Owner of historic Heights Chipotle building fights landmarking

Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Holy guacamole!

The city should not landmark the iconic 86-year-old Montague Street Art Deco building that currently houses the Brooklyn Heights Chipotle because having to preserve the historic facade will make it too hard for the landlord to redevelop the tower and charge top dollar to tenants who don’t appreciate its antique charm, a spokesman for the building’s owner argued at a Landmarks Preservation Commission public hearing on Tuesday.

“Tenants these days are not looking for the old-style building, they want a new modern look,” said David Malanga, who represents owner the Montague-Goldman Corporation after the hearing. “How am I supposed to collect the same amount of rent as the guy next to my if my building is from the 1920s and his is from the 2000s?”

Malanga was the only person who spoke against placing the historic designation on the National Guaranty Company Tower at 185 Montague St. which is being considered alongside the 110-year-old temple-like Peoples Trust Company bank building at 181 Montague St. next door.

Local civic leaders, preservationists, and architects all gave their enthusiastic thumbs up, but Malagna — who maintained that his company has no immediate plans to redevelop the 15-story skyscraper, known for its intricate detailing courtesy of famed architectural sculptor Rene Chambellan — waved their opinions off, saying they’ll have kicked the bucket by the time his boss does want to renovate.

“Half of those people who were in the room are going to be dead in 50 years,” he said.

Once a building is designated as a landmark, the owner can’t make any changes to its facade without the Commission’s okay.

Preservationists have been campaigning to landmark the pair or properties ever since the city left them out of the Borough Hall Skyscraper Historic District, which it created in 2011, and advised the commissioners to act now to protect the architecturally significant structures before they become victims of the area’s development boom.

“Given the intense development pressure in the vicinity of Brooklyn Heights we’ve brought to your attention the vulnerability of these two remarkable survivors that many in our community erroneously assume are already protected,” said preservationist Otis Pearsall, who led the campaign to designate Brooklyn Heights as the city’s first historic district back in the 1960s. “The moment for their designation and protection should be right now.”

Developer Jonathan Rose, who bought the People’s Trust Company building for $36.5 million in 2015, didn’t make an appearance at the hearing, though he is generally supportive of the special designation, according to Peter Bray, the head of local civic group the Brooklyn Heights Association.

Bray says he wasn’t surprised by Malanga’s objections since landmarked buildings can restrain owners, but is confident the commission will see how important the properties are and act to protect them.

“The LPC’s mission is to designate buildings that are out of outstanding architectural and historical significance and I think all of the other testimony today made very clear that these are extremely important structures and well deserve being landmarked,” he said.

The commissioners will decide the buildings’ fates when they vote on Jan. 17.

Reach reporter Lauren Gill at or by calling (718) 260–2511. Follow her on Twitter @laurenk_gill
Updated 10:17 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

Sol&Lil from beyond the grave says:
Oh, come on David, everyone knows that Goldman doesn't make improvements on its properties. The company buys and holds and eventually sells for long-term capital gain.
Nov. 30, 2016, 11:46 am
ujh from Downtown Brooklyn says:
Is the Montague-Goldman Corporation part of notorious slum landlord Goldman's holdings? You may recall that the senior Goldman had buildings razed in midtown Manhattan under cover of darkness nymerous years ago.
Nov. 30, 2016, 4:24 pm
Rebecca Mazel says:
Tough ——, slumlord!
Nov. 30, 2016, 5:47 pm
landmarks angst from Cobble Hill says:
LPC is just going to Landmark the building and then begin to fine the owner. That's all they know how to do collect fines not preserve. It's all a bunch of bull$h¿t!!!!
Nov. 30, 2016, 8:19 pm
Misty Waters from Brooklyn Heights says:
Who cares whether he wants it or not, the determination should be made based on the merits of the building. The desires of the owner don't change the reality. If they want it, that's good and they can help. If they don't want it, well that's just tough. If they wanted a modern location then they should have bought a different building.
Dec. 1, 2016, 4:16 am
NN from Boerum Hill says:
185 Montague is beautiful. It should absolutely be preserved.
Dec. 1, 2016, 3:43 pm
Choochie Rodriguez from Sunset Park says:
They don't even make a decent guac of moley.
Dec. 3, 2016, 3:10 am

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: