Sections

Mom: Golden promised me more speed cameras after my son’s death, then changed his tune

Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

This mom was up all night worrying about other people’s kids.

A Park Slope mother whose son was killed by a reckless driver recently spent 24 hours protesting outside a Bay Ridge state senator’s local office because she claimed the pol backtracked on a personal promise to her that he’d push the passage of a bill to double the number of speed cameras citywide, which his Republican party blocked in the state Senate.

Amy Cohen, who stood vigil with other safe-street activists, claimed Sen. Marty Golden has the power to get the legislation passed before the city’s speed-camera program expires on July 25 — but is choosing not to.

“He told me personally in a meeting that he committed to guaranteeing passage of this bill, but then he issues tweets saying that the speed-safety cameras are unfair because they give $50 fines,” said Cohen, who is a co-founder of Families for Safe Streets. “He is the most senior Republican senator in New York City — if he wanted this bill to happen, if he was truly fighting for it, it would have passed already.”

In 2013, a driver killed Cohen’s son, 12-year-old Samuel Cohen Eckstein, near his Prospect Park West home. And last month, his mother brought a beach chair to the sidewalk outside Golden’s Fifth Avenue office, between 74th and 75th streets, where she stayed from 9 am on June 28 until 9 am the next morning. Throughout the day and night, other parents who had also lost children to rogue motorists stopped by, along with local activists and community members.

Golden reversed his years-long opposition to speed cameras in May when he signed on to support a bill reauthorizing the speed-camera program and doubling their number to 290 citywide, which the Republican-controlled state Senate refused to vote on before the end of their session on June 20.

Then Golden appeared to reverse course again just days later, co-sponsoring a new bill requiring the installation of stop signs or traffic lights at intersections in school zones and extending the current speed-camera program for just six months beyond its July 25 expiration date, among other measures.

Cohen and other street-safety advocates told passersby to go into Golden’s office on the first day of the 24-hour rally, encouraging them to demand to talk to staffers about the speed cameras. But employees soon locked the doors so constituents could no longer enter, according to Cohen.

Later that day, a now-deleted tweet appeared on Golden’s account criticizing the protesters and demanding that they instead confront Gov. Cuomo or Senate Majority Leader John Flanagan (R–Long Island), who have the power to convene a special session of the Senate to bring the speed-camera bill to the floor for a vote.

Golden’s spokesman did not respond by press time to inquiries about the deleted tweet, Cohen’s claims that staffers locked the door, or the pol’s in-person promise to her that he would get the bill passed.

The second morning of the rally, a handful of protesters — including Councilman Brad Lander (D–Park Slope) — formed a blockade outside Golden’s office, and then moved to block the street, where they were arrested for civil disobedience. Cohen said the blockade was meant to send Golden back to Albany to work on passing the speed-camera bill.

“The goal was to block Sen. Golden’s door because he should be working in Albany and not here in Brooklyn,” she said.

She added that she heard Golden was en route to the office that morning and turned around when he heard the protesters were still out in full force, adding that she never saw Golden at all during the 24-hour protest.

Golden’s spokesman said that the state senator went to his office on Friday, but did not specify when. He said in a statement that Golden maintains the support he has shown for speed cameras in years’ past and that he respected the commitment of Cohen and the others who protested.

“Sen. Golden has long supported the use of speed cameras in New York City and was a key vote for the legislation in 2013 that authorized the original 145,” said John Quaglione. “Sen. Golden is co-sponsoring legislation that will double the number of speed cameras to 290, and is strongly advocating for the Senate to return to Albany to approve this measure. Sen. Golden commends the dedication of those who kept vigil outside his office and stands by his commitment to ensuring the safety of all New Yorkers.”

There were 60 percent fewer daily violations in school zones with speed cameras in the two years after they were first installed in 2014, according to a transportation agency report published last June — a statistic that Cohen said explains the widespread support for the cameras.

“There is overwhelming support in the community for this effort,” she said. “They are proven to work and they’re a lifesaving tool.”

Reach reporter Julianne McShane at (718) 260–2523 or by e-mail at jmcshane@cnglocal.com. Follow her on Twitter @juliannemcshane.
Updated 5:40 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

MJ from Bay Ridge says:
the speed-safety cameras are unfair because they give $50 fines - but a chance to save a life probably worth much more.
July 6, 9:40 am
Resident from Brooklyn says:
Bay Ridge: don't send this guy back to Albany. Vote for one of his challengers this fall. Time for Marty's career in politics to end.
July 6, 9:49 am
Truth from NYC says:
A Park Slope mother whose son was killed by a reckless driver

Seriously? Boy, talk about revisionist history. Her son chased a soccer ball into the street on PPW, a street that had already received a DOT "safe streets makeover". Zero charges were filed against the driver, yet he (not the victim's) behavior was reckless?
July 6, 11:53 am
Jason from LES says:
"the speed-safety cameras are unfair because they give $50 fines" - I agree. A $50 fine is horribly unfair. These people are willfully risking the lives of children in order to shave a few seconds off their travel time. Surely a $500 fine would be fairer Marty you absolutely useless, feckless, lying piece of old lady killing scum.
July 6, 12:25 pm
Jason from LES says:
"Truth from NYC": the driver was almost certainly speeding. Collisions at or under the speed limit of 25mph rarely result in death. Also, the child had the light when he ran into the road. The lights changed as he slipped on yhe wet surface and a van slammed into him. That driver was almost certainly speeding and not paying attention. Just because the lights change it does not mean you have a blank check to mow down whomever might remain on the crosswalk.
July 6, 12:30 pm
John from Bay Ridge says:
Marty really stabbed his constituents in the back. Especially in the 68 precinct, where the top law enforcement priority is to issue summons to parked cars, and moving violations are routinely ignored because the patrol cars can’t be bothered to enforce the law, and the precinct commanders just don’t care.

We need speed cameras, red light cameras, and stop sign cameras. Lots of them. Obey the rules and you won’t get a ticket. It’s pretty simple.
July 6, 2:07 pm
Kelly from Park Slope says:
Jason from LES - you aren’t taking into account how fast the child was running. Even if a car is only travelling at 25 mph, when a child runs into it at 25 mph it’s the same as a 50 mph collision. That’s how they die.
July 6, 4:08 pm
Henry Ford from Bay Ridge says:
I can’t wait for the crying and whining from the haters and losers when Marty cruises to victory yet again in November.
July 6, 4:24 pm
TOM from Sunset Park says:
I was at the NYC Council Transportation Committee meeting where Ms. Cohen, the mother, testified for the first time publicly after the tragic death of her son. She was quite brave and moving. The chairman was in tears at the end. I felt it, all present were moved.

Truth From NYC: you really know how to hurt with words.

Jason: Let's not argue again the circumstances here and now. Many versions have been presented. I have my own thoughts but I just concluded it was truly an accident without malice. Everyone would wish it never happened.
July 6, 5:02 pm
Vision Zero from Zero Vision says:
That pudgy loser lil henry is right. Everyone knows Bay Ridge is full of fatass loser bigots with nothing better to do than vote.
July 6, 9:03 pm
William from Brooklyn Heights says:
Whatever happened to children looking both ways before crossing the street?
These are school aged children - they ought to be clever enough not to endager their own lives. Why remove all personal accountability? It will create a generation of spoiled, entitled, and lazy people.
July 7, 3:30 pm
Midge from Mill Basin says:
I only hope that some of you people who are saying a child is responsible for his own death die horrible deaths yourself. If my Morris, may he rest in peace, were still here, he would give you what-for, you lowlifes.

I am contributing to Ross Barkan's campaign.

As for Marty Golden, Run Him Over! Run Him Over! Run Him Over!
July 9, 10:43 am

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Don’t miss out!

Stay in touch with the stories people are talking about in your neighborhood:

Optional: Help us tailor our newsletters to you!