Sections

►Video

A woman told police she was raped. Cops, citing grainy video, disagreed.

Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

Wanted: Police are looking for this creep, who they say did not rape a woman, even though she says he did.

A woman told police that a man raped her on a Williamsburg street in the early morning on Oct. 4, but cops aren’t taking her word for it, and instead cited dark and grainy surveillance footage as evidence that she was a victim of attempted rape, according to officers and the public report they circulated following the incident.

The 27-year-old victim told authorities that she was walking on Richardson Street between Humbolt and N. Henry streets when the creep crossed the street, pushed her to the ground, removed her underwear, and entered her vagina with his penis without permission, Police Department spokeswoman Cdt. Taylor Cannon said, repeating language used by the victim in the police report she filed about an hour after cameras captured the act around 2:15 am.

“That’s what the actual report says,” Cannon said. “It’s a rape, not attempted.”

But authorities’ Oct. 5 public notice about the incident, which included an edited clip of the surveillance video, described it as an attempted rape, alleging the perv knocked the victim down and penetrated her with his fingers when she tried to fight him off after he approached her from behind on Richardson Street near Kingsland Avenue, pushed her against the wall of a building, and tore off her underwear.

When asked to explain cops’ description of the incident as an attempted rape when the victim told them she was raped, Cannon initially said it was a mistake.

“It’s an error,” she said.

But when pushed about the discrepancy and why police would publicly describe the incident as an attempted rape despite the victim’s own statement to the contrary, Cannon put this reporter on hold, then said the blurry footage officers obtained provided a more accurate account of the incident than the woman did when reporting it an hour after it happened.

“The victim doesn’t always have an accurate recollection of what happened. No penis to vagina contact,” said Cannon, before transferring the call to her supervisor, Sgt. Lee Jones.

Jones also insisted the full video — which authorities did not publicly share — doesn’t actually show the perv’s penis enter the victim’s vagina, but only him molesting her.

“The video doesn’t show that she was raped. Not every criminal sex act is rape,” he said. “She made a statement, we saw the video.”

And the nature of the crime wasn’t the only point of confusion in the reps’ accounts of the incident, which occurred roughly two days before 50 United States senators decided multiple women’s allegations of sexual assault against Justice Brett Kavanaugh were not substantiated enough to deprive him of a lifetime appointment on the Supreme Court.

Each police rep provided a different timeline in describing the victim’s actions following the attack.

Cannon said the victim took an Uber from Kingsland Avenue to the 90th Precinct station house, where paramedics met her and took her to Woodhull Hospital for a rape kit.

But Jones said the victim first went back to her apartment, and then with her roommate came to the station house before paramedics took her to the hospital from there.

Authorities are still hunting for the slimeball, who fled in a dark-colored sedan towards Morgan Avenue following the attack, Jones said.

And should police arrest the man and charge him with attempted rape, prosecutors can always change the charge based on their own investigation, according to a rep for the district attorney’s office.

Anyone with information regarding the incident is asked to call Crime Stoppers at (800) 577–8477. The public can also submit tips by logging onto the Crime Stoppers website at www.nypdcrimestoppers.com or by texting tips to 274637 (CRIMES) then entering TIP577. All tips are strictly confidential.

Reach reporter Julianne Cuba at (718) 260–4577 or by e-mail at jcuba@cnglocal.com. Follow her on Twitter @julcuba.
Updated 10:52 am, October 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

Jim from Cobble Hill says:
Someone was attacked. It is a bad thing but the DAs office needs all their ducks in a row in order to make an effective case. What should be truly infuriating, is that the difference between "rape" and "attempted rape" is even coming into play here. Contact your NY State Rep to let them know that this kind of legal hair-splitting in unacceptable.
Oct. 9, 6:36 am
Jack from Brooklyn says:
Wow Ms Cuba really showing her liberal bias trying to tie this in with Kavanagh. The more likely tie in is with the NYPD and the Mayor fudging crime stats to make the city look safer. They can say rapes are down if they are only classified as “ Attempted “ Just report the fact leave your opinions at the door.
Oct. 9, 7:42 am
Brenda from Queens says:
Was there penis-vagina action or not? That’s the crucial question we need answered to know if it was real rape or the lesser crime of finger rape.
Oct. 9, 9:54 am
Kal from Queens says:
Why is "finger rape" considered a lesser crime? One would think that any unconsented penetration of a sexual part - be it with a penis or a pencil - in would be considered rape.
Oct. 11, 5:06 pm
Jackie from Brooklyn Heights says:
She wasn't facing him, in a state of panic and felt a bare appendage enter her.
Oct. 15, 9:40 pm
Frank A from East Williamsburg says:
Forced penetration is rape, how is a finger less terrible than anything else???? I really hope they get this piece of trash. But my faith in the 94th is low.
Oct. 20, 11:54 am

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter:

Optional: