Sections

Gutterball! Owner of former Maple Lanes backspins on promised parking

Knock ‘em down, set ‘em up: Developers bowled over the old Maple Lanes Bowling Alley in Mapleton in late March to begin construction on 13 six-story apartment buildings, but the property owners aren’t planning to provide any parking, according to city records.
The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

They’re quieter than the final frame of a championship game.

Developers bowled over Maple Lanes in Bensonhurst last week to make way for an apartment complex, but they are mum on details about the project — including why they suddenly changed designs and why they aren’t providing any parking for the 128-unit development.

When the city rezoned the lot at 1560 60th Street from manufacturing to residential in 2012, property owner Abraham Leser said he planned to build a series of four-story townhouses, a synagogue, and parking spaces, but plans he submitted at the end of last year call for 13 six-story buildings and give no indication the massive development will include any parking.

Critics say Leser is skirting zoning regulations by building separate structures just small enough to avoid triggering the requirement to provide off-street parking, and the city doesn’t seem to care.

“They figured out how to get around it,” said Tom Murphy, the reader who tipped this paper off to the lack of lot space. “It’s a very dense residential area, and there’s no push-back from the city saying ‘you cant do this.’ ”

The Department of City Planning and the Department of Buildings did not immediately return requests for comment.

Peter LaSpina opened the famed 48-lane bowling alley in 1960. His son John got the city to rezone the lot in 2012 from light manufacturing to R6A, which allows medium-density apartment buildings, and sold the business a year later for $17.5 million, because the land was worth more than the alley, he said.

At the time, Leser told the city he was planning a series of townhouses comprising 112 units and 56 underground parking spots, and promised — verbally — to stick to that design when he filed plans. The community board, then-Borough President Marty Markowitz, and the City Planning Commission all approved the rezoning — commending the developer’s pledge not to alter his designs.

But Leser apparently has more backspin than a 10-pin pickup. He filed plans with the city in December 2014 calling for 13 separate six-story buildings — and no parking. Three of the proposed structures would hold six apartments each, and the rest would hold 11 apartments apiece, according to the plans.

Zoning requires builders provide a parking spot for half of all dwelling units created, but the city waves the requirement on buildings that would trigger five or fewer spaces. If all the apartments were in one building, the city would require 64 parking spaces, according to zoning regulations. But dicing the project up into 13 buildings lets Leser side-step the parking requirement, Murphy said.

Attempts to reach Leser for comment achieved nothing but gutterballs.

Assemblyman Dov Hikind (D–Borough Park) said the property owner personally confirmed on March 27 that there will be parking, but could not provide details or point to any public record backing up the claim.

“I specifically remember the issue of parking was raised by me, was raised by others, and that was all part of the plan, and as I said, I double-checked today to make sure that was still part of it,” Hikind said. “Who’s going to build a project in Borough Park with no parking — it makes no sense.”

Maple Lanes isn’t the first — and it’s likely not the last — borough bowling alley to face the wrecking ball, as newfangled tech toys pick up more of folks’ spare time. The last alley to go before Maple Lanes was Bay Ridge’s Mark Lanes, which made way for a parking lot in 2006. Brooklyn still has a fair amount of bowling alleys, but none come close to the size of Maple Lanes. Shell Lanes in Gravesend has 16 fewer lanes, while the 34-lane Strike 10 Lanes on Strickland Avenue in Mill Basin — formerly Gil Hodges Lanes — turned about half its lanes into a gym in 2003.

Reach reporter Max Jaeger at mjaeger@cnglocal.com or by calling (718) 260–8303. Follow him on Twitter @JustTheMax.
Updated 10:17 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:


Reasonable discourse

Mike from Williamsburg says:
What wonderful news! Cars are a scourge and have no place in a city.
March 30, 2015, 7:39 am
ty from pps says:
you don't need a car.
March 30, 2015, 8:36 am
Resident from Brooklyn says:
“It’s a very dense residential area."

This is why adding more parking is a bad idea. This developer is right. More housing, fewer cars, less congestion for the people who walk and take transit in the area. A win all around.
March 30, 2015, 8:37 am
Daniel from Flatbush says:
I looked on the map and it is two blocks from two separate subways. It seems silly for anyone to want parking that close to mass transit.
March 30, 2015, 8:45 am
Ace from New Utrecht says:
Great News! Parking minimums in a city so rich in public transportation never made any sense to me. I suspect they were there to protect all the free on street parking that the city currently provides.
March 30, 2015, 8:48 am
D from Queens says:
You're like two or three blocks from both the D & the N trains. And there's thousands upon thousands of six story apartment buildings all over Brooklyn that don't have parking. Clearly, there's a market. The developer wouldn't be doing it if they didn't think it'd be financially feasible.
March 30, 2015, 8:48 am
R from NY says:
Just check out the Walk Score for this area. No need for parking.

https://www.walkscore.com/score/1560-60th-st-brooklyn-ny-11219
March 30, 2015, 10:02 am
boof from brooklyn says:
Cars are anti-urban.
March 30, 2015, 10:38 am
Jimmy from Flatbush says:
Oh, Dov Hikind said the developer promised, so it must be true. Dov Hikind certainly isn't an opportunistic, unprinciplesd sleazeball that panders to whatever group he thinks will let him keep his job.
March 30, 2015, 11:22 am
Tal Barzilai from Pleasantville, NY says:
I can't stop farting.
March 30, 2015, 1:04 pm
Ed Zeppole from Bensonhurst-By-The-Sea says:
Cars?? FEH! Evolve already, won't ya?
March 30, 2015, 8:38 pm
Tal Barzilai from Pleasantville, NY says:
Disregarding whoever impersonated me, I feel that parking premiums are still a need because it will mean lesser cars parking on the streets and circling for parking spaces, though I do know that there are always going to be those who hate the use of cars no matter what.
April 2, 2015, 2:47 pm
Jonathan from Brooklyn says:
If there was a need for parking, people would be willing to pay for it and someone would build it. "Free" parking is paid for by everyone, including those without cars.
April 2, 2015, 10:14 pm
Tal Barzilai from Pleasantville, NY says:
Actually, there are apartment buildings that do charge residents or tenants for parking or include them with what their purchase or rental, so not all of them are subsidized.
April 3, 2015, 3:16 pm
itisi from brooklyn says:
What Jimmy from Flatbush said. Add David Greenfield to his comment as well.
April 3, 2015, 9:48 pm
james from bensonhurst says:
" "Free" parking is paid for by everyone, including those without cars."

and those without cars pay far fewer taxes . Way fewer. No parking will just make the parking situation in the area far worse. Your walk ability score assumes people are going to Manhattan and don't have families. Try getting a car load of stuff from costco home one the subway with 3 children!!! . Subway system is only good to get you to and from Manhattan . Not to get you cross Brooklyn.
April 10, 2015, 1:54 pm
boof from brooklyn says:
Considering that most city households are car free, with the greatest concentration of car-free households in Manhattan, I doubt seriously your contention than car owners pay more taxes.

Also, the car-specific fees (including registration and gas tax) only cover about half of the costs of maintaining car infrastructure.
April 14, 2015, 1:39 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: