Sections

✔ Poll

Prison activist: Moving inmates from Rikers to Brooklyn would be win for residents

Raising the bar: An ex-con turned criminal justice reform activist says it would be a good thing if the city closes Rikers and sends more Brooklynites to jail in theitr home borough.
Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

It is good for what jails you!

The proposed closure of scandal-plagued Rikers Island would be a boon for the borough, says one prisoner advocate, allowing Brooklynites awaiting trial to stay in safer local facilities that are much closer to their loved ones and the courts. Locals are already objecting to housing more inmates or new jails in their backyard, but they should stop being so selfish, he said.

“It’s almost obnoxious to hear people in Brooklyn push back on the idea of building a new, safer jail or rehabbing an old jail,” said Glenn Martin, an ex-con who was born and raised in Bedford-Stuvyvesant and is now president of Just Leadership USA, whose goal is to cut the country’s prison population in half by 2030.

A growing chorus of pols are demanding the city close the notoriously brutal jail complex, but that would require it to find somewhere else to house the approximately 7,200 inmates behind bars there — which means building new facilities, expanding existing ones, or dramatically reducing the number of inmates in the system.

Currently, there are only around 3,000 other jail beds around New York — 800 of which are at Boerum Hill’s Brooklyn House of Detention on Atlantic Avenue, the borough’s only city-run jail, which usually houses around 600 at any given time, according to Corrections Department statistics.

The city already floated the idea of making Brooklyn’s big house even bigger in 2010. It scrapped that proposal amidst massive community opposition, expanding Rikers instead, and neighbors say they would fight any attempts to put it back on the table.

“We would continue to be against any expansion at the site,” said Howard Kolins, president of civic group Boerum Hill Association, though he says the current facility is a good neighbor and he supports overhauling Rikers in general. “We think it becomes a burden on the community.”

But Martin — who spent a year in Rikers for armed robbery — says moving more Brooklyn yardbirds to their home borough would take them out of the toxic environment at Rikers and give them the chance to be closer to support services and court houses, which can help speed up trials.

“Community-based jails create opportunities for people to be closer to their families, social services, lawyers,” he said.

However, Martin says the city won’t necessarily need larger — or more — slammers if the city can shrink the number of people awaiting trials behind bars.

He believes it can be done by decriminalizing minor and non-violent offenses such as public urination and littering that often lead to jail time when people fail to show up to court dates, eliminating cash bail that many low-income residents can’t afford, and speeding up trials so inmates spend less time languishing — Martin claims that reducing the average wait from 150–200 days to 100 days would cut the city’s inmate population by 1,000 people.

Council speaker Melissa Mark-Viverito has now formed a commission to study strategies to reduce Rikers’ population, which will look at the impact of these reforms, in addition to supervised release, raising the age of criminal responsibility, and using community justice centers instead of courts.

The year-long study will need to work out a way to prune Rikers’ residents down to at least 5,000 to make closure a reality, according to Councilman Brad Lander (D–Park Slope), who is sitting on the panel.

Reach reporter Lauren Gill at lgill@cnglocal.com or by calling (718) 260–2511. Follow her on Twitter @laurenk_gill

Reader poll

Should the city close Rikers? And should the inmates come to Brooklyn?

Updated 10:17 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:


Reasonable discourse

salvatore says:
A year for armed robbery? At that rate of punishment, public urination should come with a cash reward.
March 15, 2016, 9:22 am
Marsha Rimler from brooklyn heights says:
So.. Brad Lander .. the would be Mayor is on the panel..He is all about giving public property to real estate developers at low prices.. and mining their contributions as he continues his quest for power and higher office.. He is a library destroyer
He will do whatever his bosses in real estate think is best for their pocketbooks. He will cover it up in a way that seems he is doing good for the greater society.
He is a phony progresssive. Be Careful NYC and Brooklyn
March 15, 2016, 11:06 am
Law & Disorder from Brooklyn says:
Get out of NY Fast. Now I am retired we are going.
I have seen it all and it is getting worse.Criminals have all the rites you and I do not.
March 15, 2016, 11:48 am
ty from pps says:
affordable housing in Brooklyn - but it needs bike racks.
March 15, 2016, 12:36 pm
Jamie from Carroll Gardens says:
How empty would life be without this bitter Marsha Rimler character making accusation she ought to be sued for because she doesn't agree with someone's position on a library!

Bitter, bitter, bitter bitter! And libelous!
March 15, 2016, 3:17 pm
up carrot says:
Thank you Jamie. I think the laws regarding libel for elected officials are pretty liberal (or would that be conservative?) but your comment is sincerely appreciated.
March 15, 2016, 5:02 pm
Katherine from Heights says:
Maybe developers have their eye on Rikers? The next castle in the sky?

Anyone else loose cell reception when passing by the Boerum Hill facility? Sort of Twilight Zone.
March 15, 2016, 9:03 pm
Katherine says:
lose. to hell with spell check
March 15, 2016, 9:07 pm
Eric T. says:
7 years for sexual assaults on 2 teens? Something is mos definitely wrong, http://nyti.ms/1SRwg57

Do the jails have any reform activities, art classes? continuing ed? psychiatric treatment?
March 16, 2016, 3:45 pm
not in the game from gotham says:
This person is nuts! The only people who WILL benefit from this is the landowner(s) or the sites where these offenders and ex offenders will be held. The only people who will suffer is the nabes where these inmates will be. Picture Bubba coming back after 5-10 years (or more) and running smack dab into the person responsible for him going to jail...
Yep. that'll work.
March 17, 2016, 9:29 pm
Tom McNamara from Downtown Brooklyn says:
Rather than making things easier for criminals to be near their "loved ones", why not educate them on how to stay out of jail, i.e.: obeying the law, paying fines, not urinating in public, not drinking in public, and basically stop acting like animals. Making things easier for criminals is for third world countries.
Most of us obey the law, it's really not that hard....
March 18, 2016, 8:23 am

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: