Sections

EXCLUSIVE: Jury finds accused ‘Park Slope Groper’ not guilty

Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

The man police arrested for being the infamous Park Slope Groper was falsely accused, a jury found last week.

Jesse Dailey — who police collared as the culprit behind a spate of gropings in 2013 — walked out of Brooklyn Supreme Court a free man on Jan. 25 after police bungled the investigation and the evidence against him did not add up to a conviction, according to one juror.

“We didn’t have enough evidence to prove it was Jesse Dailey,” said Community News Group reporter Alley Olivier, one of the jurors in the trial. “He seemed like a victim of wrong place, wrong time.”

The media dubbed Dailey the Park Slope Groper after police charged him with grabbing the butts of three girls, ages 10 and 11, in the well-to-do neighborhood on two separate occasions.

The then-34-year-old computer programmer — who was identified due to his resemblance to a widely circulated police sketch of the groper — has long maintained that he was a victim of mistaken identity.

The case against Dailey was dismantled in large part by the officers who created it. In a pre-trial hearing, one of the detectives testified that he had never shown the victims a picture of Dailey before they picked him out in a lineup. The claim was later proven false, shredding the cop’s credibility.

“We heard that he had lied on the stand,” said Olivier. “The prosecutor admitted to it.”

Experts later testified that, by showing the girls pictures of Dailey before he appeared in a line-up, the detectives had tainted their memory and could have influenced their choice, according to Olivier.

Also sinking the case was the fact that the only victim to see the defendant’s face clearly during the groping did not identify Dailey when asked if her attacker was in the court room.

“The third girl saw the man twice, and both times she saw his full face head on, and she couldn’t ID him,” said Olivier.

Dailey also faced additional charges stemming from an encounter he had with an undercover detective, who — suspecting Dailey of the groping crimes — approached him and asked for identification, which led to a scuffle that left the detective with a dislocated shoulder. The jury acquitted him on that count as well.

The jury — which included parents and teachers — didn’t doubt that someone groped the girls and had a strong desire to see the person responsible brought to justice, but after much deliberation, they simply weren’t convinced Dailey was that man, Olivier said.

“It was a hard decision,” she said. “We really wanted to see justice done for these girls.”

Reach reporter Colin Mixson at cmixson@cnglocal.com or by calling (718) 260-4505.
Updated 10:17 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:


Reasonable discourse

BrooklynGersh from The WT says:
When you say "the media" dubbed this guy the "Park Slope Groper," I think you mean I dubbed him that. I also dubbed the Sunset Park masturbater as "The Sunset Park Masturbater"! (drops mic)
Feb. 1, 2016, 2:07 pm
BrooklynGersh from The WT says:
When you say "the media" dubbed this guy the "Park Slope Groper," I think you mean I dubbed him that. I also dubbed the Sunset Park masturbater as "The Sunset Park Masturbater"! (drops mic)
Feb. 1, 2016, 2:09 pm
jjm from c. hill says:
He's about to get paid. Big azz lawsuit coming soon.
Feb. 1, 2016, 2:43 pm
Honey Pooter from Feminist says:
This is a travesty. I blame the patriarchy. All men are rapists. None of them are innocent. Some rape a woman without even touching them. With their dirty minds. They may deny it, and the police never listen to women. Over eighty percent of women who have been eye raped don't even realize it. It's called everyday sexism. Look it up - you might learn something!
Feb. 1, 2016, 4:09 pm
Jim from Cobble Hill says:
When I was on jury duty, my default position was to never believe police or prosecutors. 5 minutes and YouTube access can show enough examples of them lying whever they think they won't get caught.
Feb. 2, 2016, 11:08 am
samir kabir from downtown says:
Isn't a Groper a fish?
Feb. 3, 2016, 5:22 am
Pamela Howard says:
Thank you Jim from Cobble Hill - but I have been on youtube for hours and all I've found are videos of cats. Why do those relate to a man who grabs women's jiggly buttocks against their will and better judgement??
Feb. 3, 2016, 9:05 am
Sister from Mother says:
Shouldn't be that hard to find him. Gather the suspects, smell their fingers, if one smells like poo - them he's your man!
Feb. 3, 2016, 9:56 am
samir kabir from downtown says:
In my culture, if man touches woman, woman says thank you. She says "thank you Allah, superior man touched my hairy Muslim butt!". All is happy.
Feb. 3, 2016, 12:33 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: