numbers show there is no need for the final two planned for Pier 6.

“The financial information provided by the Brooklyn Bridge Park Corporation has been contradicted and challenged by financial experts in the community,” said Sandy Balboza, a member of the advisory group.

Balboza demanded that the board alter its plans at its Nov. 7 meeting at Saint Francis College, where a group called People for Green Space presented the financial analysis. Activists with the group argued that the projections given by park honchos to justify building luxury housing in the park do not extend far enough into the future to accurately show how much money the park will generate over time.

“This park is going to be here for 100 years,” said Henry Richmond, a financial analyst who lives in One Brooklyn Bridge Park. “We should be looking at the funding over a long period of time.”

The group’s report criticizes park administrators for only calculating revenues through 2018, while tax breaks on residential developments in the park begin expiring in 2020. They also said that appreciating property values in the area mean that the taxes collected for these properties will far exceed original projections.

“The property values are massively higher,” Richmond said. “Let’s make sure we’re making decisions based on the right figures.”

During the meeting, park president Regina Myer touted recently opened recreational facilities in the park, and said nearly all of the parkland will be complete by 2017. Afterwards, she said the board will review the community group’s analysis.

The influential Brooklyn Heights Association weighed in late last month with a letter to Myer asking for a detailed breakdown of the project’s finances, and calling for lowering the height of the planned 30-story tower at Pier 6, the taller of the two proposed high-rises.

“We believe that a 315-foot structure is simply too tall and we ask that BBPC significantly reduce the size of the structure,” wrote Carolyn Ziegler, a member of the civic group’s parks committee. “We request for ourselves and the larger community your revenue and cost projections and assumptions in sufficient detail and for a sufficient time frame for us to review and fully understand your anticipated long-term financial requiremen­ts.”

A lawsuit filed by People for Green Space resulted in a temporary restraining order that prohibits the park from selecting a developer for the Pier 6 projects. The next court hearing is Dec. 3.

Reach reporter Matthew Perlman at (718) 260–8310. E-mail him at Follow him on Twitter @matthewjperlman.
Updated 10:17 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

judahspechal from bedstuy says:

-The idea that BBP will have more than enough money & don't need these buildings is just narrow minded.
-Least we forget the hundreds of neglected parks, that this extra money can help. Which should be highly consider, because the next battle for theses folks will be BBP is overcrowded w/outsiders.
-Well guess what, build the housing, give some of that un-needed funds to other parks renovation, maybe bringing some amentites to those parks.
Nov. 12, 2014, 1:01 pm
Jim from Cobble Hill says:
Those towers are getting built. The only reason the 1% allowed that park is so they could have their money and the plans were set in stone during the reign of king Bloomberg, and they'll never be undone. We are not people to them so they couldn't give a shiit about any park space we get.
Nov. 12, 2014, 3:14 pm
ladybug from hydrant says:
"God is in the details." -LMR
Nov. 12, 2014, 8:01 pm
snake from big apple says:
A lot of you are baby making machines. Having too many kids, too young, incapable of caring for them and their futures, taking up space.
Nov. 13, 2014, 8:34 am
scott from park slope says:
Snake, how many is too many? >2.1, the replacement birthrate? Because that will leave out a lot of communities in Brooklyn that have bigger families than that, like the Jewish areas of Williamsburg and Crown Heights. it leaves out a lot of other families from every other part of the spectrum, too.
Nov. 13, 2014, 4:17 pm
scott from park slope says:
The Brooklyn Bridge Park is nice, but they don't try very hard to make it accessible. on the south end there's one bus stop. on the north end you have to walk quite a bit to get there. so it becomes a de facto private park for the wealthy in those new towers.
Nov. 13, 2014, 4:19 pm
snake from big apple says:
Scott, I know it sounds horribly sad. Better to face up to the facts sooner than later, as it's a global phenomena.
Nov. 13, 2014, 8:45 pm
hEIGHTS GUY . from Downtown says:
Heres the situation , they are going to build and build and build and build and no one is going to stop them , too much money to much power,just look at the building that is going to block the Brooklyn bridge,and no on Fulton street its one building after another going up , it out of control and nothing is going to stop it .............
Nov. 13, 2014, 11:29 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: