Sections

F outta here! F express will halve rush-hour service at Brownstone stops

Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

F this!

The Metropolitan Transportation Authority will cut rush-hour F-train service in half at six Brownstone Brooklyn stops next year in order to create an express service for more far-flung users of the line, officials announced Monday, angering local straphangers who say they will have to suffer longer wait times and dangerously overcrowded stations as a result.

“I’m not happy,” said Windsor Terrace resident Aurelie Letocard, who rides the F between Jay Street–MetroTech and her home near the 15th Street-Prospect Park stop during her daily commute to and from Manhattan. “Jay is already absolutely horrible, so if people hear it’s an express and don’t take it, the platform is going to be extremely busy.”

And the transit agency’s own data is providing them with ammunition against the plan, which will see every second orange bullet heading towards Manhattan in the morning, and Coney Island in the evening, zoom past the Bergen Street, Carroll Street, Smith–Ninth, Fourth Avenue, 15th Street, and Fort Hamilton Parkway stops starting in fall 2017.

A study — which it completed a year ago but refused to release until this week — found 51 percent of passengers on the line will be “inconvenie­nced,” waiting up to five minutes more for their rides, and predicts particularly bad bottlenecks at the Bergen and Carroll stops as crowds attempt to exit their narrow staircases.

Councilman Brad Lander (D–Park Slope) laid into agency honchos at a hearing in City Hall on Monday after learning about the plan via a Daily News report that morning then finally getting a look at the long suppressed study, accusing them of sucker-punching him with the scheme that will “screw” tens of thousands of his constituents.

“Now that I’ve read the report I understand why you’ve blindsided us,” he said. “Stations, your own data shows, will be nightmarish.”

Lander is one of many Downtown leaders who previously supported reviving the express — a longtime cause celebre of Southern Brooklyn reps and residents, who stand to shave up to seven minutes off their commute — but only on the condition it comes with more trains to bolster the local service, and now say they can’t support their neighbors’ good fortune if comes at their expense.

“It just doesn’t work without additional trains,” said Gary Reilly, a former Community Board 6 chair, who was one of the plan’s most vocal Northern supporters. “We always wanted to see an increase in overall service on the line so you’re not robbing Peter to pay Paul.”

The study argues the spurned straphangers will still benefit from the trains racing past their noses because their own carriages will feel a little less like sardine cans, but riders say that won’t make up for the chaos on platforms or the delays.

“I’d rather be on a more crowded train that gets me there quickly than a less crowded train that takes longer,” said Mike Racioppo, who is the vice-chairman of Community Board 6, executive director of neighborhood group the Gowanus Canal Community Development Corporation, and lives off the Carroll Street stop.

A spokesman for the authority stressed that it is still at the beginning of the planning process, and said its reps will embark on a tour of meetings with relevant community boards and politicians’ offices.

But the study doesn’t portend well for their chances of convincing the agency to add more local trains — it claims there are none to spare, and the line only has room for one or two more an hour anyway — or restoring and reopening the fire-ravaged lower level of Bergen Street as an extra express stop — which it says would cost more than $75 million.

Updated 10:20 am, May 19, 2016
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

Pedro Valdez Rivera Jr. from BS, BK, NY, US says:
Welcome to the world of George Orwell's "Animal Farms" in this situation, where it benefits one particular group over another. If you want F Express Service, then add more permanent G Local Service with more subway cars. In addition, the signal system on the northern section of the IND Culver Line needs to be modernized with Communication Based Train Control.
May 18, 2016, 9:34 am
Antonio T. says:
Is one option more environmentally responsible than the other?
May 18, 2016, 11:04 am
Jeff from Coney Island says:
F Train express service should extend all the way to Kings Highway!!
May 18, 2016, 12:42 pm
Lisa from Kensington says:
I am all for an express train from Ditmas Ave.
Finally!
Also, why isn't it an option to widen the stairways at Bergen St? That's always been a problem....
May 18, 2016, 2:07 pm
Malvina Reynolds from Kensington says:
And that's the truth, Ruth! I've lived in Carroll Gardens and I've lived off the Ave J stop so I know both sides...

And it's completely asinine to reduce service btween Church and Jay Street because-- HELLO!!!!!!!!!-- like it or not, you see all those big buildings up on 4th Ave and now Gowanus?

Higher density NEEDS greater service, end of conversation.

It's always been a trade off living closer in or further out but this "solution" is anything but.
May 18, 2016, 5:46 pm
steve from Boerum Hill says:
the lower level at Bergen Street needs to be restored for express service as it was
May 18, 2016, 6:36 pm
Jspech from Bedstuy says:
Increasing G local services is a good idea. I think this part of the plan when L shuts down any way
May 20, 2016, 12:10 pm
Charles from Bklyn says:
I think we should leave the F service alone. It works 5x times better than in the 1990s, and taking service from one location for the benefit of other locations is unfair. The MTA should use their funds to increase the number of local F trains.
May 20, 2016, 7:05 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter:

Optional: