Sections

Spoke too soon: Fourth Ave. bike lane may not skip block in front of police station after all, city says

On second thought: The city is walking back previous statements that the planned Fourth Avenue bike lane would skip a block between 29th and 30th streets to accommodate the police department’s sidewalk parking outside of the 72nd Precinct station house.
Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

Talk about backpedaling.

The city is walking back its statement that the forthcoming protected Fourth Avenue bike lane would skip one side of an entire block in front of Sunset Park’s 72nd Precinct station house to accommodate officers’ sidewalk parking, after local cyclists called out the dangers of merging into traffic in the Bay Ridge-bound lane.

Reps from the Department of Transportation said the plan was not yet finalized and is still under review — even though the agency’s borough commissioner told one concerned cyclist it was final. And although the agency’s willingness to reconsider its decision came as good news to that cyclist, he said he doubts that the police will change their behavior to accommodate bikers.

“I want to believe that DOT will get this right, but NYPD’s disregard for bike lanes all over the city doesn’t inspire a ton of optimism,” said John Tomac.

Streetsblog first reported that Tomac e-mailed borough transportation commissioner Keith Bray in January to ask how the station house between 29th and 30th streets would accommodate the planned five-foot-wide protected bike lane, since police park a mix of squad cars and personal vehicles on a portion of the sidewalk in front of the building, with cars often jutting out into what would be the bike lane.

Bray responded nearly two months later, writing that it was “not feasible” for the bike lane to be separated from traffic by a physical barrier as the plan outlines “due to the need to maintain parking access for NYPD vehicles,” making the entire block “effectively a driveway.” When this paper followed up with the transportation agency last month, it confirmed that the entire southbound lane on that block would be reserved for police parking, eliminating the bike lane entirely between 29th and 30th streets.

But Community Board 7 district manager Jeremy Laufer said that he has now received verbal assurances from the Transportation Department’s director of greenways, Ted Wright, that the plan to skip the block is not finalized.

Laufer pointed out that when the board voted overwhelmingly in favor of the bike lane in October, the city had not told CB7 members anything about nixing it in front of the 72nd Precinct station house.

“The board voted in favor of the bike lane, there was no discussion on any sort of difference on Fourth Avenue between 29th and 30th streets,” he said.

That the Transportation Department apparently failed to foresee — or perhaps just neglected to disclose — the problem of running the bike lane past the station house doesn’t reflect well on the agency, said Tomac.

“In the year 2018, a competent transportation agency should be able to anticipate the problems that are likely to arise when a bike lane is added near the 72nd Precinct,” he said. “Anyone who occasionally rides a bike around the city knows that bike lanes might as well not exist anytime the police are nearby.”

A spokeswoman for the agency confirmed that it was still reviewing the plans, and would keep the community’s safety concerns in mind.

“The Department of Transportation is currently reviewing plans for the Fourth Avenue bike lane,” she said. “We are aware of the concerns and will continue to work closely with the community and NYPD to accommodate neighborhood needs.”

The police department did not respond by press time to inquiries about sidewalk parking at the precinct or what percentage of its officers commutes to work via subway.

Reach reporter Julianne McShane at (718) 260–2523 or by e-mail at jmcshane@cnglocal.com. Follow her on Twitter @juliannemcshane.
Updated 5:45 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

Death from Above says:
This is great news! The nypd is NOT above the law.
April 30, 8:15 am
Simon Beswick says:
So this newspaper reported an original story based on lies? Typical that you would try to stir up controversy based on nothing more than thin air.
April 30, 9:28 am
NN from Boerum Hill says:
It's time for the NYPD to start following the law and stop putting the rest of us at risk.
April 30, 1:06 pm
TOM from Sunset Park says:
Moderation in commenting. Please.
April 30, 2:24 pm
Brian T from Concord, SI (via Sheepshead Bay) says:
Hi Mods,

Please remove my previous comment; I omitted a word.

Good. If skipping a sidewalk for one block in NYC won't do, neither should skipping an on-street cycling facility.

It's one thing to have a not-as-protected bike lane for a short block, and it's entirely another to have it disappear. Given the traffic volumes of the area during the day (or at all times for that matter), such a gap would not be conducive to promoting cycling as a viable mode of transportation for New Yorkers of all ages and skill levels.

There are tried and true methods to have reverse angle parking and cycling facilities coexist:

1. Bike lane in front of the cars
http://naturalcyclection.bostonbiker.org/files/2014/08/Reverse-Angle.png

2. Bike lane behind the cars (safer for the cyclist but requires more lateral space for rear buffer)
https://www.sfmta.com/sites/default/files/pictures/AAG%20-%20Bay%20St%20Photo%2012.4.15.jpg
May 2, 11:26 am

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter:

Optional: