Sections

Red Hookers: Fancy rehab clinic switched sites without telling us!

Hooked: A rendering of the planned Hook Recovery Center.
Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

This rehab clinic didn’t come clean, say Red Hookers.

The people behind Brooklyn’s answer to the Betty Ford Center started building their swanky sobriety facility in the neighborhood last month — around the corner from where they told neighbors it would be. Now residents are fuming that they weren’t consulted about the already-controversial facility’s change of location, according to one local leader.

“The fact that there was apparent and blatant dishonesty is extremely aggravating and distressing to the community at large,” said John McGettrick, chair of neighborhood civic group the Red Hook Civic Association.

In 2014, the Hook Recovery Center honchos Michael Mosberg — husband to “Girls” star Jemima Kirk, whom he met in rehab — and his business partner Johan Sorensen presented the community with their plans for a drug and alcohol recovery center, then called the Urban Recovery House, at 110 Beard St. between Richards and Van Brunt streets.

Neighbors were wary then, remembering the many methadone clinics the neighborhood has housed in the past, but Community Board 6 nevertheless approved their application for the $50,000-per-stay get-clean complex — under the condition that the center create a community advisory group before it opens.

Borough Park developer Abraham Leser filed plans in December last year to build a five story, 19-room “hotel and ambulatory diagnostic health treatment center” around the corner at 411 Van Brunt St., but news organizations — including this one — didn’t put two and two together, reporting that Leser was building a hotel there after he declined to give any specifics.

Leser owns both the Beard and Van Brunt street sites, according to city records, although the rehab center appears to be limited to the single new lot.

Locals say they only learned the “hotel” and upscale clinic were one and the same when construction began last month, and the switcheroo came as an unpleasant surprise after years of silence.

“It all came as a shock to us because in the last two years we hadn’t heard anything,” said long-time Red Hooker Carol De Bock.

The community board’s district manager says the developer and rehab moguls probably should have given the community a heads-up before building, but thinks they did their due diligence by hosting meetings and going before the local panel with their plans.

“The term ‘misled’ is a little upsetting because I don’t know how people think they were misled,” said Community Board 6 district manager Craig Hammerman. “There were meetings, facts, contacts, relationships formed. The only criticism I would put out there is the sponsor should have re-engaged the community when they activated the site.”

Hammerman said wasn’t aware of the owners making any moves to start the advisory council yet, although the center isn’t scheduled to open until 2017.

The Hook Recovery Center did not return requests for comment.

Reach reporter Lauren Gill at lgill@cnglocal.com or by calling (718) 260–2511. Follow her on Twitter @laurenk_gill
Updated 10:17 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:


Reasonable discourse

Jim from Cobble Hill says:
The try to make them move the rehab, they say no, no no.
Oct. 14, 2016, 9:03 am
Jesse from Park Slope says:
Boo hoo. Red Hook skells again expect to dictate what people do with their property.
Oct. 14, 2016, 6:28 pm
HONEY Pooter from Williamsburg says:
Maybe they were told, but they were high at the time and forgot?
Oct. 17, 2016, 3:24 am
Bridget Kelly from Trenton says:
Time for some traffic problems in Red Hook!
Oct. 17, 2016, 11:15 am
DD from Bay Ridge says:
Red Hook continues to take the brunt of the entire city's trash, such as this center, being built just on the heels of the approval of Obama's 2.2 Bill $$ to fight drug addiction. Additionally, the residents were "misled" throughout the process and this center is directly across the street from the neighborhood wine shop and on the web-site for the rehab center unlawfully used a photo of Sunny's Bar, the neighborhood watering hole. Why doesn't the developer take this center to boro to fit in with the rest of the "shoddy" development going on over there. And Hammaman is clueless anyway he only cares about the constituency who own businesses in the neighborhood to fund his campaign.
Oct. 20, 2016, 4:47 pm
DD from Bay Ridge says:
Why doesn't the developer take this center to his own "Boro Park" neighborhood where they do as they please putting hideous outdoor enclosures on balconies outside of NYC Bldg Dept code.
Oct. 20, 2016, 5 pm
DD from Bay Ridge says:
http://thehookrc.com/#section-latest-news here's mosberg website with the contact us page being a photo of the bar in Red Hook.
Oct. 20, 2016, 7:09 pm
DD from Bay Ridge says:
#Craig Hammermann allows Red Hook rehab center to move forward without resident input and will be overlooking dry dock wine & spirits and the rehab center contact us page is a photo of Sunny's Bar.
Oct. 20, 2016, 7:19 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: