Today’s news:

RATNER’S MONEY PIT

The Brooklyn Paper


An economic analysis released this week blasted deeloper Bruce Ratner’s Atlantic Yards arena and high-rise plan as a money loser that would cost the state and city more than half-a-billion dollars.

“Make no mistake, this project from Forest City Ratner will be using taxpayer money, and loads of it,” said Gustav Peebles, of Fort Greene, a Columbia University researcher who co-authored the report with Jung Kim, an urban planner.

Peebles said he felt compelled to undertake the study after a sports economist commissioned by Ratner claimed the $2.5 billion Atlantic Yards project would put $800 million into city and state coffers.

The Peebles and Kim report concludes that the project will be a net loss to taxpayers — to the tune of $506 million.

An anthropologist who studies economic history and is a member of Develop–Don’t Destroy Brooklyn, a group opposed to the Prospect Heights project, Peebles this week charged sports economist Andrew Zimbalist based his Ratner-commissioned Atlantic Yards report on faulty assumptions and “misleading” figures.

“By reanalyzing the data and the assumptions, we come to much more negative conclusions regarding the impact of the entire 17 high-rise and arena Brooklyn Atlantic Yards project on our delicate city and state finances,” the report reads.

In addition to their independent analysis, Peebles said that he and Kim consulted independent think tanks, professors and non-profits for their study.

Ratner purchased the New Jersey Nets this year and, pending approval of the NBA, plans to move them to Brooklyn. He has maintained that the project would use almost no public money because it would be financed largely by the tax revenue it would generate.

But even Zimbalist, in his analysis, estimated that Atlantic Yards would cost taxpayers at $449 million. Pressed by a councilwoman at a public hearing the day the Zimbalist study was released in May, Forest City Ratner Vice President James Stuckey acknowledged that the public’s price tag for Atlantic Yards would be in the hundreds of millions.

A Forest City Ratner spokesman declined to comment for this article.

In addition to the Frank Gehry-designed arena, the project would include 17 towers — reaching as tall as 620 feet — with more than 2 million square feet of commercial space and 4,500 units of housing to be built in the future. The development site is bounded by Dean Street and Flatbush, Atlantic and Vanderbilt avenues.

As part of the sweeping plan Ratner, principal owner of the Forest City Ratner development company, seeks to acquire 11-acres of privately owned land and development rights over the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Long Island Rail Road storage yards on the site.

At the press conference Monday, Peebles asked why the public should subsidize housing where, according to Zimbalist’s report, residents will have an average annual income of $80,000 to $90,000.

Peebles also questioned Zimbalist’s estimates of office vacancy rates in Downtown Brooklyn and the economist’s assumption that the Continental Airlines Arena, the Nets’ current home, in Newark, N.J., would close once the team left.

That assumption also drew a sharp rebuke from the head of the New Jersey Sports & Exposition Authority, the entity that controls the arena.

The authority’s president and CEO, George Zoffinger, said Continental Airlines Arena wasn’t going anywhere.

“If the financial plan for the proposed Brooklyn Arena depends on the closing of the Continental Airlines Arena, then they better redo their math,” Zoffinger said. “Make no mistake, we will continue to be open for business.”

Zoffinger said he would install a half-house curtain to allow the arena to host smaller events and insisted that the arena would be able to book an event for every Nets game lost to Brooklyn.

Zimbalist, a professor at Smith College who has written several books criticizing other arena and stadium projects, called the Peebles and Kim report “sloppy and misleading.”

“I’m not willing to back off anything I’ve said in my report,” Zimbalist said.

“To say I’ve underestimated police costs, they cite Yankee Stadium. They should be looking at Madison Square Garden,” said Zimbalist, explaining that the midtown basketball arena, home to the New York Knicks, is closer in size and has more similar surroundings to the proposed Nets arena than the 60,000-seat baseball stadium.

In their study, Peebles and Kim also criticize Zimbalist for underestimating public service costs associated with the Ratner development including public schools, police, fire, sanitation, public libraries and parks.

Zimbalist was quick to point out that he does not know if the arena is an economic gain.
“I’m not arguing that the arena is a plus fiscally,” said Zimbalist. “I don’t know if it’s a plus or a minus, but the entire project is a plus
fiscally.”

Brendan O’Flaherty, an economics professor at Columbia University, also slammed Zimbalist this week saying the economist was “only arguing that any commercial and housing project makes money for the city,” when all such projects turn profits for the city.

He called the Peebles and Kim report “at least as plausible and maybe more plausible than the Zimbalist numbers.”


Pin It
Print this story Permalink

Reader Feedback

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Links