Sections

Mass resistance: Locals, electeds turn out in force to oppose megadevelopment in Boerum Hill

Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

It’s far too big!

The builders proposing a massive development nearly three times the size of what can currently go up on a Boerum Hill lot shouldn’t even bother breaking out their shovels, according to one pol who blasted the plan at the first meeting of its public-review process on Wednesday.

“This project should be dead on arrival,” Public Advocate Tish James, who lives in nearby Clinton Hill, said during the hearing inside the auditorium at St. Francis College in Brooklyn Heights, which was so packed that organizers turned some people away.

James joined more than 200 people, most of whom also charged the super-sized scheme has no place in the neighborhood, at Community Board 2’s meeting kicking off the city’s Uniform Land Use Review Procedure for 80 Flatbush — a project by real-estate company Alloy Development that calls for constructing 38- and 74-story high-rises as part of a five-building complex on a lot bounded by Flatbush and Third avenues and State and Schermerhorn streets.

The development will also include a new home for the already on-site Khalil Gibran International School, which educators claim lacks much-needed resources in its current crumbling facility; a new 350-seat elementary school; cultural, office, and retail space; and 900 housing units within the two towers — 200 of which will be permanent, below-market-rate apartments that Alloy will create in partnership with affordable-housing builder the Fifth Avenue Committee.

But in order to build the skyscrapers, bigwigs at luxury real-estate firm must get the city to approve a rezoning that would nearly triple the plot’s allowable “floor-area ratio” — a measurement abbreviated as FAR that determines how high a structure can be relative to the size of the land it is on — to 18 from its current designation of 6.5. The builder’s desired floor-area ratio is also 33 percent larger than the citywide floor-area ratio cap of 12 for residential complexes with affordable housing, according to the Department of Buildings.

Leaders of the Department of Education and that agency’s Educational Construction Fund — which uses money from builders to erect public schools in new developments at no cost to the city — gave the project a thumbs up, claiming it would help alleviate overcrowding in the local district by providing a net gain of 164 elementary-school seats, according to an Education Department rep.

But many of the locals at the meeting laughed that claim off, arguing that even if there are extra seats, all of them will likely go to kids of wealthier families who move into the swanky digs because the so-called affordable apartments inside the taller tower won’t be ready until 2025 — three years after the shorter high-rise’s 250 luxury units are completed.

“The current proposal will not alleviate but likely exacerbate both the current student overcrowding issue and the school equity issue,” said Camille Casaretti, the head of the Community Education Council for District 15, which includes schools in parts of Boerum Hill and Fort Greene as well as nearby Carroll Gardens and Park Slope. “To date we have not received even one positive comment about this project from the 30,000 families that we represent.”

And other critics pointed out that the schools may struggle to recruit students because the classrooms will be finished long before the entire development is finished, forcing young minds to put up with ongoing construction for at least three years.

“Living through years of noise, the school will mostly like lose a lot of enrollment,” said Fort Greener Lucy Koteen. “Who will want to send their kids there?”

A slew of reps for other pols including Assemblywoman Jo Anne Simon, state Sen. Velmanette Montgomery, and Assemblyman Walter Mosely — whose districts all include Boerum Hill — joined James in expressing opposition to the towers. But a rep attending on behalf of local Councilman Stephen Levin did not speak, and Levin — who has mostly stayed quiet about the 80 Flatbush towers even though the land they would rise on is within his district — did not show up, and his will be the key vote on the rezoning application when it reaches Council because the project is on his turf.

Levin previously expressed concerns about the increased congestion one of the development’s two proposed loading docks would cause, but last month Alloy leaders revealed minor tweaks to their master plan, which included nixing one of the loading docks and modifying the shorter tower’s street-level facade to more closely recall that of the nearby Williamsburgh Savings Bank building.

And several attendees spoke in favor of the project, including the president of the quasi-public development-boosting Downtown Brooklyn Partnership, Regina Myer — who 80 Flatbush opponents nearly booed off the mic — and Khalil Gibran’s principal, who said his bright-eyed pupils are desperate for a better learning house and urged the community to support the proposal.

“Because of our current challenges, and the fact that our students need and deserve a better facility to prepare them for 21st-century expectations, I strongly support this project,” said Winston Hamann. “Despite your feelings about it, I know you support us as a school community.”

Community Board 2’s Land Use Committee will cast its purely advisory vote on the rezoning application for 80 Flatbush on April 18, prior to kicking it over to Borough President Adams, who will host his own public hearing on the proposal on April 30, before it heads to the City Planning Commission, then Council, and ultimately Mayor DeBlasio.

80 Flatbush public hearing at Borough Hall (209 Joralemon St. between Court Street and Brooklyn Bridge Boulevard in Downtown) on April 30 at 6 pm.

