Sections

Business advocates stand up to MTA over Bed-Stuy transit cuts

Less is less: The Myrtle Avenue Brooklyn Partnership launched a petition on Monday calling on the Metropolitan Transit Agency not to reduce service for the B54 this fall.
Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

A brownstone Brooklyn business group is standing in the way of a Metropolitan Transportation Authority scheme to cut service along a Bedford-Stuyevsant bus route.

The Myrtle Avenue Brooklyn Partnership is calling on straphangers to sign an online petition demanding the Transit Authority to reverse its plans to reduce service along the B54’s Bushwick-to-Downtown bus route, which the local group’s chief said is a vital aspect of the community’s transit network.

“For most of Myrtle Avenue — but particularly in Fort Greene and Clinton Hill — the B54 is the only transit link,” said the bid’s executive director Chad Purkey.

The agency plans to eliminate the amount of buses and increase wait times along the B54 — which runs along Myrtle Avenue through Bushwick, Bedford-Stuyvesant, Clinton Hill, and Fort Greene to Jay Street in America’s Downtown — by this fall, along with changes to two other Kings County routes, including the B38 and the B15, documents show.

Transit honchos claim the decision to cannibalize the B54 was inspired by ridership figures along the bus route, which will suffer from longer waits ranging from one to three minutes during the morning peak, midday, and evening hours, while keeping the same schedule as current during the evening peak times.

And while busses will run less frequently along the route, the Authority predicts that remaining buses will stop make their stops more on time, and that occupancy along the route will be higher 22 percent higher on a bus-by-bus basis, according to a spokeswoman.

“The B54 received minimal schedule changes of one to three minutes to align more closely with ridership and the actual travel time on the route, so buses run more on time – a priority we’ve heard from our ridership - and with fewer empty seats,” said Amanda Kwan in an emailed statement.

The agency will continue to take suggestions from straphangers as city transit gurus redesign the bus routes across citywide in the coming months as part of the organization’s Fast Forward plan, according to Kwan.

“We welcome customer feedback as we approach our planned redesign of the entire Brooklyn bus network in the coming months when we will re-examine the route network for the first time in decades,” she said.

But the Transit Authority shouldn’t expect much positive feedback when it comes to taking buses off the street, and one Bedford-Stuyvesant straphanger feared that the cuts will make her daily Downtown commute more difficult.

“For me I think it’s going to be hard, a lot of people use the B54,” said Esmeralda. “It is not only workers, but it’s also for students, college students, regular, elementary, because this is like the main busiest line besides the B38.”

The straphanger worried that some travelers may opt to use their car instead.

“There’s a lot of people who have situations in life, they have to drop off the kids before and they often go by the bus times to get to work on time,” she said. “They’re going to have to start looking for parking so they can get to work on time.”

And Purkey argued that Kings County’s not only would business located in the BID’s commercial hot spots of Clinton Hill and Fort Greene — which are 10 to 15 minutes away from subway service via the J, M, and G lines — take a hit from the cuts, but that Brooklyn’s must vulnerable residents will feel the thinner bus fleet most deeply

“Particularly for seniors in the neighborhood or people who might not be able to rely on ride hail — cutting service for them seems unacceptab­le,” he said.

Reach reporter Kevin Duggan at (718) 260–2511 or by e-mail at kduggan@cnglocal.com. Follow him on Twitter @kduggan16.
Updated 11:55 am, July 31, 2019
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:


Reasonable discourse

The Hunkster from Bed-Stuy says:
I'm confused about the these small businesses in regarding to buses: 1) They don't support bus service cuts because there'll be much less bus riders that would affect their financial bottom line; 2) These same businesses are so hypocritical that they don't support bus lines because they assume that the vocal minority known as the car drivers wouldn't come to their own businesses, which could affect their own financial bottom line; 3) Then again, without bus lanes, buses will be much slower, which could be resulted in much fewer bus riders, and the future, less buses. A Domino effect indeed.
July 31, 10:43 am
John Wasserman from Prospect Heights says:
Hello Hulkster from Bed-Sty. John Wasserman. I'm going to have to respectfully disagree with you here, on every point. Having said that, I'm certainly hoping that you'll have a nice day. My son, Edgar used to be quite the fan of the WWF. -John Wasserman/Prospect Heights
July 31, Noon
The Hunkster from Bed-Stuy says:
Explain why you're disagreeing with me John? Then again, it's nice to have you back as always.
Aug. 1, 12:28 pm
snail from bed stuy - not stuyesant heights says:
As always, nothing from the elected who represent the people in north bed-stuy/not stuyesant heights. Lets see: Rep. Wright is into hair care these days, Cornegy is saving homes - but if people can't get to work they may lose their jobs and then their homes; and Montgomery - I honestly don't even know if she is still alive.
Aug. 1, 3:38 pm
Rene Welles says:
Typical gentrification. Most of the new residents there just take limousines. You can’t justify the buses when no one rides them.
Aug. 2, 1:37 am

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: