Sections

Wait, that new building sounds familiar...

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Seasoned Brooklyn Paper readers will remember the long and controversial history of the development at Dock and Water streets that is suddenly back in the news — one that involved both secret internal memos, first-rate investigative journalism, and documentarian Ken Burns — but for those who don’t, here is a refresher.

Prolific Dumbo developers David and Jed Walentas of Two Trees Management first proposed erecting a 16-story apartment complex at Water and Dock streets in 2004. But both the local community board and then-Borough President Marty Markowitz rejected their bid to rezone the land for residential use on the grounds that the building would block neighbors’ views of the Brooklyn Bridge, and the father-and-son real estate magnates ultimately shelved the project ahead of a doomed Council vote.

The Walentases then acquired more land near the site and returned with a new plan in 2007 — this time an 18-story building farther from the bridge, with some below-market-rate units and space for a 300-seat middle school to sweeten the deal.

But many locals once again railed against the project, claiming it would still block views of the bridge — which an investigation by this paper disproved — and also that the subsidized school space would stop the city considering other options for a new middle-school in the area.

In June 2008, the city’s School Construction Authority told them this wasn’t an issue, as the neighborhood didn’t really need a new public middle-school at the time, but then changed its tune in August, when it came out in favor of the project.

But in March 2009, internal School Construction Authority documents obtained through freedom of information requests revealed the authority was actually negotiating with the Walentases behind the scenes when it said a middle-school was not needed, and debate raged as to whether the city had seriously considered other sites in the area.

Several celebrities then joined the fight against the high-rise — including Pulitzer Prize-winning historian David McCullough, who penned “The Great Bridge,” Ken Burns, who made a documentary based on the book, and actress Helen Hunt, whose interest remains unclear to this day.

But the Council nevertheless overwhelmingly approved the rezoning in June 2009 — a rare instance of council members voting against the wishes of the local member — so long as Two Trees shaved one story off the tower, following green lights from both the community board and Markowitz.

In October that year, more documents came to light revealing the School Construction Authority’s own architect had in 2007 deemed the Walentases’ middle-school plans “compromised” by city standards, as the 46,000-square-foot educational center offered limited space and a “gym” that did not live up to its name due to low ceilings.

The authority claimed the architect had raised the concerns early in the negotiation process, and they had since been addressed.

Activists then sued to halt the development, claiming the developer and several city departments colluded to win the zoning changes and that city officials didn’t conduct a through examination of the school proposal. But a judge ultimately dismissed the suit, and the city and developers officially inked a deal for the new middle-school space in 2011.

Reach reporter Harry MacCormack at hmaccormack@cnglocal.com or by calling (718) 260–2511. Follow him on Twitter @HMacBKPaper.

Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Reasonable discourse

Hardwick Dicksinson from Red hook says:
Suck it mccullough!
http://www.theonion.com/article/david-mccullough-wondering-how-much-scratch-he-cou-33515
Oct. 15, 2015, 6:39 pm
Ursula from Downtown Brooklyn says:
If I remember correctly, the principal reason for the rejection of Two Trees Management's first Dock Street project was the less than legally required distance of the planned building to the roadway of the Brooklyn Bridge. Views of the Brooklyn Bridge are not protected by law; the only views protected by law in New York City are those that are within a fan-shaped "view shed" from the Brooklyn Heights Promenade. The rejection of Two Trees' plan led the company to move the high-rise away from the bridge toward Washington Street, with the Front/Dock Street corner of the lower building section having inched toward, or possibly extending slightly underneath, the bridge's Manhattan-bound roadway overhead.
Oct. 16, 2015, 11:04 am

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Don’t miss out!

Stay in touch with the stories people are talking about in your community:

Optional: Help us tailor our newsletters to you!