Reach reporter Julianne Cuba at (718) 260–4577 or by e-mail at jcuba@cnglocal.com. Follow her on Twitter @julcuba.
Updated 5:47 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

Mike from Williamsburg says:
Tish James owns property, does she not? She should disclose that she stands to gain financially from a housing shortage in the neighborhood.
March 30, 3:28 pm
BrooklynGersh from The WT says:
This building should be even taller. Housing is in crisis because there’s not enough of it — and there’s no better place for it except above mass transit in America’s Downtown.
March 30, 4:09 pm
Brad from Park Slope says:
People in this city can’t get out of their own way. This project is a huge win for Brooklyn. Try to find another developer who cares as much about the public good. Really weigh the benefits here folks. Look past your selfish desires for brownstone Brooklyn and see that this city is a starving for public amenities that the public sector can’t support on their own.
March 30, 8:12 pm
Bkmanhatman from Williamsburg says:
Glad people are fighting back. More affordable housing!
March 30, 9:11 pm
Roberto Gautier from Brooklyn Heights says:
In the past, when he opposed putting a hotel in Brooklyn Bridge Park, Steve Levin was an admirable voice. I'm puzzled about his silence on the issue of the Boerum Hill tower.
April 1, 7:11 am
Andrew Porter from Brooklyn Heights says:
Ah, good old Regina Meyer, whose stewardship of Brooklyn Bridge Park gave us all those condos in the park and the horrible, too tall PierHouse hotel and condos.

If I'd been there, I'd have joined in booing her off the podiuml
April 1, 2:09 pm
Jim from Cobble Hill says:
Jeez pick a day to publish this thing and just leave it there. You got it on the front page for April 1.
April 1, 4:05 pm
NN from Boerum Hill says:
Downtown Brooklyn needs more housing and more schools. This project has both. Flatbush is a good place to build tall buildings.
April 1, 8:16 pm
Carl from Ft Greene says:
Regina Myer is an example of failing upward. This truly unimpressive woman lacks presence, savvy and even a shred of intelligence. She has yet to speak anywhere I've ever sern her where she hasn't been a stumbling, mumbling mess. She was true to form here, unable to project, disjointed, reading a statement as if she'd never seen the words before, continuing to stumble along past the time limit, she had to be forced bavk to her seat. She was embarassing. She gets the promotions and the big bucks because she's weak and stupid, trsits valued across party lines and administrations. Regina Myer wasn't booed nearly enough. The DOE and Gibran school are without shame pushing students to pimp for a luxury developer. It doesn't get any sleazier than exploiting children. As one former CB2 member testified, "If you want to build a,school, build a school. If you want to build affordable housing, build affordable housing." Steve Levin wasn't there because he's a coward. He sold out the Brooklyn Heights library to a developer and he intends to sell out Boerum Hill to this developer. Levin isn't stupid like Regina Myer but he's just as weak. He will sell out his constituents to this developer.
April 2, 9:41 am
Tal Barzilai from Pleasantville, NY says:
The reason why this is opposed so much is mainly because of its scale with the area. Since Tish James was brought up, she was a known vocal opponent on the Atlantic Yards (now called Pacific Park) when it was brought up. As a matter of fact, some of those who are here supporting this project can almost pass for the paid supporters of the Atlantic Yards especially with some of their attitudes whenever it's being questioned. Meanwhile, I highly doubt the affordable housing mentioned will really be affordable to the lower classes, which makes it nothing more than a joke for them.
April 2, 5:04 pm
Henry Ford from Bay Ridge says:
Ok chump keep telling yourself that. You have no spine and no self respect or pride and we all know it. Keep beating your chest from the safety of your hole coward.
April 2, 7:32 pm
Sparkle from Bay Ridge says:
That building is so tall that I fear it will bolt out the sun and fall over and crush my cats.
April 2, 8:14 pm
Dimitri from Ft Greene says:
The developers were such wimpy guys. Who are they kidding with their giant tower. Maybe their wives. Have the authorities demanded to see their funding? Do they have the jack to build or is this a big developer-City Council bluff to sew up the property and subdidies and then go bust?
April 3, 12:17 pm
Vision Zero from Zero Vision says:
Speaking of wimpy guys, lil henry ford from Bay Ridge can't stop running his mouth, like a keyboard warrior. Sad, really sad.
April 3, 1:18 pm
Kate from Downtown Brooklyn says:
Check out the diagram of blocked sunlight throughout the day. The shadows from this thing will go much farther than the garden, reducing light at 25 Lafayette Ave, a residential building a block down,and in the whole neighborhood.
April 30, 10 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter:

Optional: