Sections

Slopers demand MTA bring elevator to Seventh Ave. station in $40B subway fix

Going down: Councilman Brad Lander, with mic, and Assemblyman Robert Carroll, right, rallied in partnership with Park Slope residents and disabled advocates to demand state transit leaders install an elevator at Seventh Avenue station.
Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

State transit officials must install an elevator at Park Slope’s Seventh Avenue subway station as part of their recently unveiled plan to make more hubs accessible across the city, locals and pols demanded.

“The Metropolitan Transportation Authority must include the Seventh Avenue station in any plans for accessibility upgrades,” Councilman Brad Lander (D–Park Slope) said at a Friday rally outside the station.

Lander called on the head of the state-run agency’s local arm, New York City Transit chief Andy Byford, to include the F and G train hub as one of the 50 across the city set to receive accessibility upgrades including elevators as part of the $40-billion so-called Fast Forward plan to modernize the beleaguered system that he revealed in May.

Byford, who said no New Yorker should live further than two stops away from an accessible station in announcing his plan, has yet to name the locations that will be improved.

And Lander said the Seventh Avenue station deserves to be at the top of the list, due to its proximity to Methodist Hospital’s main campus just down the street — as well as the hospital’s new outpatient-care facility set to open on Sixth Street between Seventh and Eighth avenues in 2020 — and the Park Slope Center for Successful Aging, which serves more than 4,000 oldsters each year.

Atlantic Terminal station is currently the area’s nearest elevator-equipped hub, so bringing an elevator to Seventh Avenue would go a long way to opening Brooklyn and beyond to the neighborhood’s disabled residents, who now must schedule trips with transportation service Access-a-Ride 24 hours in advance just to get around, according to one handicapped mom.

“There’s a lot more New York has to offer that I would like to take advantage of,” said Aisling Wharton, who lives two blocks from Seventh Avenue station, and is scooter bound due to chronic-fatigue syndrome.

The Fast Forward plan is not funded, however, and many locals are concerned that its $40-billion price tag underestimates its actual cost, which Park Slope’s Assemblyman suggested is closer to $60 billion.

“I think Andy Byford is very well intentioned, but his Fast Forward plan right now is a 70-page Power Point presentation — it’s not a budget and it is not detailed,” Carroll said.

Lander promised to scrounge up whatever cash he can to help foot the estimated $30-million bill to install an elevator at Seventh Avenue station, but admitted whatever he may contribute from his discretionary budget would only be a drop in the bucket.

“The volume that’s needed is going to be a lot bigger than what we can do from a Council account, and the most important thing is it’s part of a real, systemic approach from the MTA,” the councilman said.

The subway system predates the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, meaning that only new stations are legally required to be made accessible. But the Authority is currently fighting a class-action lawsuit filed last year on behalf of six organizations for disabled people and several handicapped individuals, which could potentially require all stations be made accessible, according to a plaintiff in the suit, Joe Rappaport, who is also the executive director of the Brooklyn Center For Independence of the Disabled.

And until a settlement is reached that legally requires the state-run agency to make all hubs accessible, Rappaport is skeptical about any promise — including the Fast Forward plan’s pledge to bring elevators to some 50 stations — that isn’t backed by cold hard cash.

“I guess you could say, without a legally binding statement, there’s just no guarantee that these stations, or any others will be made accessible,” he said.

Reach reporter Colin Mixson at cmixson@cnglocal.com or by calling (718) 260-4505.
Posted 12:00 am, November 12, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

verajay from Cobble hill says:
What about the Fourth ave station 9th st?that needs a elevator or escalator. Those steps are kilkers.. Comming of the R to get the F. A painful,task. It's long overdue!
Nov. 12, 10:13 am
Waste of Taxpayers $ from Brooklyn says:
These costs are sickening and are a waste of tax payers $. Firstly, the city always winds up paying 10x the cost that anyone else would pay. Secondly, we don't need to waste such exorbitant sums to upgrade working systems when we have important/alternative/better systems hanging in the balance like the BQX - the BQX will be at grade so you won't have the obstacle/inconvenience/COST of going up nor down. Thirdly, access-a-ride is a far cheaper alternative for the handicap and a lot more convenient.
Nov. 12, 11:15 am
The Hunkster from Bed-Stuy says:
That's #CuomosMTA in a nutshell since 2010.
Nov. 12, 11:29 am
Insane from Park Slope says:
I agree it would be insane to spend this kind of taxpayers dollars on an unfortunate few, especially when there's something like access a ride that's far more convenient for them. I doubt the handicap rule was intended for every system to be handicap accessible so long as the handicap have a means of getting from point A to point B. Imaging if Bike-Share had to be handicap accessible! Hey, if access a ride is to limited, than subsidize Uber for the handicap. PS- I'm handicap!
Nov. 12, 11:40 am
Ms. Me from Bay Ridge says:
Elevators are also helpful for people with strollers and shopping carts. [Like the curb cuts turned out to be.] Major stations should get them first,like 9th and 4th, mentioned above.
Nov. 12, 12:44 pm
Ms. Me from Bay Ridge says:
I really would benefit from this, since I lost my feet to the beetus.
Nov. 12, 5:56 pm
Linda from Carroll Gardens says:
I agree with Waste of Dollars above. Let's spend the money on new transportation systems like the BQX that will be a lot easier to use rather than that old subway that you need to be in good health to navigate. I think increasing the access a ride for the handicap is a much smarter way to go too. The subway is no place for a handicap person and there's more problems there for them than just getting them up and down. Think about the whole picture.
Nov. 12, 7:33 pm
Jenny from Crown Heights says:
People with disabilities are not second-class citizens--or, at least, they shouldn't be. That group has the same right to use the subway as those who are able-bodied, both from an ethical POV and by federal law. Commenters claiming things like "the subway is no place for a handicap person" need to rethink that. Imagine what it would mean for you personally not to be able to choose the same ride, with the same freedom, that walking people do. Ableism is as bad as racism, sexism, and ageism, folks. Educate yourselves. Meditate on the fact that you, too, could stop being able-bodied at a moment's notice. How would you like to have to plan every single ride a day in advance? Don't be ableist. ALSO? Elevators help people with heavy packages, bicycles, and strollers. Accessibility is a basic right.
Nov. 13, 5:27 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter:

Optional: